| Literature DB >> 28165410 |
Ezequiel Hernández-Becerra1,2, Elsa Gutiérrez-Cortez3,4, Alicia Del Real5, Alejandra Rojas-Molina6, Mario Rodríguez-García7, Efraín Rubio8, Michelle Quintero-García9, Isela Rojas-Molina10.
Abstract
Mechanical, miEntities:
Keywords: Opuntia ficus indica; bone mineral density; cactus; calcium; maturity stage; microstructure; phosphorus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28165410 PMCID: PMC5331539 DOI: 10.3390/nu9020108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Ingredient composition of the experimental diets with Opuntia ficus indica as calcium source.
| Ingredientes | Control (g/kg) | N-60 a (g/kg) | N-200 a (g/kg) | N-400 a (g/kg) | N-600 a (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corn starch | 530 | 517 | 519 | 520 | 521 |
| Sucrose | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Casein b | 200 | 177 | 193 | 195.6 | 195 |
| Soybean oil | 70 | 63.9 | 66 | 68 | 67.5 |
| Fiber c | 50 | 30 | 36.8 | 37 | 38 |
| MixMin d | 49 | 34 | 42 | 44 | 43 |
| Mix Vit e | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| L-Cystein | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Choline bitartarate | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| CaCO3 f | 12.5 | - | - | - | - |
| - | 280 | 168 | 140 | 132 |
a Diets prepared with cladodes of 60 g (N-60), 200 g (N-200), 400 g (N-400) and 600 g (N-600) of weight; b Casein Sigma Chemical, Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA, C-7078; c α-Cell Fiber Solft Zolca MPbiomedical, Santa Ana, CA, USA. In diets prepared with O. ficus indica, the fiber content was fitted to 50 g/kg diet, taking into consideration the fiber content in cladodes; d Mineral mix without calcium (AIN-93-MX, Harlan Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA, TD 04374) [13]; e Vitamin mix (AIN-93-VX, Harlan Inc., TD 94047) [13]; f Control diet contained CaCO3 (Merck 2066, Darmstadt, Germany) as calcium source; g In experimental diets, O. ficus indica powder provided 5 g/kg of calcium, as well as the carbohydrates, proteins and lipids, that complemented nutritional requirements in experimental diets (AIN-93G) [13].
Chemical composition of control and experimental diets.
| Content (%) | Control | N-60 | N-200 | N-400 | N-600 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | 8.00 | 8.56 | 7.95 | 7.70 | 7.20 |
| Ash | 2.10 | 1.64 | 2.25 | 2.40 | 2.60 |
| Carbohydrates a | 63.90 | 63.20 | 63.40 | 63.50 | 62.70 |
| Protein a | 19.50 | 19.90 | 19.80 | 19.80 | 20.20 |
| Lipids a | 16.50 | 16.70 | 16.60 | 16.60 | 17.30 |
| Kcal/kg diet | 3777 | 3735 | 3738 | 3741 | 3668 |
| Magnesium | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Potassium | 0.36 | 1.65 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.81 |
| Calcium | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.48 |
| Phosphorus | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Ca/P ratio | 1.25 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 1.23 | 1.15 |
a The values represent caloric percentage contribution of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids in diets.
Figure 1Images of the left femur of growing rats showing anterior and lateral views. Coordinates indicate length (L), width (W) and thickness (T).
Mineral content in Opuntia ficus índica cladodes at different maturity stages (mg/g).
| Maturity Stage (Days) | Calcium | Phosphorus | Potassium | Magnesium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 17.2 ± 0.05 a | 2.9 ± 0.01 a | 46.3 ± 0.14 a | 7.2 ± 0.31 a |
| 60 | 29.3 ± 0.04 b | 2.2 ± 0.01 b | 39.2 ± 0.15 c | 7.4 ± 0.21 b |
| 100 | 33.5 ± 0.06 c | 1.7 ± 0.01 c | 33.1 ± 0.14 b | 7.7 ± 0.11 c |
| 135 | 39.2 ± 0.06 c | 2.2 ± 0.02 b | 34.2 ± 0.13 b | 7.6 ± 0.12 c |
The values represent mean ± standard deviation (SD), n = 5; Means in columns with different letters differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Body weight gain, food intake and food efficiency in rats fed with the control diet and the experimental diets.
| Parámetros | Control | N-60 | N-200 | N-400 | N-600 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial weight (g) | 124.8 ± 18.5 a | 124 ± 15.8 a | 124.7 ± 15.2 a | 124.7 ± 15.4 a | 124.8 ± 15.7 a |
| Final weight (g) | 334.4 ± 22.5 a | 316.7 ± 20.9 a | 341.4 ± 21.2 a | 322.8 ± 21.8 a | 346 ± 34.6 a |
| Weight gain (g) | 209.5 ± 22.6 a | 192.7 ± 22.2 a | 216.7 ± 16.7 a | 198.1 ± 19.3 a | 221.2 ± 30 a |
| Food intake (g) | 1075 ± 53.2 a | 938 ± 24.2 b | 933 ± 23.8 b | 975 ± 34.3 b | 926 ± 21.1 b |
| Food efficiency * | 0.19 ± 0.01 a | 0.2 ± 0.02 a,b,c | 0.23 ± 0.01 b,c | 0.2 ± 0.01 a,b | 0.23 ± 0.03 c |
The values represent mean ± SD n = 7; Means in rows with different letters differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05); * Food efficiency = weight gain (g)/food intake (g).
