| Literature DB >> 24114223 |
Javier Virues-Ortega1, Brian A Iwata, Tara A Fahmie, Jill M Harper.
Abstract
Noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) may decrease the frequency of behavior by either inducing satiation or terminating the response-reinforcer contingency (extinction). Another possibility is that the target behavior is replaced by other behaviors maintained by preexisting contingencies. We conducted 2 experiments in which we allowed access to a target response and several alternatives. In Experiment 1, NCR, preceded by contingent reinforcement (CR) for the target, produced a reduction in the target and an increase in the alternatives in 2 subjects with intellectual disabilities. To separate the effects of NCR from the availability of alternative responses, we presented CR conditions to 4 subjects in Experiment 2 with and without the availability of alternatives. The availability of alternatives decreased the target in only 1 subject. Subsequent manipulations showed that reductions in the target were solely a function of NCR for the other 3 subjects. Thus, response competition may have marginal effects on response suppression during NCR. © Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.Keywords: alternative response; noncontingent reinforcement; preference assessment
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24114223 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.61
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Behav Anal ISSN: 0021-8855