Literature DB >> 28185981

Analysis of the s2 alar-iliac screw as compared with the traditional iliac screw: does it increase stability with sacroiliac fixation of the spine?

Daniel G Hoernschemeyer1, Troy D Pashuck2, Ferris M Pfeiffer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Arthrodesis of the lumbosacral junction continues to be a challenge in pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgery.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical rigidity of two types of lumbosacral fixation. Our hypothesis was that the use of S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) fixation will result in statistically similar biomechanical fixation as compared with use of an iliac screw with a 95% confidence interval. STUDY
SETTING: Controlled biomechanical laboratory
METHODS: Ten human cadaveric lumbosacral specimens were separated into two test groups: (1) S2AI (n=5) and (2) iliac screw (n=5). S2AI and iliac screws were placed according to current clinical practice techniques. Specimens were mounted in an unconstrained dual leg stance configuration for testing in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. These loads were induced by moving the offset loading arm 10 mm in the respective direction from the point of neutral motion with displacement control up to a 10 N-m moment, except axial rotation which used a 4 N-m moment. Optical tracking was used to monitor motion of the vertebra, pelvis, and fixation instrumentation during testing. Specimens were tested in intact and instrumented states. The stiffness values between S2AI and iliac screw configurations were compared. DISCLOSURE: The present study received external research support (>$50,000 -<$75,000) from Stryker Spine (Allendale, NJ, USA).
RESULTS: There was a consistent trend of increased construct stiffness for all S2AI samples compared with the iliac screw group. However, none of the groups tested reached statistical significance for a 95% confidence interval.
CONCLUSIONS: S2AI screws are just as stable as iliac screws with biomechanical testing in flexion, extension, rotation, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Given the similarities of biomechanical testing to human movements, these findings support S2AI screws as a viable option for lumbosacral fixation.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iliac screw; Lumbosacral fixation; S2 alar-iliac screw; Sacropelvic fixation; Scoliosis; Spinal biomechanics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28185981     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  12 in total

Review 1.  Comparative radiological outcomes and complications of sacral-2-alar iliac screw versus iliac screw for sacropelvic fixation.

Authors:  Ziwei Gao; Xun Sun; Chao Chen; Zhaowei Teng; Baoshan Xu; Xinlong Ma; Zheng Wang; Qiang Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Sequential correction technique to avoid postoperative global coronal decompensation in rigid adult spinal deformity: a technical note and preliminary results.

Authors:  Hongda Bao; Zhen Liu; Yuancheng Zhang; Xu Sun; Jun Jiang; Bangping Qian; Saihu Mao; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Evaluation of iliac screw, S2 alar-iliac screw and laterally placed triangular titanium implants for sacropelvic fixation in combination with posterior lumbar instrumentation: a finite element study.

Authors:  Gloria Casaroli; Fabio Galbusera; Ruchi Chande; Derek Lindsey; Ali Mesiwala; Scott Yerby; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanics of sacropelvic fixation: a comprehensive finite element comparison of three techniques.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Gloria Casaroli; Ruchi Chande; Derek Lindsey; Tomaso Villa; Scott Yerby; Ali Mesiwala; Matteo Panico; Enrico Gallazzi; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  S2 alar-iliac screw versus traditional iliac screw for spinopelvic fixation: a systematic review of comparative biomechanical studies.

Authors:  Takashi Hirase; Caleb Shin; Jeremiah Ling; Brian Phelps; Varan Haghshenas; Comron Saifi; Darrell S Hanson
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-28

6.  Iliac screw instrumentation to the pelvis in children with neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis. No lateral connectors and respect sagittal balance.

Authors:  Zhenkai Wu; Richard M Schwend; John T Anderson; Joanne Abby M Marasigan; Nigel J Price
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-01-25

7.  Innovative sacropelvic fixation using iliac screws and triangular titanium implants.

Authors:  Matteo Panico; Ruchi D Chande; Derek P Lindsey; Ali Mesiwala; Tomaso Maria Tobia Villa; Scott A Yerby; Enrico Gallazzi; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Fabio Galbusera
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Description of the Sacropelvic Parameters Measurement Method for S2-alar iliac Screw Insertion.

Authors:  Mariana Demétrio de Sousa Pontes; Lucas Klarosk Ismael; Lucas Américo Francisco; Carlos Fernando Pereira da Silva Herrero
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-07-22

9.  The Prevalence and Risk Factors for S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Loosening with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakashima; Tokumi Kanemura; Kotaro Satake; Kenyu Ito; Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Jun Ouchida; Naoki Segi; Hidetoshi Yamaguchi; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-11-05

10.  REPRODUCIBILITY OF S2-ALAR ILIAC SCREW MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Mariana Demétrio DE Sousa Pontes; Lucas Américo Francisco; Lucas Klarosk Ismael; Carlos Fernando Pereira DA Silva Herrero
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.