Literature DB >> 28164396

Improved multiparametric MRI discrimination between low-risk prostate cancer and benign tissues in a small cohort of 5α-reductase inhibitor treated individuals as compared with an untreated cohort.

Olga Starobinets1,2, John Kurhanewicz1,2, Susan M Noworolski1,2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) affect the discrimination between low-grade prostate cancer and benign tissues on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Twenty men with biopsy-proven Gleason 3 + 3 prostate cancer and 3 T mpMRI were studied. Ten patients (Tx) had been receiving 5-ARIs for at least a year at scan time. Ten untreated patients (Un) were matched to the treated cohort. For each subject two regions of interest representing cancerous and benign tissues were drawn within the peripheral zone of each prostate, MR measures evaluated, and cancer contrast versus benign (contrast = (MRTumor  - MRHealthy )/MRHealthy ) calculated. Decreased cancer contrast was noted on T2 -weighted images: 0.4 (Un) versus 0.3 (Tx). However, for functional MR measures, a better separation of cancerous and benign tissues was observed in the treated group. Cancer contrast on high-b diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was 0.61 (Un) versus 0.99 (Tx). Logistic regression analysis yielded higher AUC (area under the curve) values for distinguishing cancerous from benign regions in treated subjects on high-b DWI (0.71 (Un), 0.94 (Tx)), maximal enhancement slope (0.95 (Un), 1 (Tx)), peak enhancement (0.84 (Un), 0.93 (Tx)), washout slope (0.78 (Un), 0.99 (Tx)), Ktrans (0.9 (Un), 1 (Tx)), and combined measures (0.86 (Un), 0.99 (Tx)). Coefficients of variation for MR measures were lower in benign and cancerous tissues in the treated group compared with the untreated group. This study's results suggest an increase in homogeneity of benign and malignant peripheral zone prostatic tissues with 5-ARI exposure, observed as reduced variability of MR measures after treatment. Cancer discrimination was lower with T2 -weighted imaging, but was higher with functional MR measures in a 5-ARI-treated cohort compared with controls.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5α-reductase inhibitors; dutasteride; finasteride; mpMRI; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28164396      PMCID: PMC5522750          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  46 in total

1.  Comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS).

Authors:  J Curtis Nickel; Peter Gilling; Teuvo L Tammela; Betsy Morrill; Timothy H Wilson; Roger S Rittmaster
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Multiparametric 3T endorectal mri after external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; Galen D Reed; Phillip P Vinh; Christopher Sotto; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Effect of finasteride on the sensitivity of PSA for detecting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Chen Chi; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; Scott M Lippman; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Effects of endocrine therapy on the primary lesion in patients with prostate carcinoma as evaluated by endorectal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J Nakashima; Y Imai; M Tachibana; S Baba; K Hiramatsu; M Murai
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Targeting 5α-reductase for prostate cancer prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Lucas P Nacusi; Donald J Tindall
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Biopsy Gleason score: how does it correlate with the final pathological diagnosis in prostate cancer?

Authors:  E T Fernandes; C P Sundaram; R Long; M Soltani; C J Ercole
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-04

Review 7.  Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: an update on state-of-the-art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer.

Authors:  John V Hegde; Robert V Mulkern; Lawrence P Panych; Fiona M Fennessy; Andriy Fedorov; Stephan E Maier; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  An overview on 5alpha-reductase inhibitors.

Authors:  Saurabh Aggarwal; Suresh Thareja; Abhilasha Verma; Tilak Raj Bhardwaj; Manoj Kumar
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 2.668

9.  Reduced-FOV excitation decreases susceptibility artifact in diffusion-weighted MRI with endorectal coil for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Natalie Korn; John Kurhanewicz; Suchandrima Banerjee; Olga Starobinets; Emine Saritas; Susan Noworolski
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 10.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  2 in total

1.  A direct comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection and prediction of aggressiveness.

Authors:  Alexander D J Baur; Julia Schwabe; Julian Rogasch; Andreas Maxeiner; Tobias Penzkofer; Carsten Stephan; Marc Rudl; Bernd Hamm; Ernst-Michael Jung; Thom Fischer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Imaging and clinical features of giant multilocular prostatic cystadenoma: A case report.

Authors:  Jingya Chen; Wei Zhang; Hu Chen; Yajing Wang; Zhengjun Li; Huiming Wu; Jian Zhang; Zhongqiu Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.