Literature DB >> 28165646

Simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography for measuring carotid stenosis.

Hongge Shu1,2, Jie Sun2, Thomas S Hatsukami3, Niranjan Balu2, Daniel S Hippe2, Haining Liu4, Ted R Kohler3,5, Wenzhen Zhu1, Chun Yuan2,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate in a proof-of-concept study the feasibility of Simultaneous Noncontrast Angiography and intraPlaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging as a clinical magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) technique for measuring carotid stenosis. There is a growing interest in detecting intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) during the clinical management of carotid disease, yet luminal stenosis has remained indispensable during clinical decision-making. SNAP imaging has been proposed as a novel IPH imaging technique that provides carotid MRA with no added scan time. Flowing blood shows negative signal on SNAP because of phase-sensitive inversion recovery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 58 asymptomatic subjects with 16-79% stenosis on ultrasound were scanned at 3T by SNAP with 0.8 mm isotropic resolution and 16 cm longitudinal coverage. Two readers measured luminal stenosis of bilateral carotid arteries (n = 116) on minimum intensity projections of SNAP using the NASCET criteria. In the subset (48 arteries) with contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA available for comparison, luminal stenosis was also measured on maximum intensity projections of CE-MRA.
RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals were 0.94 (0.90-0.96) and 0.93 (0.88-0.96) for intra- and interreader agreement on stenosis measurements, respectively. Corresponding kappas for grading stenosis (0-29%, 30-69%, 70-99%, and 100%) were 0.79 (0.67-0.89) and 0.80 (0.68-0.90). Agreement between SNAP and CE-MRA was high (ICC: 0.95 [0.90-0.98]; kappa: 0.82 [0.71-0.93]).
CONCLUSION: As a dedicated IPH-imaging sequence, SNAP also provided carotid stenosis measurement that showed high intra- and interreader consistency and excellent agreement with CE-MRA. Further comparisons with digital subtraction angiography and other noninvasive techniques are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1045-1052.
© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASCET; carotid disease; intraplaque hemorrhage; magnetic resonance angiography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28165646      PMCID: PMC5545168          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  25 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Luca Remonda; Pascal Senn; Alain Barth; Marcel Arnold; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J M Wardlaw; F M Chappell; J J K Best; K Wartolowska; E Berry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  An optimized 3D inversion recovery prepared fast spoiled gradient recalled sequence for carotid plaque hemorrhage imaging at 3.0 T.

Authors:  David C Zhu; Marina S Ferguson; J Kevin DeMarco
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  Meta-analysis and systematic review of the predictive value of carotid plaque hemorrhage on cerebrovascular events by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tobias Saam; Holger Hetterich; Verena Hoffmann; Chun Yuan; Martin Dichgans; Holger Poppert; Thomas Koeppel; Ulrich Hoffmann; Maximilian F Reiser; Fabian Bamberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Presence of intraplaque hemorrhage stimulates progression of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Norihide Takaya; Chun Yuan; Baocheng Chu; Tobias Saam; Nayak L Polissar; Gail P Jarvik; Carol Isaac; Judith McDonough; Cynthia Natiello; Randy Small; Marina S Ferguson; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Assessment of carotid artery atherosclerotic disease by using three-dimensional fast black-blood MR imaging: comparison with DSA.

Authors:  Huilin Zhao; Jinnan Wang; Xiaosheng Liu; Xihai Zhao; Daniel S Hippe; Ye Cao; Jieqing Wan; Chun Yuan; Jianrong Xu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.

Authors:  H J Barnett; D W Taylor; M Eliasziw; A J Fox; G G Ferguson; R B Haynes; R N Rankin; G P Clagett; V C Hachinski; D L Sackett; K E Thorpe; H E Meldrum; J D Spence
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah M Debrey; Hua Yu; John K Lynch; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Violet L Wright; Sok-Ja D Janket; Alison E Baird
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Blood Pressure Is a Major Modifiable Risk Factor Implicated in Pathogenesis of Intraplaque Hemorrhage: An In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Gador Canton; Niranjan Balu; Daniel S Hippe; Dongxiang Xu; Jin Liu; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 8.311

10.  Magnetic resonance angiography detection of abnormal carotid artery plaque in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Authors:  Ajay Gupta; Gino Gialdini; Michael P Lerario; Hediyeh Baradaran; Ashley Giambrone; Babak B Navi; Randolph S Marshall; Costantino Iadecola; Hooman Kamel
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  4 in total

1.  Semiautomatic carotid intraplaque hemorrhage volume measurement using 3D carotid MRI.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Jie Sun; Niranjan Balu; Marina S Ferguson; Jinnan Wang; William S Kerwin; Daniel S Hippe; Amy Wang; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic plaque surface characteristics utilizing simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) technique.

Authors:  Shuo Chen; Huilin Zhao; Jifan Li; Zechen Zhou; Rui Li; Niranjan Balu; Chun Yuan; Huijun Chen; Xihai Zhao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Integrated head and neck imaging of symptomatic patients with stroke using simultaneous non-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging as compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Yuxi Jia; Xiaoming Liu; Lan Zhang; Xiangchuang Kong; Shuo Chen; Lei Zhang; Jiazheng Wang; Shenglei Shu; Jia Liu; Xiaona Fu; Dingxi Liu; Jing Wang; Heshui Shi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Vessel length on SNAP MRA and TOF MRA is a potential imaging biomarker for brain blood flow.

Authors:  Anders Gould; Zhensen Chen; Duygu Baylam Geleri; Niranjan Balu; Zechen Zhou; Li Chen; Baocheng Chu; Kristi Pimentel; Gador Canton; Thomas Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.130

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.