Literature DB >> 28178882

Fluorescent Imaging With Indocyanine Green During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients at Increased Risk of Bile Duct Injury.

Marjolein Ankersmit1, Dieuwertje A van Dam1, Anne-Sophie van Rijswijk1, Baukje van den Heuvel1, Jurriaan B Tuynman1, Wilhelmus J H J Meijerink1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although rare, injury to the common bile duct (CBD) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) can be reduced by better intraoperative visualization of the cystic duct (CD) and CBD. The aim of this study was to establish the efficacy of early visualization of the CD and the added value of CBD identification, using near-infrared (NIR) light and the fluorescent agent indocyanine green (ICG), in patients at increased risk of bile duct injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with complicated cholecystitis and scheduled for LC were included. The CBD and CD were visualized with NIR light before and during dissection of the liver hilus and at critical view of safety (CVS).
RESULTS: Of the 20 patients originally included, 2 were later excluded due to conversion. In 6 of 18 patients, the CD was visualized early during dissection and prior to imaging with conventional white light. The CBD was additionally visualized with ICG-NIR in 7 of 18 patients. In 1 patient, conversion was prevented due to detection of the CD and CBD with ICG-NIR.
CONCLUSIONS: Early visualization of the CD or additional identification of the CBD using ICG-NIR in patients with complicated cholecystolithiasis can be helpful in preventing CBD injury. Future studies should attempt to establish the optimal dosage and time frame for ICG administration and bile duct visualization with respect to different gallbladder pathologies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  image-guided surgery; simulation; surgical education

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28178882      PMCID: PMC5431362          DOI: 10.1177/1553350617690309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


Introduction

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the standard surgical treatment for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis [1-4] and today is one of the most frequently performed procedures in general surgery.[5,6] Although laparoscopy improves postoperative outcomes compared with open surgery, bile duct injury is a rare but serious and persistent complication. The classic injury occurs when the common bile duct (CBD) is mistaken for the cystic duct (CD), resulting in (partial) CBD resection.[7] Bile duct injury is associated with high morbidity rates, prolonged hospital stay, challenging and extensive surgery, and a significant negative impact on quality of life even 10 years after the event.[8] Therefore, it is now strongly advised that the critical view of safety (CVS) must be met prior to clipping of any tubular structure.[9] However, and despite the widespread implementation of CVS, recent literature suggests that bile duct injury still occurs in 0.26% to 0.7% of procedures.[10-15] In addition, conversion to an open procedure is indicated in cases where CVS cannot be reached, with reported conversion-to-open rates in LC presently around 2.6% to 10%.[16-18] Conversion is often due to unclear (biliary) anatomy associated with a wider range of conditions including acute cholecystitis, acute biliary pancreatitis, bleeding in Calot’s triangle, fibrotic shrunken gallbladders due to previous infection, gallstones in Hartmann’s pouch, a short cystic duct, Mirizzi’s syndrome, or abnormal biliary anatomy.[17-20] Although the intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) was introduced in open cholecystectomy for diagnostic and therapeutic reasons, use of the procedure in LC also helps prevent bile duct injury by allowing real-time imaging of the bile ducts. However, the routine use of IOC in LC is controversial due to a number of drawbacks including significantly increased operating time, added costs, requirement for cannulation of the bile duct with a concomitant increased risk of bile duct injury, radiation exposure, misinterpretation and the need for additional equipment and trained personnel.[13,21-23] IOC is therefore not part of the standard operative procedure in every country. More recently, extensive investigation of fluorescent image-guided surgery has shown that the technique can improve the identification of certain anatomic structures. A number of studies have demonstrated that real-time fluorescent imaging, using indocyanine green (ICG) (ICG-Pulsion, Pulsion medical Systems AG, Munich, Germany) in combination with a near-infrared (NIR) camera, is a viable approach to real-time fluorescent identification of the bile ducts in uncomplicated cholecystolithiasis,[24-38] and without the disadvantages of IOC. Although real-time fluorescent imaging has clear potential in the enhanced visualization of the CBD in patients at risk for bile duct injury, the majority of the studies published to date actually excluded patients with acute cholecystitis, biliary pancreatitis, cholangitis, increased risk of common bile duct stones, and conversion to an open procedure. These patients in particular would potentially derive the greatest benefit from intraoperative identification of the CD and CBD, and improved imaging would help in the move toward safe LC. This study therefore sought to evaluate whether ICG-NIR facilitates earlier identification of the CD compared with conventional white light imaging in patients with complicated cholecystolithiasis. Furthermore, we also attempted to determine if ICG-NIR contributes to the additional identification of the CBD compared with conventional imaging in these cases.

