Literature DB >> 28177118

Noncontingent reinforcement for the treatment of severe problem behavior: An analysis of 27 consecutive applications.

Cara L Phillips1, Julia A Iannaccone1, Griffin W Rooker2, Louis P Hagopian2.   

Abstract

Noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) is a commonly used treatment for severe problem behavior displayed by individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The current study sought to extend the literature by reporting outcomes achieved with 27 consecutive applications of NCR as the primary treatment for severe problem behavior. All applications of NCR were included regardless of treatment outcome to minimize selection bias favoring successful cases. Participants ranged in age from 5 to 33 years. We analyzed the results across behavioral function and with regard to the use of functional versus alternative reinforcers. NCR effectively treated problem behavior maintained by social reinforcement in 14 of 15 applications, using either the functional reinforcer or alternative reinforcers. When we implemented NCR to treat problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement, we often had to add other treatment components to produce clinically significant effects (five of nine applications). Results provide information on the effectiveness and limitations of NCR as treatment for severe problem behavior.
© 2017 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  consecutive case series; intellectual disabilities; noncontingent reinforcement; problem behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28177118      PMCID: PMC8793041          DOI: 10.1002/jaba.376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  48 in total

1.  "Work ethic" in pigeons: reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward.

Authors:  T S Clement; J R Feltus; D H Kaiser; T R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  A review of "noncontingent" reinforcement as treatment for the aberrant behavior of individuals with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  J E Carr; S Coriaty; D A Wilder; B T Gaunt; C L Dozier; L N Britton; C Avina; C L Reed
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

3.  Effects of alternative responses on behavior exposed to noncontingent reinforcement.

Authors:  Javier Virues-Ortega; Brian A Iwata; Tara A Fahmie; Jill M Harper
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2013-08-12

Review 4.  Use of noncontingent reinforcement in the treatment of challenging behavior. A review and clinical guide.

Authors:  M Tucker; J Sigafoos; H Bushell
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  1998-10

5.  A comparison of noncontingent reinforcement and sensory extinction as treatments for self-injurious behavior.

Authors:  E M Roscoe; B A Iwata; H L Goh
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

6.  Meta-analysis of noncontingent reinforcement effects on problem behavior.

Authors:  David M Richman; Lucy Barnard-Brak; Laura Grubb; Amanda Bosch; Layla Abby
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2015

7.  Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training.

Authors:  G P Hanley; B A Iwata; R H Thompson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

8.  Noncontingent escape as treatment for self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; B A Marcus; J E Ringdahl
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

9.  Do children prefer contingencies? An evaluation of the efficacy of and preference for contingent versus noncontingent social reinforcement during play.

Authors:  Kevin C Luczynski; Gregory P Hanley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

Review 10.  Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.

Authors:  Kerry Dwan; Carrol Gamble; Paula R Williamson; Jamie J Kirkham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Correspondence between Fail-Safe k and Dual-Criteria Methods: Analysis of Data Series Stability.

Authors:  John Michael Falligant; Michael P Kranak; Jonathan D Schmidt; Griffin W Rooker
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-05-20

Review 2.  Behavioral treatment of automatically reinforced SIB: 1982 - 2015.

Authors:  Griffin W Rooker; Andrew C Bonner; Christopher M Dillon; Jennifer R Zarcone
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2018-07-10

3.  Further Analysis of Advanced Quantitative Methods and Supplemental Interpretative Aids with Single-Case Experimental Designs.

Authors:  John Michael Falligant; Michael P Kranak; Louis P Hagopian
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-10-22

4.  Investigations of operant ABA renewal during differential reinforcement.

Authors:  Ryan T Kimball; Brian D Greer; Kayla R Randall; Adam M Briggs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Treatment of severe problem behaviour in children with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Eli T Newcomb; Louis P Hagopian
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2018-03-14

6.  Using Principles from Applied Behaviour Analysis to Address an Undesired Behaviour: Functional Analysis and Treatment of Jumping Up in Companion Dogs.

Authors:  Nicole Pfaller-Sadovsky; Gareth Arnott; Camilo Hurtado-Parrado
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The consecutive controlled case series: Design, data-analytics, and reporting methods supporting the study of generality.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2020-03-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.