Literature DB >> 28168959

The bending stiffness of shoes is beneficial to running energetics if it does not disturb the natural MTP joint flexion.

Keonyoung Oh1, Sukyung Park2.   

Abstract

A local minimum for running energetics has been reported for a specific bending stiffness, implying that shoe stiffness assists in running propulsion. However, the determinant of the metabolic optimum remains unknown. Highly stiff shoes significantly increase the moment arm of the ground reaction force (GRF) and reduce the leverage effect of joint torque at ground push-off. Inspired by previous findings, we hypothesized that the restriction of the natural metatarsophalangeal (MTP) flexion caused by stiffened shoes and the corresponding joint torque changes may reduce the benefit of shoe bending stiffness to running energetics. We proposed the critical stiffness, kcr, which is defined as the ratio of the MTP joint (MTPJ) torque to the maximal MTPJ flexion angle, as a possible threshold of the elastic benefit of shoe stiffness. 19 subjects participated in a running test while wearing insoles with five different bending stiffness levels. Joint angles, GRFs, and metabolic costs were measured and analyzed as functions of the shoe stiffness. No significant changes were found in the take-off velocity of the center of mass (CoM), but the horizontal ground push-offs were significantly reduced at different shoe stiffness levels, indicating that complementary changes in the lower-limb joint torques were introduced to maintain steady running. Slight increases in the ankle, knee, and hip joint angular impulses were observed at stiffness levels exceeding the critical stiffness, whereas the angular impulse at the MTPJ was significantly reduced. These results indicate that the shoe bending stiffness is beneficial to running energetics if it does not disturb the natural MTPJ flexion.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Angular impulse; Elastic insole; Metabolic cost; Running; Shoe bending stiffness

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28168959     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

Review 1.  Energetics and Biomechanics of Running Footwear with Increased Longitudinal Bending Stiffness: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Justin A Ortega; Laura A Healey; Wannes Swinnen; Wouter Hoogkamer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Does an increase in energy return and/or longitudinal bending stiffness shoe features reduce the energetic cost of running?

Authors:  Nicolas Flores; Nicolas Delattre; Eric Berton; Guillaume Rao
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Systematic Review of the Role of Footwear Constructions in Running Biomechanics: Implications for Running-Related Injury and Performance.

Authors:  Xiaole Sun; Wing-Kai Lam; Xini Zhang; Junqing Wang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Influence of the windlass mechanism on arch-spring mechanics during dynamic foot arch deformation.

Authors:  Lauren Welte; Luke A Kelly; Glen A Lichtwark; Michael J Rainbow
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Individual physiological responses to changes in shoe bending stiffness: a cluster analysis study on 96 runners.

Authors:  Mickael Chollet; Samuel Michelet; Nicolas Horvais; Sebastien Pavailler; Marlene Giandolini
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Effect of the Innovative Running Shoes With the Special Midsole Structure on the Female Runners' Lower Limb Biomechanics.

Authors:  Fengqin Fu; Lianming Guo; Xunfei Tang; Jiayu Wang; Zhihao Xie; Gusztáv Fekete; Yuhui Cai; Qiuli Hu; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-06

7.  Changes in ankle work, foot work, and tibialis anterior activation throughout a long run.

Authors:  Eric C Honert; Florian Ostermair; Vinzenz von Tscharner; Benno M Nigg
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 13.077

8.  A Comparison of the Energetic Cost of Running in Marathon Racing Shoes.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Shalaya Kipp; Jesse H Frank; Emily M Farina; Geng Luo; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Effect of the upward curvature of toe springs on walking biomechanics in humans.

Authors:  Freddy Sichting; Nicholas B Holowka; Oliver B Hansen; Daniel E Lieberman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effect of toe joint stiffness and toe shape on walking biomechanics.

Authors:  Eric C Honert; Gerasimos Bastas; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.