Literature DB >> 15687227

Neural activity during encoding predicts false memories created by misinformation.

Yoko Okado1, Craig E L Stark.   

Abstract

False memories are often demonstrated using the misinformation paradigm, in which a person's recollection of a witnessed event is altered after exposure to misinformation about the event. The neural basis of this phenomenon, however, remains unknown. We used fMRI to investigate encoding processes during the viewing of an event and misinformation to see whether neural activity during either encoding phase could predict what would be remembered. fMRI data were collected as participants studied eight vignettes (Original Event phase). Shortly afterward, participants studied the same vignettes during scanning, but with changes to several details, serving as the misinformation (Misinformation phase). Two days later, their memories for the Original Event were assessed. Activity that subsequently led to true and false memories was examined during both encoding phases. Two interaction patterns between encoding phase (Original Event and Misinformation) and type of memory (true and false) were observed in MTL and PFC regions. In the left hippocampus tail and perirhinal cortex, a predictive item-encoding pattern was observed. During the Original Event phase, activity was greater for true than false memories, whereas during the Misinformation phase, activity was greater for false than true memories. In other regions, a pattern suggestive of source encoding was observed, in which activity for false memories was greater during the Original Event phase than the Misinformation phase. Together, these results suggest that encoding processes play a critical role in determining true and false memory outcome in misinformation paradigms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15687227      PMCID: PMC548489          DOI: 10.1101/lm.87605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  57 in total

1.  Hippocampal, parahippocampal and occipital-temporal contributions to associative and item recognition memory: an fMRI study.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas; J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; N E Kroll; K Baynes
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-02-12       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Simple and associative recognition memory in the hippocampal region.

Authors:  C E Stark; L R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 3.  The cognitive neuroscience of memory distortion.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Scott D Slotnick
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Observing the transformation of experience into memory.

Authors:  Ken A Paller; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal frontal cortex and medial temporal lobe for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding.

Authors:  W M Kelley; F M Miezin; K B McDermott; R L Buckner; M E Raichle; N J Cohen; J M Ollinger; E Akbudak; T E Conturo; A Z Snyder; S E Petersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Functional-anatomic study of episodic retrieval using fMRI. I. Retrieval effort versus retrieval success.

Authors:  R L Buckner; W Koutstaal; D L Schacter; A D Wagner; B R Rosen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions.

Authors:  J S Janowsky; A P Shimamura; L R Squire
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Human declarative memory formation: segregating rhinal and hippocampal contributions.

Authors:  Guillén Fernández; Peter Klaver; Jürgen Fell; Thomas Grunwald; Christian E Elger
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 9.  The medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; Craig E L Stark; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Medial temporal lobe activation during encoding and retrieval of novel face-name pairs.

Authors:  C Brock Kirwan; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.899

View more
  29 in total

1.  Hippocampal activity during recognition memory co-varies with the accuracy and confidence of source memory judgments.

Authors:  Sarah S Yu; Jeffrey D Johnson; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Whatever gave you that idea? False memories following equivalence training: a behavioral account of the misinformation effect.

Authors:  Danna M Challies; Maree Hunt; Maryanne Garry; David N Harper
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The neural correlates of conceptual and perceptual false recognition.

Authors:  Rachel J Garoff-Eaton; Elizabeth A Kensinger; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Neural mechanisms of reactivation-induced updating that enhance and distort memory.

Authors:  Peggy L St Jacques; Christopher Olm; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Overcoming interference: an fMRI investigation of pattern separation in the medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  C Brock Kirwan; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Following the crowd: brain substrates of long-term memory conformity.

Authors:  Micah Edelson; Tali Sharot; Raymond J Dolan; Yadin Dudai
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Enmanuelle Pardilla-Delgado; Jessica D Payne
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Attentional responses on an auditory oddball predict false memory susceptibility.

Authors:  John E Kiat; Dianna Long; Robert F Belli
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Memory and law: what can cognitive neuroscience contribute?

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Resistance to forgetting associated with hippocampus-mediated reactivation during new learning.

Authors:  Brice A Kuhl; Arpeet T Shah; Sarah DuBrow; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.