Ramon Casanova1, Santiago Saldana1, Michael W Lutz2, Brenda L Plassman2,3, Maragatha Kuchibhatla4, Kathleen M Hayden5. 1. Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina. 2. Department of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 5. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Genetic risks for cognitive decline are not modifiable; however their relative importance compared to modifiable factors is unclear. We used machine learning to evaluate modifiable and genetic risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD), to predict cognitive decline. METHODS: Health and Retirement Study participants, aged 65-90 years, with DNA and >2 cognitive evaluations, were included (n = 7,142). Predictors included age, body mass index, gender, education, APOE ε4, cardiovascular, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES), and AD risk genes. Latent class trajectory analyses of cognitive scores determined the form and number of classes. Random Forests (RF) classification investigated predictors of cognitive trajectories. Performance metrics (accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity) were reported. RESULTS: Three classes were identified. Discriminating highest from lowest classes produced the best RF performance: accuracy = 78% (1.0%), sensitivity = 75% (1.0%), and specificity = 81% (1.0%). Top ranked predictors were education, age, gender, stroke, NSES, and diabetes, APOE ε4 carrier status, and body mass index (BMI). When discriminating high from medium classes, top predictors were education, age, gender, stroke, diabetes, NSES, and BMI. When discriminating medium from the low classes, education, NSES, age, diabetes, and stroke were top predictors. DISCUSSION: The combination of latent trajectories and RF classification techniques suggested that nongenetic factors contribute more to cognitive decline than genetic factors. Education was the most relevant predictor for discrimination.
OBJECTIVES: Genetic risks for cognitive decline are not modifiable; however their relative importance compared to modifiable factors is unclear. We used machine learning to evaluate modifiable and genetic risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD), to predict cognitive decline. METHODS: Health and Retirement Study participants, aged 65-90 years, with DNA and >2 cognitive evaluations, were included (n = 7,142). Predictors included age, body mass index, gender, education, APOE ε4, cardiovascular, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES), and AD risk genes. Latent class trajectory analyses of cognitive scores determined the form and number of classes. Random Forests (RF) classification investigated predictors of cognitive trajectories. Performance metrics (accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity) were reported. RESULTS: Three classes were identified. Discriminating highest from lowest classes produced the best RF performance: accuracy = 78% (1.0%), sensitivity = 75% (1.0%), and specificity = 81% (1.0%). Top ranked predictors were education, age, gender, stroke, NSES, and diabetes, APOE ε4 carrier status, and body mass index (BMI). When discriminating high from medium classes, top predictors were education, age, gender, stroke, diabetes, NSES, and BMI. When discriminating medium from the low classes, education, NSES, age, diabetes, and stroke were top predictors. DISCUSSION: The combination of latent trajectories and RF classification techniques suggested that nongenetic factors contribute more to cognitive decline than genetic factors. Education was the most relevant predictor for discrimination.
Authors: K Yaffe; A M Kanaya; K Lindquist; W C Hsueh; S R Cummings; B Beamer; A Newman; C Rosano; R Li; T Harris Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2006-10-18 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Katie S Shpanskaya; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Christopher Hostage; Kelly R Murphy; Jeffrey R Petrella; P Murali Doraiswamy Journal: J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 3.447
Authors: Sarah E Vermeer; Niels D Prins; Tom den Heijer; Albert Hofman; Peter J Koudstaal; Monique M B Breteler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Payton; L Gibbons; Y Davidson; W Ollier; P Rabbitt; J Worthington; A Pickles; N Pendleton; M Horan Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Prashanthi Vemuri; Timothy G Lesnick; Scott A Przybelski; Mary Machulda; David S Knopman; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Yonas E Geda; Walter A Rocca; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Jacob S Elkins; S Claiborne Johnston; Elad Ziv; Deborah Kado; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Yaffe Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-07-16 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Helen Christensen; Philip J Batterham; Andrew J Mackinnon; Anthony F Jorm; Holly A Mack; Karen A Mather; Kaarin J Anstey; Perminder S Sachdev; Simon Easteal Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2008-07-14 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: May A Beydoun; Hind A Beydoun; Alyssa A Gamaldo; Alison Teel; Alan B Zonderman; Youfa Wang Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ramon Casanova; Sarah A Gaussoin; Robert Wallace; Laura D Baker; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; JoAnn E Manson; Victor W Henderson; Bonnie C Sachs; Jamie N Justice; Eric A Whitsel; Kathleen M Hayden; Stephen R Rapp Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: S Ali Naqvi; Graham C Thompson; Ari R Joffe; Jaime Blackwood; Dori-Ann Martin; Mary Brindle; Herman W Barkema; Craig N Jenne Journal: Mediators Inflamm Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 4.711
Authors: Ramon Casanova; Fang-Chi Hsu; Ryan T Barnard; Andrea M Anderson; Rajesh Talluri; Christopher T Whitlow; Timothy M Hughes; Michael Griswold; Kathleen M Hayden; Rebecca F Gottesman; Lynne E Wagenknecht Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 16.655