Materials and Methods

Patients

All consecutive patients attending the outpatient clinic or the emergency room of the VU Medical Centre Amsterdam who met the inclusion criteria were asked to participate. Inclusion criteria were the following: age 18 years and older, scheduled for LC after complicated gallstone disease as indicated by an acute or chronic cholecystitis, biliary pancreatitis, percutaneous gallbladder drainage, choledocholithiasis without signs of CBD stones at surgery or after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP). Exclusion criteria were the following: isolated symptomatic cholelithiasis, iodine allergy, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism and use of listed medication interfering with hepatic ICG uptake as mentioned in the “Summary of Product Characteristics” (SPC) of ICG-Pulsion (anticonvulsive medication, cyclopropane, bisulphate connections, sodium bisulfite haloperidol, diamorphine, pethidine, morphine, nitrofurantoin, opium alkaloids, phenobarbital, phenylbutazon, probenicid, metamizole, rifamycin, methadone, or heroin). The study protocol was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, approved by the institutional ethics committee of the VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam and registered in the Dutch Trial Registration register (NTR 4680).

Indocyanine Green

Indocyanine green is a fluorescent contrast agent with a peak emission of 830 nm when assessed with NIR light. Following intravenous injection, ICG becomes protein-bound and is excreted exclusively by the liver into the bile without entering the enterohepatic circulation.[39-41] ICG is pharmacologically inactive, is not metabolized, and has been successfully and safely used in the assessment of liver function, arterial microcirculation, tissue perfusion, ophthalmic imaging, and imaging of the bile ducts during uncomplicated cholecystolithiasis.

Near-Infrared Laparoscopic Camera

The NIR camera used for this study was developed by Olympus (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). A filter was designed to fit a rigid 0° laparoscope with a 10 mm diameter (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Using a lever, the image from the laparoscopic camera can be switched from conventional laparoscopic imaging to NIR imaging. The excitation barrier filter only admits light with a wavelength above 800 nm. Using the NIR camera, all fluorescent structures are displayed in green against a black (non-fluorescent) background. The NIR camera system in conjunction with ICG-enhanced fluorescence has already been used during a number of laparoscopic procedures including LC and sentinel lymph node imaging in colorectal cancer.[28,42,43]

Surgical Procedures

Patients were scheduled and prepared according to the standard preoperative protocol for elective or acute LC, depending on the indication for surgery. In the operating room, directly after the time-out procedure and induction of general anesthesia, patients received an intravenous bolus of 0.2 mg/kg ICG diluted in water for intravenous injection. During the cholecystectomy, a conventional laparoscopic camera (EndoEye, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and a NIR camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) were used and the image modes were switched during the surgical procedure. The NIR scope was used at set points during surgery (further referred to as “look”) to visualize the fluorescent bile ducts, in particular the CD and the CBD. The first look performed in all patients, attempt to visualize the fluorescent bile ducts (first look) after incising the peritoneal fold in the hilus of the gallbladder and before dissection of Calot’s triangle. If the CD could not be visualized at the start of dissection, a second look with the NIR scope followed at an early point during dissection but before skeletonizing of structures. In all patients, a third look with the NIR laparoscope was performed when CVS was reached with conventional imaging, to identify fluorescent bile ducts. Bile ducts, visualized by either NIR or conventional white-light imaging, were identified by the operating surgeon, the assisting surgeon and the attending investigator. The visualized structures and time of observation were noted on the case record form. The LC was performed in accordance with Dutch protocols, including achievement of CVS. An IOC was not performed since this is not part of standard LC in the majority of the hospitals in The Netherlands, including our hospital. After surgery, patients recovered on the surgical ward and were discharged according to standard post-operative procedures.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS software (SPSS version 20.0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Continuous data are expressed as the median (minimum-maximum). The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to determine the statistical significance between groups with and without bile duct visualization with ICG-NIR. Results were considered statistically significant when P < .05.

