Literature DB >> 19647962

The clinical role of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Glen M Blake1, Ignac Fogelman.   

Abstract

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) have an important role in the evaluation of individuals at risk of osteoporosis, and in helping clinicians advise patients about the appropriate use of anti-fracture treatment. Compared with alternative bone densitometry techniques, hip and spine DXA examinations have a number of advantages that include a consensus that BMD results can be interpreted using the World Health Organisation (WHO) T-score definition of osteoporosis, a proven ability to predict fracture risk, proven effectiveness at targeting anti-fracture therapies, and the ability to monitor response to treatment. This review discusses the evidence for these and other clinical aspects of DXA scanning, including its role in the new WHO algorithm for treating patients on the basis of their individual fracture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19647962     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.04.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  19 in total

Review 1.  Depression and osteoporosis: a research synthesis with meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Cizza; S Primma; M Coyle; L Gourgiotis; G Csako
Journal:  Horm Metab Res       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.936

2.  Antiepileptic medications increase osteoporosis risk in male fabry patients: bone mineral density in an Australian cohort.

Authors:  Andrew Talbot; Joanna R Ghali; Kathy Nicholls
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2014-07-26

3.  Measurement of subregional vertebral bone mineral density in vitro using lateral projection dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: validation with peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Egon Perilli; Ian H Parkinson; Susan Kantor; Tim V Wrigley; Nicola L Fazzalari; John D Wark
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  Quality assurance of imaging techniques used in the clinical management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; J Damilakis; G Solomou; A Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Finite element analysis of the hip and spine based on quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Dana Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Factors that characterize bone health with aging in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Shota Ikegami; Shigeharu Uchiyama; Yukio Nakamura; Keijiro Mukaiyama; Hiroki Hirabayashi; Mikio Kamimura; Kiichi Nonaka; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 7.  Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Judith E Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 8.  Bone health in children and adolescents: the available imaging techniques.

Authors:  Stefano Stagi; Loredana Cavalli; Chiara Iurato; Salvatore Seminara; Maria Luisa Brandi; Maurizio de Martino
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-09

9.  Long-term experiment to study the development, interaction, and influencing factors of DEXA parameters.

Authors:  Helmut Fuchs; Christine Gau; Wolfgang Hans; Valerie Gailus-Durner; Martin Hrabě de Angelis
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  Trabecular bone structure analysis of the spine using clinical MDCT: can it predict vertebral bone strength?

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Martin Gräbeldinger; Christoph Räth; Eduardo Grande Garcia; Rainer Burgkart; Janina M Patsch; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.