Literature DB >> 28188627

Dose dependency of transcranial direct current stimulation: implications for neuroplasticity induction in health and disease.

Mitchell R Goldsworthy1,2, Brenton Hordacre1,3.   

Abstract

Keywords:  human neurophysiology; neuroplasticity; transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28188627      PMCID： PMC5451699          DOI： 10.1113/JP274089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN： 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M C Ridding; U Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Asif Jamil; Giorgi Batsikadze; Hsiao-I Kuo; Ludovica Labruna; Alkomiet Hasan; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Katia Monte-Silva; Min-Fang Kuo; Silvia Hessenthaler; Shane Fresnoza; David Liebetanz; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Ludovica Labruna; Asif Jamil; Shane Fresnoza; Giorgi Batsikadze; Min-Fang Kuo; Benjamin Vanderschelden; Richard B Ivry; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.

Authors:  G Batsikadze; V Moliadze; W Paulus; M-F Kuo; M A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Different current intensities of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation do not differentially modulate motor cortex plasticity.

Authors:  Dawson J Kidgell; Robin M Daly; Kayleigh Young; Jarrod Lum; Gregory Tooley; Shapour Jaberzadeh; Maryam Zoghi; Alan J Pearce
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.599
  6 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Current challenges: the ups and downs of tACS.

Authors:  Nicholas S Bland; Martin V Sale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dose-Response Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Study Design: A Well-Controlled Adaptive Seamless Bayesian Method to Illuminate Negative Valence Role in Tinnitus Perception.

Authors:  Iman Ghodratitoostani; Oilson A Gonzatto; Zahra Vaziri; Alexandre C B Delbem; Bahador Makkiabadi; Abhishek Datta; Chris Thomas; Miguel A Hyppolito; Antonio C D Santos; Francisco Louzada; João Pereira Leite
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Gait and Functional Mobility in Multiple Sclerosis: Immediate Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Paired With Aerobic Exercise.

Authors:  Giuseppina Pilloni; Claire Choi; Giancarlo Coghe; Eleonora Cocco; Lauren B Krupp; Massimiliano Pau; Leigh E Charvet
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 4.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Facilitate Lower Limb Recovery Following Stroke: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Samuel Gowan; Brenton Hordacre
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-05-21

5.  Refining strategies to drive cognitive gains through transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.939
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.