Literature DB >> 28163805

Evidence-based guideline recommendations on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline.

Masoom A Haider1, Xiaomei Yao2, Andrew Loblaw1, Antonio Finelli3.   

Abstract

This clinical guideline focuses on: 1) the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) in patients with an elevated risk of CSPC and who are biopsy-naïve; and 2) the use of mpMRI in diagnosing CSPC in patients with a persistently elevated risk of having CSPC and who have a negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy. The methods of the Practice Guideline Development Cycle were used. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (1997‒April 2014), main guideline websites, and relevant annual meeting abstracts (2011‒2014) were searched. Internal and external reviews were conducted. The two main recommendations are: Recommendation 1: In patients with an elevated risk of CSPC (according to prostate-specific antigen [PSA] levels and/or nomograms) who are biopsy-naïve: mpMRI followed by targeted biopsy (biopsy directed at cancer-suspicious foci detected with mpMRI) should not be considered the standard of care.Data from future research studies are essential and should receive high-impact trial funding to determine the value of mpMRI in this clinical context.Recommendation 2: In patients who had a prior negative TRUS-guided systematic biopsy and demonstrate an increasing risk of having CSPC since prior biopsy (e.g., continued rise in PSA and/or change in findings from digital rectal examination): mpMRI followed by targeted biopsy may be considered to help in detecting more CSPC patients compared with repeated TRUS-guided systematic biopsy.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28163805      PMCID: PMC5262504          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  32 in total

1.  High diagnostic ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect anterior prostate cancer missed by transrectal 12-core biopsy.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Komai; Noboru Numao; Soichiro Yoshida; Yoh Matsuoka; Yasukazu Nakanishi; Chikako Ishii; Fumitaka Koga; Kazutaka Saito; Hitoshi Masuda; Yasuhisa Fujii; Satoru Kawakami; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Jérémie Haffner; Laurent Lemaitre; Philippe Puech; Georges-Pascal Haber; Xavier Leroy; J Stephen Jones; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Prospective evaluation of 3-T MRI performed before initial transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with high prostate-specific antigen and no previous biopsy.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park; Jong Wook Park; Seo Yong Park; Chan Kyo Kim; Hyun Moo Lee; Seong Soo Jeon; Seong Il Seo; Byong Chang Jeong; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.

Authors:  Caroline M A Hoeks; Martijn G Schouten; Joyce G R Bomers; Stefan P Hoogendoorn; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Thomas Hambrock; Henk Vergunst; J P Michiel Sedelaar; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  First round of targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion compared with conventional transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies for the diagnosis of localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pierre Mozer; Morgan Rouprêt; Chloé Le Cossec; Benjamin Granger; Eva Comperat; Arachk de Gorski; Olivier Cussenot; Raphaële Renard-Penna
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Diagnosis of relevant prostate cancer using supplementary cores from magnetic resonance imaging-prompted areas following multiple failed biopsies.

Authors:  Daniel N Costa; B Nicolas Bloch; David F Yao; Martin G Sanda; Long Ngo; Elizabeth M Genega; Ivan Pedrosa; William C DeWolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 7.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  M A Haider; X Yao; A Loblaw; A Finelli
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 4.126

Review 8.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsies and elevated prostate-specific antigen levels: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zai-Xian Zhang; Jia Yang; Cheng-Zhong Zhang; Kang-An Li; Qi-Meng Quan; Xi-Fu Wang; Han Wang; Gui-Xiang Zhang
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  A meta-analysis of the accuracy of prostate cancer studies which use magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Peng Wang; You-min Guo; Min Liu; Yong-qian Qiang; Xiao-juan Guo; Yi-li Zhang; Xiao-Yi Duan; Qiu-Juan Zhang; Weifeng Liang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  5 in total

1.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging - Transrectal ultrasound-guided cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate: Clinically significant cancer detection rates stratified by the Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 assessment category.

Authors:  Susan John; Steven Cooper; Rodney H Breau; Trevor A Flood; Ilias Cagiannos; Luke T Lavallee; Christopher Morash; Joseph O'sullivan; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection: Systematic and/or magnetic-resonance imaging-targeted.

Authors:  Franck Bladou; Cora Fogaing; Mark Levental; Samuel Aronson; Mona Alameldin; Maurice Anidjar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Recommandations de l'Association des urologues du Canada sur le dépistage et le diagnostic précoce du cancer de la prostate.

Authors:  Ricardo A Rendon; Ross J Mason; Karim Marzouk; Antonio Finelli; Fred Saad; Alan So; Phillipe Violette; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Case - Foamy, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: A false positive for prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  Thenappan Chandrasekar; Hanan Goldberg; Zachary Klaassen; Nathan Perlis; Antonio Finelli; Andrew Evans; Sangeet Ghai
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Evidence-based guideline recommendations on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario updated clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Masoom A Haider; Judy Brown; Jospeh L K Chin; Nauthan Perlis; Nicola Schieda; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.862

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.