| Literature DB >> 28168009 |
Renuka Chaphalkar1, Kishori G Apte2, Yogesh Talekar2, Shreesh Kumar Ojha3, Mukesh Nandave1.
Abstract
Phyllanthus emblica L. (amla) has been used in Ayurveda as a potent rasayan for treatment of hepatic disorders. Most of the pharmacological studies, however, are largely focused on PE fruit, while the rest of the parts of PE, particularly, bark, remain underinvestigated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the protective effect of the hydroalcoholic extract of Phyllanthus emblica bark (PEE) in ethanol-induced hepatotoxicity model in rats. Total phenolic, flavonoid, and tannin content and in vitro antioxidant activities were determined by using H2O2 scavenging and ABTS decolorization assays. Our results showed that PEE was rich in total phenols (99.523 ± 1.91 mg GAE/g), total flavonoids (389.33 ± 1.25 mg quercetin hydrate/g), and total tannins (310 ± 0.21 mg catechin/g), which clearly support its strong antioxidant potential. HPTLC-based quantitative analysis revealed the presence of the potent antioxidants gallic acid (25.05 mg/g) and ellagic acid (13.31 mg/g). Moreover, one-month PEE treatment (500 and 1000 mg/kg, p.o.) followed by 30-day 70% ethanol (10 mL/kg) administration showed hepatoprotection as evidenced by significant restoration of ALT (p < 0.01), AST (p < 0.001), ALP (p < 0.05), and TP (p < 0.001) and further confirmed by liver histopathology. PEE-mediated hepatoprotection could be due to its free radical scavenging and antioxidant activity that may be ascribed to its antioxidant components, namely, ellagic acid and gallic acid. Thus, the results of the present study support the therapeutic claims made in Ayurveda about Phyllanthus emblica.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28168009 PMCID: PMC5267079 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3876040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Qualitative analysis of phytochemicals present in PEE.
| Phytochemical analyzed | Test method | Inference |
|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrate | Molisch's test | − |
| Fehling's test | − | |
| Flavonoids | Alkaline reagent test |
|
| Ferric chloride test |
| |
| Tannins | Ferric chloride test |
|
| Potassium dichromate test |
| |
| Glycosides | Keller-Kiliani's test |
|
| Saponins | Foam test |
|
| Alkaloids | Mayer's test |
|
| Dragendorff's test |
| |
| Sterols and triterpenoids | Salkowski test | − |
| Amino acids | Ninhydrin test | − |
(+++): appreciable amount; (++) moderate amount; (+) trace amount; (−) completely absent.
The total phenolic, flavonoids, and tannin contents present in PEE.
| Parameters | Hydroalcoholic extract of PE bark |
|---|---|
| Total phenolic content | 99.523 ± 1.91 |
| Total flavonoid content | 389.33 ± 1.25 |
| Total tannin content | 310 ± 0.21 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of three replicates.
H2O2 radical scavenging activity of PEE (n = 6).
| Concentration [ | % scavenging activity of ascorbic acid | % scavenging activity of PEE |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 6.82 ± 1.106 | 7.85 ± 2.427 |
| 50 | 14.63 ± 0.571 | 14.02 ± 5.603 |
| 100 | 28.80 ± 0.7495 | 23.91 ± 2.998 |
| 150 | 40.82 ± 1.999 | 32.01 ± 2.248 |
| 200 | 55.39 ± 0.2855 | 43.20 ± 3.301 |
| 250 | 71.34 ± 0.2498 | 79.62 ± 2.541 |
Values are expressed as a mean ± SEM.
ABTS radical scavenging activity of PEE (n = 6).
| Concentration | % inhibition | Concentration equivalent to ascorbic acid [ |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | 21.79 ± 0.011 | 34.0 |
| 100 | 27.52 ± 0.001 | 55.0 |
| 150 | 31.74 ± 0.011 | 70.5 |
| 200 | 36.23 ± 0.007 | 87 |
| 250 | 42.91 ± 0.002 | 111.5 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Effect of PEE on ALT, AST, ALP, and TP in ethanol-induced liver damage in rats.
| Study groups | Treatment | ALT | AST | ALP | TP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | Saline (1 mL/kg/day) | 49.49 ± 4.647 | 155.4 ± 6.197 | 270.71 ± 48.66 | 5.2 ± 0.31 |
| Disease control | 70% ethanol (10 mL/kg/day) | 103.9 ± 16.33### | 301.8 ± 17.91### | 396.4 ± 17.07# | 3.017 ± 0.31### |
| SIL25 | Silymarin (25 mg/kg/day) | 56.20 ± 1.953 | 230.5 ± 21.65 | 278.6 ± 4.351 | 4.9 ± 0.50 |
| PEE500 | PEE (500 mg/kg/day) | 61.20 ± 4.693 | 189.8 ± 8.84 | 267.1 ± 14.15 | 5.283 ± 0.25 |
| PEE1000 | PEE (1000 mg/kg/day) | 69.03 ± 3.66 | 210.8 ± 17.82 | 360.9 ± 44.92 | 5.133 ± 0.35 |
ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, and TP: total protein. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM of at least 6 animals from each experimental group. Data found significant when One Way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test performed. p < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Statistical significance (#p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01; ###p < 0.001) compared with the normal control group and (p < 0.05; p < 0.01; p < 0.001) compared with the disease control group.
Figure 1Photomicrographs of liver sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin. (a and b) Ethanol treated rat liver, (c) PEE500 mg/kg + ethanol treated, (d) PEE1000 mg/kg + ethanol treated, and (e) silymarin 25 mg/kg + ethanol treated (200x) [SV: degenerated hepatocytes with cellular swelling and vacuolar changes in cytoplasm; NF: necrotic foci with loss of nucleus of hepatocytes].
Effect of PEE on histopathological activity index in ethanol-induced liver damage in rats.
| Study groups | Sinusoidal congestion in hepatic parenchyma | Degenerative changes | Necrotic changes of hepatic parenchyma, loss of nucleus, fragmentation of nuclei, centrilobular, midzonal necrosis | Bile duct hyperplasia | Perivascular lymphoid aggregation | Infiltration of mononuclear cells (MNC), formation of microgranuloma | Fatty liver (lipid deposition in hepatocyte), steatosis | Overall pathological grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | +/focal | NAD | NAD | NAD | +/focal | NAD | +/focal | NAD |
| Disease control | ++ | + ++ | ++ | + | + | NAD | ++ | +++ |
| SIL25 | NAD | +/focal | NAD | NAD | NAD | NAD | NAD | + |
| PEE500 | NAD | +/focal | +/focal | + | NAD | +/focal | NAD | ++ |
| PEE1000 | NAD | + | + | +/focal | NAD | NAD | NAD | + |
n = 4 per experimental group. No abnormality detected (NAD), minimal pathological changes (+), mild pathological changes (++), moderate pathological changes (+++), and severe pathological changes (++++). Focal and minimal changes may not be significant for alteration of functional capacity of the organ.