Literature DB >> 28168103

In situ morphometric survey elucidates the evolutionary systematics of the Eurasian Himantoglossum clade (Orchidaceae: Orchidinae).

Richard M Bateman1, Attila Molnár V2, Gábor Sramkó3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The charismatic Himantoglossum s.l. clade of Eurasian orchids contains an unusually large proportion of taxa that are of controversial circumscriptions and considerable conservation concern. Whereas our previously published study addressed the molecular phylogenetics and phylogeography of every named taxon within the clade, here we use detailed morphometric data obtained from the same populations to compare genotypes with associated phenotypes, in order to better explore taxonomic circumscription and character evolution within the clade.
METHODS: Between one and 12 plants found in 25 populations that encompassed the entire distribution of the Himantoglossum s.l. clade were measured in situ for 51 morphological characters. Results for 45 of those characters were subjected to detailed multivariate and univariate analyses. KEY
RESULTS: Multivariate analyses readily separate subgenus Barlia and subgenus Comperia from subgenus Himantoglossum, and also the early-divergent H. formosum from the less divergent remainder of subgenus Himantoglossum. The sequence of divergence of these four lineages is confidently resolved. Our experimental approach to morphometric character analysis demonstrates clearly that phenotypic evolution within Himantoglossum is unusually multi-dimensional.
CONCLUSIONS: Degrees of divergence between taxa shown by morphological analyses approximate those previously shown using molecular analyses. Himantoglossum s.l. is readily divisible into three subgenera. The three sections of subgenus Himantoglossum-hircinum, caprinum and formosum-are arrayed from west to east with only limited geographical overlap. At this taxonomic level, their juxtaposition combines with conflict between contrasting datasets to complicate attempts to distinguish between clinal variation and the discontinuities that by definition separate bona fide species. All taxa achieve allogamy via food deceit and have only weak pollinator specificity. Artificial crossing demonstrates that intrinsic sterility barriers are weak. Although we have found evidence of gene flow among and within the three sections of subgenus Himantoglossum, reports of natural hybrids are surprisingly rare, probably because putative parents are sufficiently similar to questionably warrant the status of species. Phenological separation and increased xeromorphy characterise the origin of subgenus Barlia. Several individual morphological characters show evidence of parallel acquisition, and loss of features is especially frequent in floral markings among members of section caprinum. Detailed patterns of gain and loss demonstrate that several different categories of flower markings are inherited independently. Along with the dimensions of labellar lobes, these pigmentation characters have been over-emphasised in previous taxonomic treatments. Increased plant vigour was a crucial element of the origin of the genus, but vegetative characters underwent remarkably little subsequent evolution. Attempts to reconstruct hypothetical ancestors at internal nodes of the phylogeny are weakened by (a) uncertain placement of Steveniella as sister to Himantoglossum s.l. and (b) uncertain relationships among subtly different putative species within section caprinum. Nonetheless, heterochronic/allometric trends, ultimately limited by functional constraints, clearly dictate transitions between contrasting flower sizes and complex labellum shapes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barlia; Comperia; Disparity; Functional constraints; Heterochrony; Himantoglossum; Hybridisation; Migration; Molecular phylogeny; Morphometrics; Orchid; Parallelism; Speciation; Systematics

Year:  2017        PMID: 28168103      PMCID: PMC5289109          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  23 in total

1.  Phylogenetics of tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae) based on combined DNA matrices: inferences regarding timing of diversification and evolution of pollination syndromes.

Authors:  Luis A Inda; Manuel Pimentel; Mark W Chase
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The relationship between cell division and elongation during development of the nectar-yielding petal spur in Centranthus ruber (Valerianaceae).

Authors:  Jaimie-Lee K Mack; Arthur R Davis
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception?

Authors:  Salvatore Cozzolino; Alex Widmer
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Patterns of reproductive isolation in Mediterranean deceptive orchids.

Authors:  Giovanni Scopece; Aldo Musacchio; Alex Widmer; Salvatore Cozzolino
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Systematic revision of Platanthera in the Azorean archipelago: not one but three species, including arguably Europe's rarest orchid.

Authors:  Richard M Bateman; Paula J Rudall; Mónica Moura
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  What is parallelism?

Authors:  Robert W Scotland
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Minority cytotypes in European populations of the Gymnadenia conopsea complex (Orchidaceae) greatly increase intraspecific and intrapopulation diversity.

Authors:  Pavel Trávnícek; Jana Jersáková; Barbora Kubátová; Jana Krejcíková; Richard M Bateman; Magdalena Lucanová; Eva Krajníková; Tamara Tesitelová; Zuzana Stípková; Jean-Pierre Amardeilh; Emilia Brzosko; Edyta Jermakowicz; Olivier Cabanne; Walter Durka; Peter Efimov; Mikael Hedrén; Carlos E Hermosilla; Karel Kreutz; Tiiu Kull; Kadri Tali; Olivier Marchand; Manel Rey; Florian P Schiestl; Vladislav Curn; Jan Suda
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 8.  Pollinator-mediated selfing in two deceptive orchids and a review of pollinium tracking studies addressing geitonogamy.

Authors:  Matthias Kropf; Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Genome size diversity in orchids: consequences and evolution.

Authors:  I J Leitch; I Kahandawala; J Suda; L Hanson; M J Ingrouille; M W Chase; M F Fay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Organ homologies in orchid flowers re-interpreted using the Musk Orchid as a model.

Authors:  Paula J Rudall; Craig D Perl; Richard M Bateman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  3 in total

1.  zzm321990 Himantoglossum adriaticum H. Baumann × Himantoglossum robertianum (Loisel.) P. Delforge: A New Interspecific Hybrid Assessed by Barcoding Analysis.

Authors:  Maurizio Antonetti; Stefania Nin; Gianluca Burchi; Stefano Biricolti; Massimo Gori
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-06

2.  Comparative chromosome studies in species of subtribe Orchidinae (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Alessio Turco; Antonella Albano; Pietro Medagli; Robert P Wagensommer; Saverio D'Emerico
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 1.800

3.  Orchids of Azerbaijani Cemeteries.

Authors:  Attila Molnár V; Viktor Löki; Marc Verbeeck; Kristóf Süveges
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.