Literature DB >> 2817858

In vitro activities of several new macrolide antibiotics against Mycobacterium avium complex.

S Naik1, R Ruck.   

Abstract

The in vitro activities of 12 macrolide compounds against 28 Mycobacterium avium complex strains isolated from patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome were determined by the conventional proportion method and by the BACTEC method. Clarithromycin (A-56268; TE-031), a new macrolide compound, was the most active agent tested, inhibiting 90% of strains at an MIC of 4 micrograms/ml by the BACTEC method. Roxithromycin (RU 28965) and erythromycylamine inhibited 90% of strains at 16 micrograms/ml. The organisms showed high levels of resistance to most other macrolide compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2817858      PMCID: PMC172713          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.33.9.1614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  13 in total

1.  Comparative in vitro activity of the new macrolide A-56268 against mycobacteria.

Authors:  O G Berlin; L S Young; S A Floyd-Reising; D A Bruckner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  In vitro comparison of the activity of RU 28965, a new macrolide, with that of erythromycin against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  T Barlam; H C Neu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Evaluation of rapid radiometric method for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  S H Siddiqi; J P Libonati; G Middlebrook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Treatment of disease due to Mycobacterium intracellulare.

Authors:  P T Davidson; V Khanijo; M Goble; T S Moulding
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct

5.  Evaluation of the BACTEC radiometric method for recovery of mycobacteria and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from acid-fast smear-positive specimens.

Authors:  G D Roberts; N L Goodman; L Heifets; H W Larsh; T H Lindner; J K McClatchy; M R McGinnis; S H Siddiqi; P Wright
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  MYCOBACTERIA: LABORATORY METHODS FOR TESTING DRUG SENSITIVITY AND RESISTANCE.

Authors:  G CANETTI; S FROMAN; J GROSSET; P HAUDUROY; M LANGEROVA; H T MAHLER; G MEISSNER; D A MITCHISON; L SULA
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1963       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  In vitro activity of A-56268 (TE-031), a new macrolide antibiotic, compared with that of erythromycin and other antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  S Floyd-Reising; J A Hindler; L S Young
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In vitro susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium to a new macrolide (RU-28965).

Authors:  M Casal; F Rodriguez; R Villalba
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.544

9.  Use of the BACTEC system for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. kansasii, and M. avium complex.

Authors:  J E Steadham; S K Stall; J L Simmank
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  Determination of ansamycin MICs for Mycobacterium avium complex in liquid medium by radiometric and conventional methods.

Authors:  L B Heifets; M D Iseman; P J Lindholm-Levy; W Kanes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  35 in total

1.  In vitro susceptibility of Mycobacterium kansasii to clarithromycin.

Authors:  J Biehle; S J Cavalieri
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  AIDS and the lung: update 1992. 2. Recent developments in the management of the pulmonary complications of HIV disease.

Authors:  D M Mitchell; R F Miller
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Extracellular and intracellular activities of clarithromycin used alone and in association with ethambutol and rifampin against Mycobacterium avium complex.

Authors:  N Rastogi; V Labrousse
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Comparative tolerability of erythromycin and newer macrolide antibacterials in paediatric patients.

Authors:  N Principi; S Esposito
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Spectrum of activity of azithromycin.

Authors:  J D Williams
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Clarithromycin therapy of experimental Treponema pallidum infections in hamsters.

Authors:  J Alder; K Jarvis; M Mitten; N L Shipkowitz; P Gupta; J Clement
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Activity of clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex infection in beige mice.

Authors:  S P Klemens; M S DeStefano; M H Cynamon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparison of the intracellular activities of clarithromycin and erythromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex strains in J774 cells and in alveolar macrophages from human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals.

Authors:  D M Yajko; P S Nassos; C A Sanders; P C Gonzalez; W K Hadley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Clarithromycin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex infection in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome.

Authors:  L B Barradell; G L Plosker; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  In vitro activity of roxithromycin against 16 species of atypical mycobacteria and effect of pH on its radiometric MICs.

Authors:  N Rastogi; K S Goh; A Bryskier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.