Shuo Chen1, Huilin Zhao2, Jifan Li1, Zechen Zhou3, Rui Li1, Niranjan Balu4, Chun Yuan1,4, Huijun Chen1, Xihai Zhao1. 1. Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Beijing, P.R. China. 2. Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China. 3. Healthcare Department, Philips Research China, Shanghai, P.R. China. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of the Simultaneous Noncontrast Angiography and intraPlaque hemorrhage (SNAP) technique in identification of carotid plaque surface characteristics compared with the conventional multicontrast vessel wall imaging protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty symptomatic patients with carotid plaque were recruited and underwent carotid artery magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (3.0T) using a conventional multicontrast protocol and SNAP sequence. As an intrinsic multicontrast sequence, SNAP could generate a gray blood reference (Ref) image set, a black blood corrected real (CR) image set, and a bright blood MR angiography (MRA) image set. A bright blood SNAP Ref2 image was implemented by combining Ref and MRA images for facilitating plaque surface characteristics evaluation. The presence/absence of calcification (CA), juxtaluminal calcification (JCA), and ulceration was assessed. The agreement between SNAP and multicontrast vessel wall protocol in identifying CA, JCA, and ulceration was analyzed using Cohen's kappa analysis. The interreader and intrareader reproducibility of SNAP imaging in identifying plaque surface characteristics was also assessed. RESULTS: Good to excellent agreement was found between SNAP and conventional multicontrast protocol in identifying CA (κ = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.93), JCA (κ = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.97), and ulceration (κ = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.65-0.99). In addition, excellent intrareader and interreader reproducibility was found for SNAP imaging in identification of CA, JCA, and ulceration. CONCLUSION: SNAP imaging showed excellent agreement with multicontrast imaging and high reproducibility in identification of both JCA and ulceration, suggesting that SNAP imaging may be a time-efficient, alternative tool in identification of plaque surface characteristics in carotid arteries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:634-639.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of the Simultaneous Noncontrast Angiography and intraPlaque hemorrhage (SNAP) technique in identification of carotid plaque surface characteristics compared with the conventional multicontrast vessel wall imaging protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty symptomatic patients with carotid plaque were recruited and underwent carotid artery magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (3.0T) using a conventional multicontrast protocol and SNAP sequence. As an intrinsic multicontrast sequence, SNAP could generate a gray blood reference (Ref) image set, a black blood corrected real (CR) image set, and a bright blood MR angiography (MRA) image set. A bright blood SNAP Ref2 image was implemented by combining Ref and MRA images for facilitating plaque surface characteristics evaluation. The presence/absence of calcification (CA), juxtaluminal calcification (JCA), and ulceration was assessed. The agreement between SNAP and multicontrast vessel wall protocol in identifying CA, JCA, and ulceration was analyzed using Cohen's kappa analysis. The interreader and intrareader reproducibility of SNAP imaging in identifying plaque surface characteristics was also assessed. RESULTS: Good to excellent agreement was found between SNAP and conventional multicontrast protocol in identifying CA (κ = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.93), JCA (κ = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.97), and ulceration (κ = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.65-0.99). In addition, excellent intrareader and interreader reproducibility was found for SNAP imaging in identification of CA, JCA, and ulceration. CONCLUSION: SNAP imaging showed excellent agreement with multicontrast imaging and high reproducibility in identification of both JCA and ulceration, suggesting that SNAP imaging may be a time-efficient, alternative tool in identification of plaque surface characteristics in carotid arteries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:634-639.
Authors: Kiran R Nandalur; Erol Baskurt; Klaus D Hagspiel; C Douglas Phillips; Christopher M Kramer Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Jinnan Wang; Marina S Ferguson; Niranjan Balu; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami; Peter Börnert Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Chun Yuan; Shao-xiong Zhang; Nayak L Polissar; Denise Echelard; Geraldo Ortiz; Joseph W Davis; Elizabeth Ellington; Marina S Ferguson; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Wintermark; S S Jawadi; J H Rapp; T Tihan; E Tong; D V Glidden; S Abedin; S Schaeffer; G Acevedo-Bolton; B Boudignon; B Orwoll; X Pan; D Saloner Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Wael E Shaalan; Hongwei Cheng; Bruce Gewertz; James F McKinsey; Lewis B Schwartz; Daniel Katz; Dindcai Cao; Tina Desai; Seymour Glagov; Hisham S Bassiouny Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.268