Results

Following receipt of oral and written informed consent, 20 patients scheduled for LC were included in the study. The group included 13 males and 7 females, with a mean age of 65 (range 26-82) years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.45 (range 16.8-38.0) kg/m2. Two patients required early conversion to an open procedure due to dense adhesions as a result of acute cholecystitis. One of these patients had already undergone percutaneous gallbladder drainage and ERCP. Both patients were excluded from further analysis (Table 1).
Table 1.

Patient Characteristics (N = 20).

Male:Female13:7
Age, years, median (min-max)65 (26-82)
Body mass index, kg/m2, median (min-max)25.45 (16.8-38.0)
ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists)
 I7
 II10
 III3
Conversion2
Patient Characteristics (N = 20). Eighteen patients were included in the analysis (Table 2). Three patients suffered from biliary pancreatitis, one of whom had a complicated history of necrotizing biliary pancreatitis with renal failure and neuropathy, resulting in a prolonged stay at the intensive care unit before surgery (patient 1). Seven patients were diagnosed with acute cholecystitis. Seven patients were diagnosed with choledocholithiasis, of whom one had undergone a prior magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP; patient 2), 4 patients a single ERCP (patients 3, 6, 7, 16), 1 patient 2 ERCPs (patient 10), and 1 patient 3 ERCPs (patient 14) before surgery.
Table 2.

Identification of the Cystic Duct (CD) and Common Bile Duct (CBD) by Conventional Imaging and ICG-NIR During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

First Observation
Second Observation
CVS
NoDiagnosisConventional imagingICG-NIRConventional ImagingICG-NIRConventional ImagingICG-NIR
1Biliary pancreatitisCD + CBD××CDCD + CBD
2Choledocholithiasis[a]CDCDCD + CBD
3Choledocholithiasis[b]××CDCD + CBD
4Acute cholecystitisCD
5Acute cholecystitisCBD××CDCD + CBD
6Choledocholithiasis[b]××CD + CBDCD + CBD
7Choledocholithiasis[b]CDCD××CDCD
8Acute cholecystitisCD××CDCD
9Acute cholecystitisCDCD
10Choledocholithiasis[c]CDCD + CBDCD + CBDCD + CBD
11CholangitisCD××CDCD
12Acute cholecystitis××CDCD
13Acute cholecystitis××CD
14Choledocholithiasis[d]CD+CBDCD + CBDCD + CBD
15Biliary pancreatitis[b]CD××CD
16Choledocholithiasis[b]CD
17Acute cholecystitisCD××CDCD
18Biliary pancreatitis××CDCD

Abbreviations: CVS, critical view of safety; ICG, indocyanine green; NIR, near-infrared; −, not visible; ×, no second look performed.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography.

Two times endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography.

Three times endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography.

Identification of the Cystic Duct (CD) and Common Bile Duct (CBD) by Conventional Imaging and ICG-NIR During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Abbreviations: CVS, critical view of safety; ICG, indocyanine green; NIR, near-infrared; −, not visible; ×, no second look performed. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography. Two times endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography. Three times endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography. The average time between injection of ICG and the first look with the NIR camera was 30 (range 20-72) minutes. At first look, the CD was observed in 3 of 18 patients using conventional white-light imaging and in 4 of 18 with ICG-NIR (Table 2). In 1 patient, the CD could be visualized with both conventional white light and ICG-NIR imaging. The CBD was visible in 2 of 18 patients using ICG-NIR. These structures could not be visualized with white light at this time point (Table 2). In the remaining 11 patients, no bile ducts could be visualized at first look. In the protocol a second look was planned for these patients early in dissection but before skeletonizing of structures. As CVS was reached quickly after the first look in 5 of the 11 patients, a second look was performed in just 6 patients. At second look, the CD could be visualized with both imaging modalities in 1 of 6 patients, and visualized only with conventional white light in a further 2 patients. In 2 patients, the CD and CBD could be visualized only with ICG-NIR. In the final patient (patient 14), anatomy was unclear with white light. Visualization of the CD and CBD with ICG-NIR during second look aided the surgeon and prevented conversion to an open procedure. Overall, CVS was reached 51 (range 10-117) minutes after ICG injection. At CVS, the CD could be identified in all 18 patients using conventional white light, whereas the CBD could be identified in only 3 of 18 patients. Using ICG-NIR imaging, the CD was identified in 13 of 18 patients, and the CBD could be identified in 7 of 18 patients, all of whom also showed a fluorescent cystic duct (Table 3).
Table 3.

