Daniel S Peterson1, Charles Van Liew2, Samuel Stuart3, Patricia Carlson-Kuhta4, Fay B Horak4, Martina Mancini4. 1. Arizona State University, College of Health Solutions, Phoenix, AZ, USA; VA Phoenix Health Care Systems, Phoenix, AZ, USA. Electronic address: daniel.peterson1@asu.edu. 2. Arizona State University, College of Health Solutions, Phoenix, AZ, USA. 3. Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. 4. Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Neurology, Portland, OR, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: People with PD who exhibit freezing of gait (FOG) also exhibit poor balance compared to those who do not freeze. However, balance is a broad construct that can be subdivided into subdomains that include dynamic balance (gait), anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) & gait initiation, postural sway in stance, and automatic postural responses (e.g., reactive stepping). Few studies have provided a robust investigation on how each of these domains is impacted by FOG, and no studies have compared balance across groups while rigorously controlling for disease severity. METHODS: Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the relationships between FOG and balance domains constructed as latent variables and controlling for disease severity. Domains included: dynamic balance (gait), APAs, postural sway, and reactive stepping. Models were run relating domains to both the presence and severity of FOG. RESULTS: Latent variables reflecting domains of Gait and APAs, but not postural sway or reactive stepping, were significantly related to the severity of FOG. Models for presence of FOG showed the same results, as Gait and APAs, but not postural sway or reactive stepping, were related to presence of FOG. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with hypotheses that balance deficits in people with PD who freeze are most pronounced in gait and anticipatory postural adjustments. Reactive stepping and postural sway domains are less effected in PD patients who freeze compared to those who do not. These findings suggest that rehabilitative strategies focused on gait and APAs may be most effective for people with PD who freeze. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
BACKGROUND: People with PD who exhibit freezing of gait (FOG) also exhibit poor balance compared to those who do not freeze. However, balance is a broad construct that can be subdivided into subdomains that include dynamic balance (gait), anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) & gait initiation, postural sway in stance, and automatic postural responses (e.g., reactive stepping). Few studies have provided a robust investigation on how each of these domains is impacted by FOG, and no studies have compared balance across groups while rigorously controlling for disease severity. METHODS: Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the relationships between FOG and balance domains constructed as latent variables and controlling for disease severity. Domains included: dynamic balance (gait), APAs, postural sway, and reactive stepping. Models were run relating domains to both the presence and severity of FOG. RESULTS: Latent variables reflecting domains of Gait and APAs, but not postural sway or reactive stepping, were significantly related to the severity of FOG. Models for presence of FOG showed the same results, as Gait and APAs, but not postural sway or reactive stepping, were related to presence of FOG. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with hypotheses that balance deficits in people with PD who freeze are most pronounced in gait and anticipatory postural adjustments. Reactive stepping and postural sway domains are less effected in PD patients who freeze compared to those who do not. These findings suggest that rehabilitative strategies focused on gait and APAs may be most effective for people with PD who freeze. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Freezing of gait; Gait; Parkinson's disease; Postural instability; Posture
Authors: Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: M Amboni; F Stocchi; G Abbruzzese; L Morgante; M Onofrj; S Ruggieri; M Tinazzi; M Zappia; M Attar; D Colombo; L Simoni; A Ori; P Barone; A Antonini Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: E M J Bekkers; B W Dijkstra; E Heremans; S M P Verschueren; B R Bloem; A Nieuwboer Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: John G Nutt; Bastiaan R Bloem; Nir Giladi; Mark Hallett; Fay B Horak; Alice Nieuwboer Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Matthew J Georgiades; James M Shine; Moran Gilat; Jacqueline McMaster; Brian Owler; Neil Mahant; Simon J G Lewis Journal: Brain Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: L A King; D S Peterson; M Mancini; P Carlson-Kuhta; B W Fling; K Smulders; J G Nutt; M Dale; J Carter; K M Winters-Stone; F B Horak Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2015-10-24 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Esther M J Bekkers; Sam Van Rossom; Elke Heremans; Kim Dockx; Surendar Devan; Sabine M P Verschueren; Alice Nieuwboer Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Jason K Longhurst; John V Rider; Jeffrey L Cummings; Samantha E John; Brach Poston; Elissa C Held Bradford; Merrill R Landers Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 4.895
Authors: Simon Lewis; Stewart Factor; Nir Giladi; Alice Nieuwboer; John Nutt; Mark Hallett Journal: Transl Neurodegener Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 9.883
Authors: Hyejin Choi; Changhong Youm; Hwayoung Park; Bohyun Kim; Sang-Myung Cheon; Myeounggon Lee Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-25 Impact factor: 4.614