Literature DB >> 25725007

The relationship between cell division and elongation during development of the nectar-yielding petal spur in Centranthus ruber (Valerianaceae).

Jaimie-Lee K Mack1, Arthur R Davis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Floral spurs are hollow, tubular outgrowths that typically conceal nectar. By their involvement in specialized pollinator interactions, spurs have ecological and evolutionary significance, often leading to speciation. Despite their importance and diversity in shape and size among angiosperm taxa, detailed investigations of the mechanism of spur development have been conducted only recently.
METHODS: Initiation and growth of the nectar-yielding petal spur of Centranthus ruber 'Snowcloud' was investigated throughout seven stages, based on bud size and developmental events. The determination of the frequency of cell division, quantified for the first time in spurs, was conducted by confocal microscopy following 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining of mitotic figures. Moreover, using scanning electron microscospy of the outer petal spur surface unobstructed by trichomes, morphometry of epidermal cells was determined throughout development in order to understand the ontogeny of this elongate, hollow tube. KEY
RESULTS: Spur growth from the corolla base initially included diffuse cell divisions identified among epidermal cells as the spur progressed through its early stages. However, cell divisions clearly diminished before a petal spur attained 30 % of its final length of 4·5 mm. Thereafter until anthesis, elongation of individual cells was primarily responsible for the spur's own extension. Consequently, a prolonged period of anisotropy, wherein epidermal cells elongated almost uniformly in all regions along the petal spur's longitudinal axis, contributed principally to the spur's mature length.
CONCLUSIONS: This research demonstrates that anisotropic growth of epidermal cells - in the same orientation as spur elongation - chiefly explains petal spur extension in C. ruber. Representing the inaugural investigation of the cellular basis for spur ontogeny within the Euasterids II clade, this study complements the patterns in Aquilegia species (order Ranunculales, Eudicots) and Linaria vulgaris (order Lamiales, Euasterids I), thereby suggesting the existence of a common underlying mechanism for petal spur ontogeny in disparate dicot lineages.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anisotropy; Centranthus ruber; Dipsacales; Valerianaceae; cell division; cell elongation; development; growth; meristem; nectar; petal; spur

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25725007      PMCID: PMC4343294          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcu261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  13 in total

1.  Plant organ size control: AINTEGUMENTA regulates growth and cell numbers during organogenesis.

Authors:  Y Mizukami; R L Fischer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Growth dynamics underlying petal shape and asymmetry.

Authors:  Anne-Gaëlle Rolland-Lagan; J Andrew Bangham; Enrico Coen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception?

Authors:  Salvatore Cozzolino; Alex Widmer
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Selection on spur shape in Impatiens capensis.

Authors:  Helen J Young
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Are spurred cyathia a key innovation? Molecular systematics and trait evolution in the slipper spurges (Pedilanthus clade: Euphorbia, Euphorbiaceae).

Authors:  N Ivalú Cacho; Paul E Berry; Mark E Olson; Victor W Steinmann; David A Baum
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Key innovations and the ecology of macroevolution.

Authors:  J P Hunter
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Imaging and modeling growth and morphogenesis in plants.

Authors:  Pradeep Das
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 5.578

8.  Is nectar reabsorption restricted by the stalk cells of floral and extrafloral nectary trichomes?

Authors:  P Cardoso-Gustavson; A R Davis
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.081

9.  Evolution of spur-length diversity in Aquilegia petals is achieved solely through cell-shape anisotropy.

Authors:  Joshua R Puzey; Sharon J Gerbode; Scott A Hodges; Elena M Kramer; L Mahadevan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Flower-specific KNOX phenotype in the orchid Dactylorhiza fuchsii.

Authors:  Mathew S Box; Steven Dodsworth; Paula J Rudall; Richard M Bateman; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  6 in total

1.  Contrasting lengths of Pelargonium floral nectar tubes result from late differences in rate and duration of growth.

Authors:  Timothy Tsai; Pamela K Diggle; Henry A Frye; Cynthia S Jones
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  In situ morphometric survey elucidates the evolutionary systematics of the Eurasian Himantoglossum clade (Orchidaceae: Orchidinae).

Authors:  Richard M Bateman; Attila Molnár V; Gábor Sramkó
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Nectar-Secreting and Nectarless Epidendrum: Structure of the Inner Floral Spur.

Authors:  Małgorzata Stpiczyńska; Magdalena Kamińska; Kevin L Davies; Emerson R Pansarin
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Delayed differentiation of epidermal cells walls can underlie pedomorphosis in plants: the case of pedomorphic petals in the hummingbird-pollinated Caiophora hibiscifolia (Loasaceae, subfam. Loasoideae) species.

Authors:  Marina M Strelin; Eduardo E Zattara; Kristian Ullrich; Mareike Schallenberg-Rüdinger; Stefan Rensing
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.250

5.  The Phenotypic and Genetic Underpinnings of Flower Size in Polemoniaceae.

Authors:  Jacob B Landis; Rebecca D O'Toole; Kayla L Ventura; Matthew A Gitzendanner; David G Oppenheimer; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Evolution of nectar spur length in a clade of Linaria reflects changes in cell division rather than in cell expansion.

Authors:  E Cullen; M Fernández-Mazuecos; B J Glover
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.