Masoom A Haider1, Judy Brown2, Jospeh L K Chin3, Nauthan Perlis4, Nicola Schieda5, Andrew Loblaw6. 1. Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Program in Evidence-based Care, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada. 3. London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital, London, ON, Canada. 4. Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 6. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic review to assess the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) for biopsy-naive men and men with a prior negative transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy (TRUS-SB) at elevated risk. METHODS: The methods of the clinical practice guideline included searches to September of 2020 of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Internal and external reviews were conducted. RESULTS: The recommendations are:Recommendation 1: For biopsy-naive patients at elevated risk of csPCa, mpMRI is recommended prior to biopsy in patients who are candidates for curative management with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer.- If the mpMRI is positive, mpMRI-targeted biopsy (TB) and TRUS-SB should be performed together to maximize detection of csPCa.- If the mpMRI is negative, consider forgoing any biopsy after discussion of the risks and benefits with the patient as part of shared decision-making and ongoing followup.Recommendation 2: In patients who had a prior negative TRUS-SB and demonstrate a high risk of having csPCa in whom curative management is being considered:- mpMRI should be performed.- If the mpMRI is positive, targeted biopsy should be performed. Concomitant TRUS-SB can be considered depending on the patient's risk profile and time since prior TRUS-SB biopsy.- If the mpMRI is negative, consider forgoing a TRUS-SB only after discussion of the risks and benefits with the patient as part of shared decision-making and ongoing followup.Recommendation 3: mpMRI should be performed and interpreted in compliance with the current Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines.
INTRODUCTION: This clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic review to assess the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) for biopsy-naive men and men with a prior negative transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy (TRUS-SB) at elevated risk. METHODS: The methods of the clinical practice guideline included searches to September of 2020 of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Internal and external reviews were conducted. RESULTS: The recommendations are:Recommendation 1: For biopsy-naive patients at elevated risk of csPCa, mpMRI is recommended prior to biopsy in patients who are candidates for curative management with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer.- If the mpMRI is positive, mpMRI-targeted biopsy (TB) and TRUS-SB should be performed together to maximize detection of csPCa.- If the mpMRI is negative, consider forgoing any biopsy after discussion of the risks and benefits with the patient as part of shared decision-making and ongoing followup.Recommendation 2: In patients who had a prior negative TRUS-SB and demonstrate a high risk of having csPCa in whom curative management is being considered:- mpMRI should be performed.- If the mpMRI is positive, targeted biopsy should be performed. Concomitant TRUS-SB can be considered depending on the patient's risk profile and time since prior TRUS-SB biopsy.- If the mpMRI is negative, consider forgoing a TRUS-SB only after discussion of the risks and benefits with the patient as part of shared decision-making and ongoing followup.Recommendation 3: mpMRI should be performed and interpreted in compliance with the current Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines.
Authors: Alexander P Kenigsberg; Audrey Renson; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Richard Huang; James S Wysock; Samir S Taneja; Marc A Bjurlin Journal: Eur Urol Oncol Date: 2018-10-05
Authors: Marloes van der Leest; Erik Cornel; Bas Israël; Rianne Hendriks; Anwar R Padhani; Martijn Hoogenboom; Patrik Zamecnik; Dirk Bakker; Anglita Yanti Setiasti; Jeroen Veltman; Huib van den Hout; Hans van der Lelij; Inge van Oort; Sjoerd Klaver; Frans Debruyne; Michiel Sedelaar; Gerjon Hannink; Maroeska Rovers; Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Jelle O Barentsz Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Angelika Borkowetz; Boris Hadaschik; Ivan Platzek; Marieta Toma; Georgi Torsev; Theresa Renner; Roman Herout; Martin Baunacke; Michael Laniado; Gustavo Baretton; Jan Philipp Radtke; Claudia Kesch; Markus Hohenfellner; Michael Froehner; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Manfred Wirth; Stefan Zastrow Journal: BJU Int Date: 2017-10-15 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Olivier Wegelin; Leonie Exterkate; Marloes van der Leest; Jean A Kummer; Willem Vreuls; Peter C de Bruin; J L H Ruud Bosch; Jelle O Barentsz; Diederik M Somford; Harm H E van Melick Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Geoffrey A Sonn; Edward Chang; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J Margolis; Malu Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Robert E Reiter; Leonard S Marks Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-03-17 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Lucy A M Simmons; Abi Kanthabalan; Manit Arya; Tim Briggs; Dean Barratt; Susan C Charman; Alex Freeman; David Hawkes; Yipeng Hu; Charles Jameson; Neil McCartan; Caroline M Moore; Shonit Punwani; Jan van der Muelen; Mark Emberton; Hashim U Ahmed Journal: J Urol Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Arnout R Alberts; Ivo G Schoots; Leonard P Bokhorst; Frank-Jan H Drost; Geert J van Leenders; Gabriel P Krestin; Roy S Dwarkasing; Jelle O Barentsz; Fritz H Schröder; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Antti S Rannikko; Marcelo Borghi; Valeria Panebianco; Lance A Mynderse; Markku H Vaarala; Alberto Briganti; Lars Budäus; Giles Hellawell; Richard G Hindley; Monique J Roobol; Scott Eggener; Maneesh Ghei; Arnauld Villers; Franck Bladou; Geert M Villeirs; Jaspal Virdi; Silvan Boxler; Grégoire Robert; Paras B Singh; Wulphert Venderink; Boris A Hadaschik; Alain Ruffion; Jim C Hu; Daniel Margolis; Sébastien Crouzet; Laurence Klotz; Samir S Taneja; Peter Pinto; Inderbir Gill; Clare Allen; Francesco Giganti; Alex Freeman; Stephen Morris; Shonit Punwani; Norman R Williams; Chris Brew-Graves; Jonathan Deeks; Yemisi Takwoingi; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-03-18 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Ross J Mason; Karim Marzouk; Antonio Finelli; Fred Saad; Alan I So; Phillipe D Violette; Rodney H Breau; Ricardo A Rendon Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Ross J Mason; Karim Marzouk; Antonio Finelli; Fred Saad; Alan I So; Philippe D Violette; Rodney H Breau; Ricardo A Rendon Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 2.052