Literature DB >> 24552477

First round of targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion compared with conventional transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies for the diagnosis of localised prostate cancer.

Pierre Mozer1, Morgan Rouprêt, Chloé Le Cossec, Benjamin Granger, Eva Comperat, Arachk de Gorski, Olivier Cussenot, Raphaële Renard-Penna.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion to guide first-round biopsies in the diagnosis of localised prostate cancer (PCa) in men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤10 ng/mL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on men who met the following criteria: first-round biopsy, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) showing a lesion with a Likert score ≥2 and a PSA <10 ng/mL. All men underwent a extended 12-core protocol plus a protocol of two or three targeted cores on the mpMRI index lesion. The UroStation (Koelis, Grenoble, France) and a V10 ultrasound system with an end-fire three-dimensional TRUS transducer were used for the fusion imaging procedure. Significant PCa was defined as: at least one core with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or 6 with a maximum cancer core length ≥4 mm.
RESULTS: A total of 152 men, whose median PSA level was 6 ng/mL, were included in the study. The proportion of positive cores was significantly higher with the targeted-core protocol than with the extended 12-core protocol (P < 0.001). The proportion of men with clinically significant PCa was higher with the targeted-core protocol than with the extended 12-core protocol (P = 0.03). The proportion of patients having at least one positive biopsy (targeted-core protocol) was significantly different among the Likert score categories (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: For the first round of biopsies, MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted biopsies detected more men with clinically significant PCa than did standard extended 12-core biopsy alone.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason score; MRI; biopsy; prostate neoplasms; prostate-specific antigen

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24552477     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  44 in total

Review 1.  Targeted prostate biopsy and MR-guided therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  David A Woodrum; Akira Kawashima; Krzysztof R Gorny; Lance A Mynderse
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Arvin K George; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Armando Stabile; Francesco Giganti; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja; Geert Villeirs; Inderbir S Gill; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore; Veeru Kasivisvanathan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  [MRI/TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy : Value in the context of focal therapy].

Authors:  T Franz; J von Hardenberg; A Blana; H Cash; D Baumunk; G Salomon; B Hadaschik; T Henkel; J Herrmann; F Kahmann; K-U Köhrmann; J Köllermann; S Kruck; U-B Liehr; S Machtens; I Peters; J P Radtke; A Roosen; H-P Schlemmer; L Sentker; J J Wendler; U Witzsch; J-U Stolzenburg; M Schostak; R Ganzer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies vs. magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies: Who are the best candidates?

Authors:  Elsa Bey; Olivier Gaget; Jean-Luc Descotes; Quentin Franquet; Jean-Jacques Rambeaud; Jean-Alexandre Long; Gaelle Fiard
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies.

Authors:  Antoine van Hove; Pierre-Henri Savoie; Charlotte Maurin; Serge Brunelle; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Naji Salem; Jochen Walz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Novel Imaging of Prostate Cancer with MRI, MRI/US, and PET.

Authors:  Phillip J Koo; Jennifer J Kwak; Sajal Pokharel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Score 3 prostate lesions: a gray zone for PI-RADS v2.

Authors:  Michele Scialpi; Eugenio Martorana; Maria Cristina Aisa; Valeria Rondoni; Alfredo D'Andrea; Giampaolo Bianchi
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-08-03

9.  Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection: Systematic and/or magnetic-resonance imaging-targeted.

Authors:  Franck Bladou; Cora Fogaing; Mark Levental; Samuel Aronson; Mona Alameldin; Maurice Anidjar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging and molecular pathology at the crossroad of the management of early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Raphaele Renard-Penna; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Eva Comperat; Morgan Roupret; Pierre Mozer; Olivier Cussenot
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.