Literature DB >> 28179178

Cranioplasty Outcomes and Analysis of the Factors Influencing Surgical Site Infection: A Retrospective Review of More than 10 Years of Institutional Experience.

Keita Shibahashi1, Hidenori Hoda2, Yuichi Takasu2, Kazuo Hanakawa3, Takafumi Ide3, Yuichi Hamabe2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As a large amount of clinical evidence supports the use of craniectomy, the frequency of subsequent cranioplasty is increasing. Conflicting complication rates and risk factors of cranioplasty have been reported. We reviewed >10 years of institutional experience to identify risk factors of surgical site infection (SSI) after cranioplasty.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent primary cranioplasty. Patients <16 years old, patients with a history of cranial infection, and patients who underwent ventricular shunt surgery were excluded. There were 155 patients eligible for analysis. Complication rate and the risk factors associated with SSI were determined.
RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 12.3%. There were 13 cases of SSI (8.4%), 4 cases of postoperative epidural hemorrhage (2.6%), and 2 cases of postoperative wound dehiscence (1.3%). There was a significant relationship between operative time and SSI (P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value of operative time for predicting SSI was 98 minutes, and the relative risk ratio was 7.4 in patients with an operative time of >98 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: A high number of complications can occur after cranioplasty. Close attention should be paid to SSI development in patients who require a long operative time.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Craniectomy; Cranioplasty; Risk factors; Surgical site infection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28179178     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  7 in total

1.  Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: minor surgical complexity but still high periprocedural complication rates.

Authors:  Ehab Shiban; Nicole Lange; Antonia Hauser; Ann-Kathrin Jörger; Arthur Wagner; Bernhard Meyer; Jens Lehmberg
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Risk factors for surgical site infections in neurosurgery.

Authors:  S Patel; D Thompson; S Innocent; V Narbad; R Selway; K Barkas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  The Materials Utilized in Cranial Reconstruction: Past, Current, and Future.

Authors:  Haley Meyer; Syed I Khalid; Amir H Dorafshar; Richard W Byrne
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 0.558

4.  Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Silicone Elastomer Sheet during Decompressive Craniectomy: Anti-Adhesive Role in Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Young Ha Kim; Chi Hyung Lee; Chang Hyeun Kim; Dong Wuk Son; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song; Soon Ki Sung
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-18

5.  Cryopreservation of autologous bone flaps following decompressive craniectomy: A new method reduced positive cultures without increase in post-cranioplasty infection rate.

Authors:  Sofia Melin; Ismene Haase; Martin Nilsson; Carina Claesson; Åse Östholm Balkhed; Lovisa Tobieson
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-07-22

6.  Japanese National Questionnaire Survey in 2018 on Complications Related to Cranial Implants in Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Takao Yasuhara; Satoshi Murai; Nobuhiro Mikuni; Susumu Miyamoto; Isao Date
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 7.  Complications of cranioplasty in relationship to traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David Shepetovsky; Gianluca Mezzini; Lorenzo Magrassi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.042

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.