Literature DB >> 20688327

Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective.

J Ryan Martin1, Jason G Bromer, Denny Sakkas, Pasquale Patrizio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of mandated IVF insurance coverage on ET practices and resulting multiple pregnancy rates.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of all fresh, nondonor IVF cycles performed in the United States in 2006.
SETTING: United States. PATIENT(S): A total of 91,753 fresh, nondonor IVF cycles in the United States. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy rate, live-birth rate, embryos transferred, multiple pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): Overall, nonmandated states had a significantly higher pregnancy rate (38.8% vs. 35%) and live-birth rate (32.2% vs. 29.1%) than mandated states. Nonmandated states also had a significantly higher twin rate (28.1% vs. 26%) and triplet rate (3.9% vs. 3.4%). The average number of embryos transferred was also significantly higher in nonmandated states (2.6 vs. 2.2). These findings were more pronounced in the <35 and 35-37 age groups. CONCLUSION(S): In the last 8 years, despite a reduction in the average number of embryos transferred and multiple pregnancy rates, there is a continued association between mandated IVF coverage, the transfer of fewer embryos, and lower rates of multiple pregnancies and births, particularly in the younger age groups.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20688327     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  16 in total

Review 1.  "One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?": American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients.

Authors:  Pamela M White
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.

Authors:  Sara Crawford; Sheree L Boulet; Denise J Jamieson; Carol Stone; Jewel Mullen; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; Bradley J Van Voorhis; G David Ball
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Embryo transfer practices and perinatal outcomes by insurance mandate status.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Sara Crawford; Yujia Zhang; Saswati Sunderam; Bruce Cohen; Dana Bernson; Patricia McKane; Marie A Bailey; Denise J Jamieson; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Public Perceptions of Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Malaysia.

Authors:  Angelina P Olesen; Siti Nurani Mohd Nor; Latifah Amin; Anisah Che Ngah
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Epidemiology of twinning in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997 to 2007.

Authors:  April L Dawson; Sarah C Tinker; Denise J Jamieson; Charlotte A Hobbs; Sonja A Rasmussen; Jennita Reefhuis
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2014-10-31

7.  Diagnosis and treatment of diminished ovarian reserve in assisted reproductive technology cycles of women up to age 40 years: the role of insurance mandates.

Authors:  Samantha F Butts; Sarah Ratcliffe; Anuja Dokras; David B Seifer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Reproductive outcome of women 43 years and beyond undergoing ART treatment with their own oocytes in two Connecticut university programs.

Authors:  Mehmet B Cetinkaya; Linda J Siano; Claudio Benadiva; Denny Sakkas; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  A qualitative inquiry of the financial concerns of couples opting to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis to prevent the transmission of known genetic disorders.

Authors:  Kathryn T Drazba; Michele A Kelley; Patricia E Hershberger
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage.

Authors:  Abigail C Mancuso; Karen M Summers; Rebecca Chung; Ginny L Ryan; Aaron M Scherer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.