Literature DB >> 30130624

Low Referral Rate for Genetic Testing in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Patients Despite Universal Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Charles Muller1, Sang Mee Lee1, William Barge2, Shazia M Siddique3, Shivali Berera4, Gina Wideroff4, Rashmi Tondon3, Jeremy Chang1, Meaghan Peterson1, Jessica Stoll1, Bryson W Katona3, Daniel A Sussman4, Joshua Melson2, Sonia S Kupfer5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidelines recommend that all colorectal tumors be assessed for mismatch repair deficiency, which could increase identification of patients with Lynch syndrome. This is of particular importance for minority populations, in whom hereditary syndromes are under diagnosed. We compared rates and outcomes of testing all tumor samples (universal testing) collected from a racially and ethnically diverse population for features of Lynch syndrome.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of colorectal tumors tested from 2012 through 2016 at 4 academic centers. Tumor samples were collected from 767 patients with colorectal cancer (52% non-Hispanic white [NHW], 26% African American, and 17% Hispanic patients). We assessed rates of tumor testing, recommendations for genetic evaluation, rates of attending a genetic evaluation, and performance of germline testing overall and by race/ethnicity. We performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses.
RESULTS: Overall, 92% of colorectal tumors were analyzed for mismatch repair deficiency without significant differences among races/ethnicities. However, minority patients were significantly less likely to be referred for genetic evaluation (21.2% for NHW patients vs 16.9% for African American patients and 10.9% for Hispanic patients; P = .02). Rates of genetic testing were also lower among minority patients (10.7% for NHW patients vs 6.0% for AA patients and 3.1% for Hispanic patients; P < .01). On multivariate analysis, African American race, older age, and medical center were independently associated with lack of referral for genetic evaluation and genetic testing.
CONCLUSION: In a retrospective analysis, we found that despite similar rates of colorectal tumor analysis, minority patients are less likely to be recommended for genetic evaluation or to undergo germline testing for Lynch syndrome. Improvements in institutional practices in follow up after tumor testing could reduce barriers to diagnosis of Lynch diagnosis in minorities.
Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRC; Genetic Counseling; Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer; Mutation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30130624      PMCID: PMC6866232          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  52 in total

1.  Identification of individuals at risk for Lynch syndrome using targeted evaluations and genetic testing: National Society of Genetic Counselors and the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Colorectal Cancer joint practice guideline.

Authors:  Scott M Weissman; Randall Burt; James Church; Steve Erdman; Heather Hampel; Spring Holter; Kory Jasperson; Matt F Kalady; Joy Larsen Haidle; Henry T Lynch; Selvi Palaniappan; Paul E Wise; Leigha Senter
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Allison W Kurian; Monica Morrow; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Shared and independent colorectal cancer risk alleles in TGFβ-related genes in African and European Americans.

Authors:  Sonia S Kupfer; Andrew D Skol; Ellie Hong; Anton Ludvik; Rick A Kittles; Temitope O Keku; Robert S Sandler; Nathan A Ellis
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 4.  Sociodemographic, psychosocial and clinical factors associated with uptake of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  A M Willis; S K Smith; B Meiser; M L Ballinger; D M Thomas; M-A Young
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Reflex immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing of colorectal tumors for Lynch syndrome among US cancer programs and follow-up of abnormal results.

Authors:  Laura C Beamer; Marcia L Grant; Carin R Espenschied; Kathleen R Blazer; Heather L Hampel; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Deborah J MacDonald
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Colorectal cancer in African Americans.

Authors:  Sangeeta Agrawal; Anand Bhupinderjit; Manoop S Bhutani; Lisa Boardman; Cuong Nguyen; Yvonne Romero; Radhika Srinivasan; Radhika Srinvasan; Colmar Figueroa-Moseley
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Cost-effectiveness of microsatellite instability screening as a method for detecting hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S D Ramsey; L Clarke; R Etzioni; M Higashi; K Berry; N Urban
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Calculation of risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer among patients with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Elena Stoffel; Bhramar Mukherjee; Victoria M Raymond; Nabihah Tayob; Fay Kastrinos; Jennifer Sparr; Fei Wang; Prathap Bandipalliam; Sapna Syngal; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Identifying Lynch syndrome: we are all responsible.

Authors:  Julian A Sanchez; Jon D Vogel; Matthew F Kalady; Mary P Bronner; Marek Skacel; James M Church
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Perceived disadvantages and concerns about abuses of genetic testing for cancer risk: differences across African American, Latina and Caucasian women.

Authors:  Hayley S Thompson; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Lina Jandorf; William Redd
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-11
View more
  33 in total

1.  Inequities in multi-gene hereditary cancer testing: lower diagnostic yield and higher VUS rate in individuals who identify as Hispanic, African or Asian and Pacific Islander as compared to European.

Authors:  Mesaki K Ndugga-Kabuye; Rachel B Issaka
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Low Rates of Genetic Counseling and Testing in Individuals at Risk for Lynch Syndrome Reported in the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Nolan Faust; Charles Muller; Joshua Prenner; Sang Mee Lee; Sonia S Kupfer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Patterns of cancer family history and genetic counseling eligibility among African Americans with breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers: A Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort study.

Authors:  Kristen S Purrington; Ann G Schwartz; Julie J Ruterbusch; Mark A Manning; Mrudula Nair; Angela S Wenzlaff; Stephanie S Pandolfi; Michael S Simon; Jennifer Beebe-Dimmer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Associations of sociodemographic and clinical factors with gastrointestinal cancer risk assessment appointment completion.

Authors:  Jessica E Ebrahimzadeh; Jessica M Long; Louise Wang; John T Nathanson; Shazia Mehmood Siddique; Anil K Rustgi; David S Goldberg; Bryson W Katona
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Racial and ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing in the US: Systematic review.

Authors:  Juan R Canedo; Stephania T Miller; Hector F Myers; Maureen Sanderson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Precision Treatment and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer-Hope or Hype?

Authors:  Charles Muller; Matthew Yurgelun; Sonia S Kupfer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Germline Genetic Testing of Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Pooja Dharwadkar; Garrett Greenan; Elena M Stoffel; Ezra Burstein; Sara Pirzadeh-Miller; Sayoni Lahiri; Caitlin Mauer; Amit G Singal; Caitlin C Murphy
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 8.  Disparities in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Charles Muller; Ehizokha Ihionkhan; Elena M Stoffel; Sonia S Kupfer
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Lost opportunities for mismatch repair (MMR) screening among minority women with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Marilyn Huang; Tegan Hunter; Lydia A Fein; Johnny Galli; Sophia George; Matthew Schlumbrecht; Kelly McCarter; Abdulrahman K Sinno; Luiz P Guido; Andre Pinto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Cancer genetic testing in marginalized groups during an era of evolving healthcare reform.

Authors:  Stephen M Modell; Caitlin G Allen; Amy Ponte; Gail Marcus
Journal:  J Cancer Policy       Date:  2021-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.