Bile Duct Imaging With Conventional and Indocyanine Green Near-Infrared (ICG-NIR) Imaging at Each “Look.”

Look 1[a]Look 2[b]Look 3[c]
No. of patients186[d]18
Time after ICG injection, minutes, median (min-max)30 (20-72)70 (28-91)51 (10-117)
Bile duct imaging7418
Conventional imaging
 Cystic duct (CD)3318
 Common bile duct (CBD)003
 No visualization of bile ducts1530
ICG-NIR imaging
 Cystic duct (CD)4213
 Common bile duct (CBD)227
 No visualization of bile ducts1345

After incising the peritoneal fold in the hilus of the gallbladder and before dissection of Calot’s triangle.

After the first look before skeletonizing of structures and only performed if the cystic duct could not be visualized at the first look.

When critical view of safety was reached with conventional imaging.

A second look was planned in 11 patients but performed in just 6 patients. In 5 patients, critical view of safety was reached quickly after the first look before a second look could have been performed.

Bile Duct Imaging With Conventional and Indocyanine Green Near-Infrared (ICG-NIR) Imaging at Each “Look.” After incising the peritoneal fold in the hilus of the gallbladder and before dissection of Calot’s triangle. After the first look before skeletonizing of structures and only performed if the cystic duct could not be visualized at the first look. When critical view of safety was reached with conventional imaging. A second look was planned in 11 patients but performed in just 6 patients. In 5 patients, critical view of safety was reached quickly after the first look before a second look could have been performed. When comparing patients with a cystic duct of common bile duct identified by ICG-NIR at CVS to patients in whom no fluorescent bile ducts were identified at CVS, no differences were apparent with regard to age, BMI, or duration of symptoms before surgery (Table 4). Average total operating time was 82.5 (range 45-128) minutes, and this did not differ between patients with and without fluorescent bile duct imaging (Table 4). Time between ICG injection and first look).
Table 4.

Characteristics of Patients With and Without ICG-NIR Imaging of the Bile Ducts at CVS.

ICG-NIR IdentificationNo ICG-NIR Identification P
No. of patients135
Age, years, median (min-max)65 (39-82)65 (26-73).964
BMI, kg/m2, median (min-max)25 (16.8-32.4)25.6 (19.4-33.0).750
Diagnosis
 Cholecystitis acuta43
 Biliary pancreatitis21
 Choledocholithiasis61
 Cholangitis10
Time symptoms to operation, days, median (min-max)75 (2-714)2 (2-238).213
First look, minutes, median (min-max)30 (20-72)42 (23-57).750
CVS, minutes, median (min-max)49 (25-117)60 (10-101).892
Operating time, minutes, median (min-max)75 (45-128)90 (50-120).892

Abbreviations: CVS, critical view of safety; ICG, indocyanine green; NIR, near-infrared.

Characteristics of Patients With and Without ICG-NIR Imaging of the Bile Ducts at CVS. Abbreviations: CVS, critical view of safety; ICG, indocyanine green; NIR, near-infrared. Time between ICG injection and first look and the time between injection and CVS were also comparable between groups. between groups. This suggests that there were no significant differences in terms of difficulty of the surgical procedure between the patients with and without ICG-NIR bile duct imaging. No bile duct injuries occurred in the cohort and no other complications arose. In addition, no anatomical variations of the biliary tree were identified.

