| Literature DB >> 28168022 |
Emma J Sayer1, Anna E Oliver2, Jason D Fridley3, Andrew P Askew3, Robert T E Mills4, J Philip Grime5.
Abstract
Climate change can influence soil microorganisms directly by altering their growth and activity but also indirectly via effects on the vegetation, which modifies the availability of resources. Direct impacts of climate change on soil microorganisms can occur rapidly, whereas indirect effects mediated by shifts in plant community composition are not immediately apparent and likely to increase over time. We used molecular fingerprinting of bacterial and fungal communities in the soil to investigate the effects of 17 years of temperature and rainfall manipulations in a species-rich grassland near Buxton, UK. We compared shifts in microbial community structure to changes in plant species composition and key plant traits across 78 microsites within plots subjected to winter heating, rainfall supplementation, or summer drought. We observed marked shifts in soil fungal and bacterial community structure in response to chronic summer drought. Importantly, although dominant microbial taxa were largely unaffected by drought, there were substantial changes in the abundances of subordinate fungal and bacterial taxa. In contrast to short-term studies that report high resistance of soil fungi to drought, we observed substantial losses of fungal taxa in the summer drought treatments. There was moderate concordance between soil microbial communities and plant species composition within microsites. Vector fitting of community-weighted mean plant traits to ordinations of soil bacterial and fungal communities showed that shifts in soil microbial community structure were related to plant traits representing the quality of resources available to soil microorganisms: the construction cost of leaf material, foliar carbon-to-nitrogen ratios, and leaf dry matter content. Thus, our study provides evidence that climate change could affect soil microbial communities indirectly via changes in plant inputs and highlights the importance of considering long-term climate change effects, especially in nutrient-poor systems with slow-growing vegetation.Entities:
Keywords: Buxton; drought; grassland; resilience; resistance; soil bacteria; soil fungi; subordinate taxa
Year: 2017 PMID: 28168022 PMCID: PMC5288249 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2700
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1NMDS representation of (a) soil fungal communities, (b) soil bacterial communities, (c) subordinate fungal taxa, and (d) subordinate bacterial taxa in grassland plots subjected to long‐term climate treatments; ordinations were based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities and hulls envelope all plots within a treatment, where “C” is control, “H” is heated, “D” is drought, and “W” is watered; significant correlations (p < .05) between ordination axes and treatments or community‐weighted plant traits are shown as arrows, where “Ccost” is the construction cost of plant material
Figure 2Residuals of Procrustes rotations (unitless) showing the associations between NMDS solutions of plant species composition and (a) soil fungal communities or (b) soil bacterial communities for each microsite within the Buxton climate treatments, where pale shaded bars denote shallow microsites and solid bars denote deep microsites; median (dashed line) and upper and lower quartiles (dotted lines) are shown; large residuals indicate individual microsites with a weak concordance between plant and microbial communities
Figure 3NMDS representation of (a) the soil fungal community, (b) the soil bacterial community, (c) subordinate fungal taxa, and (d) subordinate bacterial taxa in microsites within the Buxton climate treatments; ordinations were based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities and significant correlations of community‐weighted plant functional traits and environmental variables with ordination axes are shown as arrows, where “Msite” is a microsite score based on multiple measurements of soil depth and pH, “Ccost” is the construction cost of plant material, “C:N” is the carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio of plant material, and “LDMC” is leaf dry matter content