| Literature DB >> 28158979 |
Huiyun Yang1, Jingwen Lv2, Xi Zhou2, Huitong Liu3, Baibing Mi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nurses' turnover is a major contributor to nursing shortages, strongly influenced by nurses' intentions to leave. Several factors influencing the turnover intention have been well identified in Western countries and large cities in China. However, whether these factors also contribute to nurses' work stress in Midwest China are still unclear. The main purpose of this study was to examine the work pressure and associated factors influencing the nurses' intent to leave.Entities:
Keywords: Midwest China; Nurses; Turnover intention; Work stress
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28158979 PMCID: PMC5292011 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2056-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
Fig. 1Hypothesized relationship between different factors and nurse's intension to leave
Fig. 2Flowchart of recruitment processes
Comparative characteristics of surveyed nurses, by turnover intention
| Variable | Turnover intention ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong/very strong ( | Weak ( | Very weak ( | Total |
| ||||
|
| (%) |
| (%) |
| (%) | |||
| Mean age, in years | 30.09 ± 7.05 | 30.03 ± 7.17 | 29.00 ± 5.43 | 0.0791a | ||||
| Mean experience, in years | 8.49 ± 8.09 | 8.62 ± 7.93 | 7.58 ± 6.14 | 0.8792 | ||||
| Nationality | 0.6016 | |||||||
| Han | 136 | (19.24) | 438 | (61.95) | 133 | (18.81) | 707 | |
| Minority | 2 | (14.29) | 9 | (64.29) | 3 | (21.43) | 14 | |
| Marital status | 0.6934 | |||||||
| Unmarried | 55 | (19.37) | 180 | (63.38) | 49 | (17.25) | 284 | |
| Married | 83 | (19.17) | 263 | (60.74) | 87 | (20.09) | 433 | |
| Widowed | 0 | (0.00) | 4 | (100) | 0 | (0.00) | 4 | |
| Number of children | 0.3588 | |||||||
| None | 3 | (10.71) | 22 | (78.57) | 3 | (10.71) | 28 | |
| One child | 72 | (20.63) | 214 | (61.32) | 63 | (18.05) | 349 | |
| Two children | 63 | (18.75) | 206 | (61.31) | 67 | (19.94) | 336 | |
| Three children | 0 | (0.00) | 5 | (62.50) | 3 | (37.50) | 8 | |
| Primary education | 0.8040 | |||||||
| Nursing school | 54 | (18.75) | 177 | (61.46) | 57 | (19.79) | 288 | |
| Junior college | 68 | (18.48) | 232 | (63.04) | 68 | (18.48) | 368 | |
| College | 16 | (24.62) | 38 | (58.46) | 11 | (16.92) | 65 | |
| Highest level of education | 0.3068 | |||||||
| Nursing school | 9 | (31.03) | 15 | (51.72) | 5 | (17.24) | 29 | |
| Junior college | 45 | (16.67) | 174 | (64.44) | 51 | (18.89) | 270 | |
| College | 82 | (19.85) | 255 | (61.74) | 76 | (18.40) | 413 | |
| Professional title | 0.0497 | |||||||
| Resident nurse | 73 | (20.00) | 225 | (61.64) | 67 | (18.36) | 365 | |
| Nurse | 43 | (18.53) | 136 | (58.62) | 53 | (22.84) | 232 | |
| Fellow | 16 | (14.55) | 79 | (71.82) | 15 | (13.64) | 110 | |
| Nurse-in-chief | 6 | (42.86) | 7 | (50.00) | 1 | (7.14) | 14 | |
| Job responsibilities | 0.0679 | |||||||
| Nurse | 87 | (18.59) | 299 | (63.89) | 82 | (17.52) | 468 | |
| Teaching nurse | 22 | (15.94) | 81 | (58.70) | 35 | (25.36) | 138 | |
| Team leader | 12 | (27.27) | 21 | (47.73) | 11 | (25.00) | 44 | |
| Head nurse | 17 | (23.94) | 46 | (64.79) | 8 | (11.27) | 71 | |
| Authorized level | 0.1797 | |||||||
| Formal nurse | 40 | (20.51) | 129 | (66.15) | 26 | (13.33) | 195 | |
| Contract nurse | 98 | (18.63) | 318 | (60.46) | 110 | (20.91) | 526 | |
| Income | 0.9590 | |||||||