Discussion

This study was designed to assess the practicality and usefulness of ICG-NIR in early identification of the CD and the additional imaging of the CBD, compared with conventional white-light imaging, during LC in patients with complicated cholecystolithiasis. Fluorescent imaging of the CD was possible in the majority of the cases at CVS, and improved the identification of the CBD compared to conventional white-light imaging. In 1 patient, it was even possible to prevent conversion by detecting the CD and CBD with ICG-NIR before CVS was reached. However, we should emphasize that the number of patients included in the study was small and earlier CD identification by ICG-NIR was only possible in a few of these patients. Second, overall visualization rates of the CD and CBD with NIR fluorescence were much lower than the visualization rates described for uncomplicated cases of cholecystolithiasis.[24-38] The diminished visualization of the bile ducts with ICG-NIR in the patient population presented here may have been due to severe edema or dense adhesions as a result of an acute or past inflammation or an intervention such as ERCP.[26,33,34] It is important to bear in mind that the penetration depth of ICG is limited (±1.0 cm) and is probably insufficient for visualization of the bile ducts when covered by thickened tissue. This phenomenon is also suspected in obese patients (BMI >30 kg/m2), in which case the bile ducts are covered by a fatty peritoneum. In agreement with current literature, we did not find significant differences in BMI in our patients in relation to successful or unsuccessful imaging of bile duct structures.[44] We hypothesize that other patient and surgical-related factors, including inflamed tissue, may interfere with and influence the success rate of fluorescence visualization of the bile ducts in complicated cases. Important unresolved issues regarding the ICG-NIR technique are the large disparities in time intervals to imaging following injection of ICG and the wide variation in dosages. In current literature, the reported timing of ICG injection in uncomplicated cholecystolithiasis varies between 30 and 60 minutes prior to start of surgery until after endotracheal intubation. Whether a prolonged interval (up to 24 hours) improves visualization is not yet known. In terms of dosage, in the present study we used 0.2 mg/kg, which is in the range of a bolus of 2.5 mg in total up to 0.5 mg/kg used in described in current literature. Based on our earlier (satisfactory) results in uncomplicated cases and for logistical reasons, ICG was injected directly after induction of general anesthesia.[28] Our final look in all patients at CVS was reached at a median of 51 ( 10-117) minutes after ICG administration. Bearing in mind the low visualization rates of bile ducts in our study, particularly compared with uncomplicated cases, we presume that dosage and time frame are decisive and crucial for the effectiveness of CD and CBD NIR fluorescence imaging in patients with complicated gallbladder pathologies. With normal liver function, 95% of ICG is captured by hepatocytes within 15 minutes of injection and excreted into the bile.[45] In patients with decreased liver function, removal of ICG from blood to bile is delayed. This suggests that earlier injection of ICG could improve detection rates of the CD and CBD in complicated cases. Verbeek et al[46] have shown, in uncomplicated cases, that optimal visualization of the bile ducts is achieved by injection (10 mg ICG) 24 hours prior to surgery and is due to an increased contrast ratio of CBD versus liver background. These authors argued that administration of ICG should be performed as early as possible in all patients to allow optimal clearance of the contrast agent from the liver before undertaking NIR fluorescence-assisted LC. However, this regime would be challenging in the case of elective LC and in patients suffering from acute cholecystitis requiring early surgery. Four studies to date have described (small) patient cohorts in which ICG-NIR bile duct imaging was used in LC due to complicated cholecystitis.[26,32,33,47] The most complicated cases included in these studies were patients with acute cholecystitis. The CD and CBD visualization rates described in these studies were significantly higher than those found in our study (91.6% to 100% and 72% to 79.1% versus 72% and 38%, respectively). With the exception of patient selection, these studies show no great differences in timing and dosage compared to our study, thus suggesting that patient pathology influences the efficacy of ICG. It is presently unclear whether this phenomenon can be attributed to delayed clearance of ICG from blood to bile due to decreased liver clearance, as described above. Therefore, future studies should attempt to establish optimal dosages and timeframes for ICG administration and bile duct visualization, taking into account both the various gallbladder pathologies and feasibility in daily surgical practice.

Conclusion

NIR fluorescence-assisted LC has the potential to become a standard surgical procedure. Early visualization of the cystic duct and additional imaging of the CBD may increase safety in LC and might offer an alternative to the intraoperative cholangiogram in patients with an increased risk of CBD injury. In contrast to the ease and efficiency of CD and CBD detection by fluorescent imaging in uncomplicated cases, gallbladder pathology appears to create a much more challenging and complex situation. Further research is needed to optimize techniques, dosage, timing, and patient selection in order to establish whether ICG-NIR can help prevent and manage bile duct injury, and whether there is a place for routine use of fluorescent imaging in those patients at increased risk of bile duct injury during LC.
  47 in total

1.  To 'gram or not'? Indications for intraoperative cholangiogram.

Authors:  Lawrence E Tabone; Sharfi Sarker; Piero M Fisichella; Molly Conlon; Emil Fernando; Sophia Yi; Fred A Luchette
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Light-absorbing properties, stability, and spectral stabilization of indocyanine green.

Authors:  M L Landsman; G Kwant; G A Mook; W G Zijlstra
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Randomized clinical trial of routine on-table cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  O A Khan; S Balaji; G Branagan; D H Bennett; N Davies
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies.