Physical and mechanical properties of the femur in rats fed with O. ficus indica as calcium source.
| Parameters | Control | N-60 | N-200 | N-400 | N-600 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length (cm) | 3.65 ± 0.09 a | 3.61 ± 0.04 a | 3.69 ± 0.07 a | 3.65 ± 0.04 a | 3.66 ± 0.09 a |
| Weight (g) | 1.03 ± 0.08 a,b | 0.95 ± 0.06 a | 1.02 ± 0.06 a,b | 1.00 ± 0.07 a,b | 1.1 ± 0.15 b |
| Width (mm) | 4.31 ± 0.12 a | 4.38 ± .23 a | 4.22 ± 0.11 a | 4.27 ± 0.14 a | 4.5 ± 0.29 a |
| Thickness (mm) | 3.18 ± 0.1 a,b | 3.05 ± 0.05 b | 3.17 ± 0.09 a,b | 3.21 ± 0.1 a,b | 3.30 ± 0.15 a |
| Three-point bending test | 98.63 ± 5.2 c | 78.58 ± 2.3 a | 90.78 ± 1.7 b | 98.78 ± 4 c | 99.34 ± 2.5 c |
| Compression test | 610.3 ± 40.6 b | 466.4 ± 29.7 a | 497.5 ± 46 a | 571.2 ± 18.5 b | 747.9 ± 97.8 c |
| 825 ± 78 a | 2554 ± 283 b | 1304 ± 230 a | 2176 ± 367 b | 2700 ± 194 b |
The values represent mean ± SD n = 7; Means in rows with different letters differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05). Fmax: failure load evaluated by the compression test; Pmax: failure load evaluated by three-point bending test.
Figure 2Microstructural parameters of the femur of male Wistar growing rats fed with O. ficus indica at different maturity stages as dietary calcium source. (A) Cortical width of femoral diaphysis (Ct.Wi); (B) trabecular thickness of femoral metaphysis (Tb.Th); (C) trabecular separation of femoral epiphyseal line growth (Tb.Sp). The values represent mean ± SD n = 7 Means in bars with different letters differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy images of different areas of the inside left femur of male Wistar growing rats fed with O. ficus indica at different maturity stages as dietary calcium source. Left to right: Control, N-60 and N-600 groups. Micrographs (A–C) show the inner part of the femur sectioned longitudinally from the line between condyles toward the diaphysis (15×); Micrographs (D–F) show the femoral metaphysis (85×); Micrographs (G–I) shows the femoral epiphyseal line growth (500×).
Mineral content and Ca/P ratio within the femur of rats fed with control and experimental diets.
| Group | Calcium (mg/g) | Phosphorous (mg/g) | Magnesium (mg/g) | Potassium (mg/g) | Ca/P Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 385.09 ± 2.2 e | 92.81 ± 1.17 c | 1.88 ± 0.015 b | 0.387 ± 3 × 10−3 b | 3.2 a |
| N-60 | 196.63 ± 3.4 a | 90.48 ± 0.37 b,c | 1.84 ± 0.021 a,b | 0.355 ± 1 × 10−3 a | 1.7 d |
| N-200 | 291.89 ± 8.6 b | 87.60 ± 0.40 a | 1.81 ± 0.029 a | 0.512 ± 7 × 10−3 b,c | 2.5 c |
| N-400 | 333.67 ± 2.3 c | 89.85 ± 1.39 a,b | 1.87 ± 0.012 b | 0.405 ± 1 × 10−3 b | 2.8 b |
| N-600 | 356.18 ± 6.8 d | 88.59 ± 0.72 a,b | 1.82 ± 0.008 a | 0.682 ± 1 × 10−3 c | 3.1 a |
Values represent mean ± SD n = 7; Means in columns with different letters differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4Bone mineral density (BMD) of the right femur of male Wistar growing rats fed with O. ficus indica at different maturity stages as dietary calcium source. Values represent mean ± SD n = 7; Means in lines with different letters differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Correlation coefficients between bone mineral density (BMD) and mechanical, microstructural properties and mineral content within the femur of growing rats.
| All Groups ( | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical properties | ||
| 0.667 | ˂0.01 | |
| 0.603 | ˂0.01 | |
| Microstructural properties | ||
| Cr.Wi | 0.460 | ˂0.05 |
| Tb.Th | 0.466 | ˂0.01 |
| Tb.Sp | −0.558 | ˂0.01 |
| Femur mineral content | ||
| Calcium | 0.544 | ˂0.05 |
| Phosphorus | N.S. | N.S. |
| Potassium | 0.654 | ˂0.05 |
| Magnesium | N.S. | N.S. |
| Ca/P ratio | 0.583 | ˂0.01 |
Fmax: failure load evaluated by the compression test; Pmax: failure load evaluated by three-point bending test; N.S.: Not significant; Tb.Th: trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp: trabecular separation; r: Pearson correlation; p: significance level.