Literature DB >> 33987735

Comparative radiological outcomes and complications of sacral-2-alar iliac screw versus iliac screw for sacropelvic fixation.

Ziwei Gao1, Xun Sun1, Chao Chen1, Zhaowei Teng2, Baoshan Xu1, Xinlong Ma1, Zheng Wang3, Qiang Yang4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of sacropelvic fixation (SPF) using sacral-2-alar iliac (S2AI) screw with SPF using iliac screw (IS).
METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus was performed for comparative studies between S2AI and IS for SPF. Two independent investigators selected qualified studies and extracted data indispensably. With 95% confidence intervals (CI), the odds ratio (OR) was applied to dichotomous outcomes and standardized mean difference (SMD) was applied to continuous outcomes for each item.
RESULTS: We included data from thirteen studies involving 722 patients (S2AI, 357 patients; IS, 365 patients). In the pediatric population, the S2AI group had a smaller pelvic obliquity (PO) than the IS group at final follow-up (SMD, - 0.38; 95% CI, - 0.72 to - 0.04). Patients who underwent S2AI screws showed reduced rates of re-operation (S2AI, 13%; IS, 28%), implant failure (S2AI, 12%; IS, 26%) [screw loosening (S2AI, 8%; IS, 20%); screw breakage (S2AI, 2%; IS, 12%)], implant prominence (S2AI, 2%; IS, 14%), pseudarthrosis (S2AI, 3%; IS, 15%), wound infection (S2AI, 8%; IS, 22%) and less blood loss (S2AI, 2035.4 ml; IS, 2708.4 ml).
CONCLUSION: Radiological outcomes indicate an effective maintenance of the correction and arrest of progression of deformity by S2AI, which is equal or better than IS. SPF with S2AI screw has obviously lower incidence of postoperative complications and less blood loss. Given these advantages, the S2AI screw seems to be a beneficial alternative to IS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Iliac screw; Radiological outcomes; S2-alar-iliac screw; Spinopelvic fixation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33987735     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06864-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  44 in total

Review 1.  Sacropelvic fixation: techniques and complications.

Authors:  Khaled M Kebaish
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Evolution of Sagittal Imbalance Following Corrective Surgery for Sagittal Plane Deformity.

Authors:  Michael M McDowell; Zachary J Tempel; Gurpreet S Gandhoke; Nicholas K Khattar; D Kojo Hamilton; Adam S Kanter; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Sacropelvic Fixation: When, Why, How?

Authors:  Joseph M Lombardi; Jamal N Shillingford; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Minimally invasive L5-S1 oblique lumbar interbody fusion with anterior plate.

Authors:  Martin H Pham; Andre M Jakoi; Patrick C Hsieh
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 5.  Diffusion tensor imaging with fiber tracking provides a valuable quantitative and clinical evaluation for compressed lumbosacral nerve roots: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weishi Liang; Bo Han; Yong Hai; Peng Yin; Yuxiang Chen; Congying Zou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Pelvic Fixation in Adult and Pediatric Spine Surgery: Historical Perspective, Indications, and Techniques: AAOS Exhibit Selection.

Authors:  Amit Jain; Hamid Hassanzadeh; Sophia A Strike; Emmanuel N Menga; Paul D Sponseller; Khaled M Kebaish
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Fusion to the sacrum for nonparalytic scoliosis in the adult.

Authors:  R A Balderston; R B Winter; J H Moe; D S Bradford; J E Lonstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Low profile pelvic fixation with the sacral alar iliac technique in the pediatric population improves results at two-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Paul D Sponseller; Ryan M Zimmerman; Phebe S Ko; Albert F Pull Ter Gunne; Ahmed S Mohamed; Tai-Li Chang; Khaled M Kebaish
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Progressive restoration of spinal sagittal balance after surgical correction of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis before skeletal maturity.

Authors:  Diala Thomas; Manon Bachy; Aurélien Courvoisier; Arnaud Dubory; Houssam Bouloussa; Raphaël Vialle
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-01-09
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  S2 alar-iliac screw versus traditional iliac screw for spinopelvic fixation: a systematic review of comparative biomechanical studies.

Authors:  Takashi Hirase; Caleb Shin; Jeremiah Ling; Brian Phelps; Varan Haghshenas; Comron Saifi; Darrell S Hanson
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  Surgical treatment of spinal deformities in spinal muscular atrophy: a single-center experience from China.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Erwei Feng; Yang Jiao; Jiachen Lin; Junduo Zhao; Weiyun Chen; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.721

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.