Authors:  Gennaro Nuzzo; Felice Giuliante; Ivo Giovannini; Francesco Ardito; Fabrizio D'Acapito; Maria Vellone; Marino Murazio; Giovanni Capelli
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-10

5.  Fluorescence cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a feasibility study on early biliary tract delineation.

Authors:  Rutger M Schols; Nicole D Bouvy; Ad A M Masclee; Ronald M van Dam; Cornelis H C Dejong; Laurents P S Stassen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Real-time near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography could shorten operative time during robotic single-site cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Dan E Azagury; Minoa Jung; Francesco Volonte; Monika E Hagen; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Effectiveness of intraoperative cholangiography using indocyanine green (versus contrast fluid) for the correct assessment of extrahepatic bile ducts during day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  F Prevot; L Rebibo; C Cosse; F Browet; C Sabbagh; J-M Regimbeau
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Sentinel node procedure of the sigmoid using indocyanine green: feasibility study in a goat model.

Authors:  M H G M van der Pas; G A M S van Dongen; F Cailler; A Pèlegrin; W J H J Meijerink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates two decades later.

Authors:  Sujit Vijay Sakpal; Supreet Singh Bindra; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Clinical applications of indocyanine green (ICG) enhanced fluorescence in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Luigi Boni; Giulia David; Alberto Mangano; Gianlorenzo Dionigi; Stefano Rausei; Sebastiano Spampatti; Elisa Cassinotti; Abe Fingerhut
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  [Intraoperative fluorescence angiography and cholangiography with indocyanine green in hepatobiliary surgery].

Authors:  Karl J Oldhafer; Tim Reese; Mohammad Fard-Aghaie; Alina Strohmaier; Georgios Makridis; Alexandros Kantas; Kim C Wagner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Role of indo-cyanine green (ICG) fluorescence in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a retrospective review of 55 Cases.

Authors:  Eham Arora; Ajay Bhandarwar; Amol Wagh; Saurabh Gandhi; Chintan Patel; Shubham Gupta; Gagandeep Talwar; Jasmine Agarwal; Jai Rathore; Soumya Chatnalkar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Fluorescence Image-Guided Surgery - a Perspective on Contrast Agent Development.

Authors:  Connor W Barth; Summer L Gibbs
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-02-19

Review 4.  Bile Duct Injury after Cholecystectomy: Surgical Therapy.

Authors:  Bernhard W Renz; Florian Bösch; Martin K Angele
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-05-26

5.  Routine near infra-red indocyanine green fluorescent cholangiography versus intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case-matched comparison.

Authors:  Silvia Quaresima; Andrea Balla; Livia Palmieri; Ardit Seitaj; Abe Fingerhut; Pietro Ursi; Alessandro M Paganini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Fluorescence Guided Cholecystectomy by a Single Group: Initial 47 Procedures Experience in Mexico.

Authors:  Ariel de Jesus Martinez-Onate; Alan de Jesus Martinez-Salas; Vania Cazares-Garcia
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

Review 7.  Systematic review of the role of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence in safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Review).

Authors:  Dragos Serban; Dumitru Cristinel Badiu; Dragos Davitoiu; Ciprian Tanasescu; Mihail Silviu Tudosie; Alexandru Dan Sabau; Ana Maria Dascalu; Corneliu Tudor; Simona Andreea Balasescu; Bogdan Socea; Daniel Ovidiu Costea; Anca Zgura; Andreea Cristina Costea; Laura Carina Tribus; Catalin Gabriel Smarandache
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Clinically translatable formulation strategies for systemic administration of nerve-specific probes.

Authors:  Connor W Barth; Vidhi M Shah; Lei G Wang; Alexander L Antaris; Alwin Klaassen; Jonathan Sorger; Deepa A Rao; Darcy A Kerr; Eric R Henderson; Adam W G Alani; Summer L Gibbs
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2021-05-13

9.  Optimizing the image of fluorescence cholangiography using ICG: a systematic review and ex vivo experiments.

Authors:  Jacqueline van den Bos; Fokko P Wieringa; Nicole D Bouvy; Laurents P S Stassen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  A practical guide for the use of indocyanine green and methylene blue in fluorescence-guided abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Labrinus van Manen; Henricus J M Handgraaf; Michele Diana; Jouke Dijkstra; Takeaki Ishizawa; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Jan Sven David Mieog
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-06-24       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.