Literature DB >> 35133265

Evidence-based guideline recommendations on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario updated clinical practice guideline.

Masoom A Haider1, Judy Brown2, Jospeh L K Chin3, Nauthan Perlis4, Nicola Schieda5, Andrew Loblaw6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic review to assess the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) for biopsy-naive men and men with a prior negative transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy (TRUS-SB) at elevated risk.
METHODS: The methods of the clinical practice guideline included searches to September of 2020 of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Internal and external reviews were conducted.
RESULTS: The recommendations are:Recommendation 1: For biopsy-naive patients at elevated risk of csPCa, mpMRI is recommended prior to biopsy in patients who are candidates for curative management with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer.- If the mpMRI is positive, mpMRI-targeted biopsy (TB) and TRUS-SB should be performed together to maximize detection of csPCa.- If the mpMRI is negative, consider forgoing any biopsy after discussion of the risks and benefits with the patient as part of shared decision-making and ongoing followup.Recommendation 2: In patients who had a prior negative TRUS-SB and demonstrate a high risk of having csPCa in whom curative management is being considered:- mpMRI should be performed.- If the mpMRI is positive, targeted biopsy should be performed. Concomitant TRUS-SB can be considered depending on the patient's risk profile and time since prior TRUS-SB biopsy.- If the mpMRI is negative, consider forgoing a TRUS-SB only after discussion of the risks and benefits with the patient as part of shared decision-making and ongoing followup.Recommendation 3: mpMRI should be performed and interpreted in compliance with the current Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35133265      PMCID: PMC8932419          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  49 in total

1.  Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.

Authors:  Alexander P Kenigsberg; Audrey Renson; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Richard Huang; James S Wysock; Samir S Taneja; Marc A Bjurlin
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-10-05

2.  Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.

Authors:  Marloes van der Leest; Erik Cornel; Bas Israël; Rianne Hendriks; Anwar R Padhani; Martijn Hoogenboom; Patrik Zamecnik; Dirk Bakker; Anglita Yanti Setiasti; Jeroen Veltman; Huib van den Hout; Hans van der Lelij; Inge van Oort; Sjoerd Klaver; Frans Debruyne; Michiel Sedelaar; Gerjon Hannink; Maroeska Rovers; Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Prospective comparison of transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion biopsy and transrectal systematic biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.

Authors:  Angelika Borkowetz; Boris Hadaschik; Ivan Platzek; Marieta Toma; Georgi Torsev; Theresa Renner; Roman Herout; Martin Baunacke; Michael Laniado; Gustavo Baretton; Jan Philipp Radtke; Claudia Kesch; Markus Hohenfellner; Michael Froehner; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Manfred Wirth; Stefan Zastrow
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Is it Time to Perform Only Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Cores? Our Experience with 1,032 Men Who Underwent Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Antonio Garufi; Gian Domenico Priolo; Antonio Galia; Filippo Fraggetta; Michele Pennisi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.

Authors:  Olivier Wegelin; Leonie Exterkate; Marloes van der Leest; Jean A Kummer; Willem Vreuls; Peter C de Bruin; J L H Ruud Bosch; Jelle O Barentsz; Diederik M Somford; Harm H E van Melick
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Systematic prostate biopsy still matters: A comprehensive analysis of MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies across different indications.

Authors:  Niklas Westhoff; Bettina Baeßler; Jost von Hardenberg; Svetlana Hetjens; Stefan Porubsky; Fabian Siegel; Thomas Martini; Maurice Stephan Michel; Ulrike Attenberger; Manuel Ritter
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Edward Chang; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J Margolis; Malu Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Robert E Reiter; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Accuracy of Transperineal Targeted Prostate Biopsies, Visual Estimation and Image Fusion in Men Needing Repeat Biopsy in the PICTURE Trial.

Authors:  Lucy A M Simmons; Abi Kanthabalan; Manit Arya; Tim Briggs; Dean Barratt; Susan C Charman; Alex Freeman; David Hawkes; Yipeng Hu; Charles Jameson; Neil McCartan; Caroline M Moore; Shonit Punwani; Jan van der Muelen; Mark Emberton; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Characteristics of Prostate Cancer Found at Fifth Screening in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Rotterdam: Can We Selectively Detect High-grade Prostate Cancer with Upfront Multivariable Risk Stratification and Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Authors:  Arnout R Alberts; Ivo G Schoots; Leonard P Bokhorst; Frank-Jan H Drost; Geert J van Leenders; Gabriel P Krestin; Roy S Dwarkasing; Jelle O Barentsz; Fritz H Schröder; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Antti S Rannikko; Marcelo Borghi; Valeria Panebianco; Lance A Mynderse; Markku H Vaarala; Alberto Briganti; Lars Budäus; Giles Hellawell; Richard G Hindley; Monique J Roobol; Scott Eggener; Maneesh Ghei; Arnauld Villers; Franck Bladou; Geert M Villeirs; Jaspal Virdi; Silvan Boxler; Grégoire Robert; Paras B Singh; Wulphert Venderink; Boris A Hadaschik; Alain Ruffion; Jim C Hu; Daniel Margolis; Sébastien Crouzet; Laurence Klotz; Samir S Taneja; Peter Pinto; Inderbir Gill; Clare Allen; Francesco Giganti; Alex Freeman; Stephen Morris; Shonit Punwani; Norman R Williams; Chris Brew-Graves; Jonathan Deeks; Yemisi Takwoingi; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 176.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  UPDATE - 2022 Canadian Urological Association recommendations on prostate cancer screening and early diagnosis Endorsement of the 2021 Cancer Care Ontario guidelines on prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging - Summary of changes.

Authors:  Ross J Mason; Karim Marzouk; Antonio Finelli; Fred Saad; Alan I So; Phillipe D Violette; Rodney H Breau; Ricardo A Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  UPDATE - 2022 Canadian Urological Association recommendations on prostate cancer screening and early diagnosis Endorsement of the 2021 Cancer Care Ontario guidelines on prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ross J Mason; Karim Marzouk; Antonio Finelli; Fred Saad; Alan I So; Philippe D Violette; Rodney H Breau; Ricardo A Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.052

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.