BACKGROUND: "Lean" is a set of principles and techniques that drive organizations to continually add value to the product they deliver by enhancing process steps that are necessary, relevant, and valuable while eliminating those that fail to add value. Lean has been used in manufacturing for decades and has been associated with enhanced product quality and overall corporate success. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the adoption of Lean principles by an Emergency Department (ED) improves the value of emergency care delivered. METHODS: Beginning in December 2005, we implemented a variety of Lean techniques in an effort to enhance patient and staff satisfaction. The implementation followed a six-step process of Lean education, ED observation, patient flow analysis, process redesign, new process testing, and full implementation. Process redesign focused on generating improvement ideas from frontline workers across all departmental units. Value-based and operational outcome measures, including patient satisfaction, expense per patient, ED length of stay (LOS), and patient volume were compared for calendar year 2005 (pre-Lean) and periodically after 2006 (post-Lean). RESULTS: Patient visits increased by 9.23% in 2006. Despite this increase, LOS decreased slightly and patient satisfaction increased significantly without raising the inflation adjusted cost per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Lean improved the value of the care we delivered to our patients. Generating and instituting ideas from our frontline providers have been the key to the success of our Lean program. Although Lean represents a fundamental change in the way we think of delivering care, the specific process changes we employed tended to be simple, small procedure modifications specific to our unique people, process, and place. We, therefore, believe that institutions or departments aspiring to adopt Lean should focus on the core principles of Lean rather than on emulating specific process changes made at other institutions.
BACKGROUND: "Lean" is a set of principles and techniques that drive organizations to continually add value to the product they deliver by enhancing process steps that are necessary, relevant, and valuable while eliminating those that fail to add value. Lean has been used in manufacturing for decades and has been associated with enhanced product quality and overall corporate success. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the adoption of Lean principles by an Emergency Department (ED) improves the value of emergency care delivered. METHODS: Beginning in December 2005, we implemented a variety of Lean techniques in an effort to enhance patient and staff satisfaction. The implementation followed a six-step process of Lean education, ED observation, patient flow analysis, process redesign, new process testing, and full implementation. Process redesign focused on generating improvement ideas from frontline workers across all departmental units. Value-based and operational outcome measures, including patient satisfaction, expense per patient, ED length of stay (LOS), and patient volume were compared for calendar year 2005 (pre-Lean) and periodically after 2006 (post-Lean). RESULTS:Patient visits increased by 9.23% in 2006. Despite this increase, LOS decreased slightly and patient satisfaction increased significantly without raising the inflation adjusted cost per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Lean improved the value of the care we delivered to our patients. Generating and instituting ideas from our frontline providers have been the key to the success of our Lean program. Although Lean represents a fundamental change in the way we think of delivering care, the specific process changes we employed tended to be simple, small procedure modifications specific to our unique people, process, and place. We, therefore, believe that institutions or departments aspiring to adopt Lean should focus on the core principles of Lean rather than on emulating specific process changes made at other institutions.
Authors: Patrick M Carter; Jeffery S Desmond; Christopher Akanbobnaab; Rockefeller A Oteng; Sarah D Rominski; William G Barsan; Rebecca M Cunningham Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Benjamin A White; Jason M Baron; Anand S Dighe; Carlos A Camargo; David F M Brown Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2015-06-14 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Ali Ajdari; Linda Ng Boyle; Nithya Kannan; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar; Jin Wang; Richard Mink; Benjamin Ries; Mark Wainwright; Jonathan I Groner; Michael J Bell; Chris Giza; Douglas F Zatzick; Richard G Ellenbogen; Pamela H Mitchell; Frederick P Rivara; Monica S Vavilala Journal: J Healthc Qual Date: 2017 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 1.095
Authors: Paula A Newman-Casey; John A Musser; Leslie M Niziol; Michele M Heisler; Shivani S Kamat; Manjool M Shah; Nish Patel; Amy M Cohn Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Aline Lima Pestana Magalhães; Alacoque Lorenzini Erdmann; Elza Lima da Silva; José Luís Guedes Dos Santos Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2016-08-08