BACKGROUND: In the treatment of pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI), timely treatment of patients can affect the outcome. Our objectives were to examine the treatment process of acute pediatric TBI and the impact of non-value-added time (NVAT) on patient outcomes. METHODS: Data for 136 pediatric trauma patients (age < 18 years) with severe TBI from 2 trauma centers in the United States were collected. A process flow and value stream map identified NVATs and their sources in the treatment process. Cluster and regression analysis were used to examine the relationship between NVAT, as a percentage of the patient's length of stay (LOS), and the patient outcome, measured by their corresponding Glasgow outcome scale. RESULTS: There were 14 distinct sources of NVAT identified. A regression analysis showed that increased NVAT was associated with less favorable outcomes (relative ratio = 1.015, confidence interval = [1.002-1.029]). Specifically, 1% increase in the NVAT-to-LOS ratio was associated with a 1.5% increase in the chance of a less favorable outcome (i.e., death or vegetative state). CONCLUSION: The NVAT has a significant impact on the outcome of pediatric TBI, and every minute spent on performing non-value-added processes can lead to an increase in the likelihood of less favorable outcomes.
BACKGROUND: In the treatment of pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI), timely treatment of patients can affect the outcome. Our objectives were to examine the treatment process of acute pediatric TBI and the impact of non-value-added time (NVAT) on patient outcomes. METHODS: Data for 136 pediatric traumapatients (age < 18 years) with severe TBI from 2 trauma centers in the United States were collected. A process flow and value stream map identified NVATs and their sources in the treatment process. Cluster and regression analysis were used to examine the relationship between NVAT, as a percentage of the patient's length of stay (LOS), and the patient outcome, measured by their corresponding Glasgow outcome scale. RESULTS: There were 14 distinct sources of NVAT identified. A regression analysis showed that increased NVAT was associated with less favorable outcomes (relative ratio = 1.015, confidence interval = [1.002-1.029]). Specifically, 1% increase in the NVAT-to-LOS ratio was associated with a 1.5% increase in the chance of a less favorable outcome (i.e., death or vegetative state). CONCLUSION: The NVAT has a significant impact on the outcome of pediatric TBI, and every minute spent on performing non-value-added processes can lead to an increase in the likelihood of less favorable outcomes.
Authors: Joseph J Tepas; Cynthia L Leaphart; Pam Pieper; Cynthia L Beaulieu; Louise R Spierre; James D Tuten; Brian G Celso Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Marion Smits; Diederik W J Dippel; Gijs G de Haan; Heleen M Dekker; Pieter E Vos; Digna R Kool; Paul J Nederkoorn; Paul A M Hofman; Albert Twijnstra; Hervé L J Tanghe; M G Myriam Hunink Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-09-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: P David Adelson; Susan L Bratton; Nancy A Carney; Randall M Chesnut; Hugo E M du Coudray; Brahm Goldstein; Patrick M Kochanek; Helen C Miller; Michael D Partington; Nathan R Selden; Craig W Warden; David W Wright Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Monica S Vavilala; Mary A Kernic; Jin Wang; Nithya Kannan; Richard B Mink; Mark S Wainwright; Jonathan I Groner; Michael J Bell; Christopher C Giza; Douglas F Zatzick; Richard G Ellenbogen; Linda Ng Boyle; Pamela H Mitchell; Frederick P Rivara Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: E Rand Sutherland; Elena Goleva; Tonya S King; Erik Lehman; Allen D Stevens; Leisa P Jackson; Amanda R Stream; John V Fahy; Donald Y M Leung Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ali Ajdari; Linda Ng Boyle; Nithya Kannan; Jin Wang; Frederick P Rivara; Monica S Vavilala Journal: J Healthc Qual Date: 2018 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 1.095
Authors: Nithya Kannan; Alex Quistberg; Jin Wang; Jonathan I Groner; Richard B Mink; Mark S Wainwright; Michael J Bell; Christopher C Giza; Douglas F Zatzick; Richard G Ellenbogen; Linda Ng Boyle; Pamela H Mitchell; Monica S Vavilala Journal: Brain Inj Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Monica S Vavilala; Mary A King; Jen-Ting Yang; Scott L Erickson; Brianna Mills; Rosemary M Grant; Carolyn Blayney; Qian Qiu; Randall M Chesnut; Kenneth M Jaffe; Bryan J Weiner; Brian D Johnston Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2018-11-23
Authors: Juan A Marin-Garcia; Pilar I Vidal-Carreras; Julio J Garcia-Sabater Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Shyam J Deshpande; Julia Velonjara; Silvia Lujan; Gustavo Petroni; Jin Wang; Kushang V Patel; Linda Ng Boyle; Michael J Bell; Monica S Vavilala Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 3.752