| < 322 US dollars | 25 | (16.78) | 96 | (64.43) | 28 | (18.79) | 149 | |
| 322 ~ 483 US dollars | 57 | (17.33) | 207 | (62.92) | 65 | (19.76) | 329 | |
| 484 ~ 644 US dollars | 36 | (21.82) | 97 | (58.79) | 32 | (19.39) | 165 | |
| ≥ 645 US dollars | 14 | (17.95) | 49 | (62.82) | 15 | (19.23) | 78 | |
| Position | 0.8656 | |||||||
| Clinical work | 125 | (19.14) | 408 | (62.48) | 120 | (18.38) | 653 | |
| Administrative work | 2 | (33.33) | 3 | (50.00) | 1 | (16.67) | 6 | |
| Medical-technical | 1 | (12.50) | 7 | (87.50) | 0 | 8 | ||
| Assistant | 3 | (18.75) | 8 | (50.00) | 5 | (31.25) | 16 | |
| Others | 6 | (23.08) | 15 | (57.69) | 5 | (19.23) | 26 | |
aLikelihood ratio of the chi-square value
Chi-square tests among groups between organization details of the participants
| Variable | Turnover intention ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong/very strong | Weak | Very weak | Total |
| ||||
|
| (%) |
| (%) |
| (%) | |||
| Department | 0.3114b | |||||||
| Surgery | 44 | (16.99) | 166 | (64.09) | 49 | (18.92) | 259 | |
| Medicine | 46 | (22.89) | 116 | (57.71) | 39 | (19.40) | 201 | |
| Emergency | 17 | (23.61) | 43 | (59.72) | 12 | (16.67) | 72 | |
| Operating room | 2 | (5.56) | 25 | (69.44) | 9 | (25.00) | 36 | |
| Outpatient | 2 | (8.70) | 14 | (60.87) | 7 | (30.43) | 23 | |
| Pediatric | 9 | (26.47) | 20 | (58.82) | 5 | (14.71) | 34 | |
| Others | 18 | (18.75) | 64 | (66.67) | 14 | (14.58) | 96 | |
| Hospital level | 0.0428a | |||||||
| Tertiary hospital | 125 | (20.49) | 376 | (61.64) | 109 | (17.87) | 610 | |
| Secondary hospital | 13 | (11.71) | 71 | (63.96) | 27 | (24.32) | 111 | |
| Overtime work | 1.96 ± 3.31 | 1.87 ± 2.94 | 1.43 ± 2.53 | 0.4283 | ||||
| Ratio of nurses and beds | 0.65 ± 0.60 | 0.75 ± 0.88 | 0.73 ± 0.85 | 0.8397 | ||||
| Hospital location | ||||||||
| Urban | 128 | (19.25) | 409 | (61.50) | 128 | (19.25) | 665 | |
| Suburban | 6 | (23.08) | 15 | (57.69) | 5 | (19.23) | 26 | |
| County | 4 | (14.81) | 20 | (74.07) | 3 | (11.11) | 27 | |
| Socioeconomic status of the community | 0.2881 | |||||||
| Advanced | 49 | (22.79) | 122 | (56.74) | 44 | (20.47) | 215 | |
| Average | 74 | (17.62) | 265 | (63.10) | 81 | (19.29) | 420 | |
| Underdeveloped | 13 | (17.33) | 52 | (69.33) | 10 | (13.33) | 75 | |
aLikelihood ratio of the chi-square value
bRao-Scott chi-square value, stratified according to hospital and the level of the hospital
Chi-square tests among groups between social/organizational measures
| Variable | Turnover intention ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong | Weak | Very weak | Total | ||||
|
| (%) |
| (%) |
| (%) | ||
| Prestige of working environment n (%), | |||||||
| Very low | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Low | 2 | (16.67) | 7 | (58.33) | 3 | (25.00) | 12 |
| High | 98 | (19.80) | 303 | (61.21) | 94 | (18.99) | 495 |
| Very high | 38 | (17.76) | 137 | (64.02) | 39 | (18.22) | 214 |
| Organizational commitment n (%), | |||||||
| Very low | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Low | 12 | (30.00) | 20 | (50.00) | 8 | (20.00) | 40 |
| High | 109 | (19.12) | 357 | (62.63) | 104 | (18.25) | 570 |
| Very high | 17 | (15.32) | 70 | (63.06) | 24 | (21.62) | 111 |
| Career commitment n (%), | |||||||
| Very low | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Low | 3 | (8.33) | 28 | (77.78) | 5 | (13.89) | 36 |
| High | 107 | (19.42) | 340 | (61.71) | 104 | (18.87) | 551 |
| Very high | 22 | (19.13) | 69 | (60.00) | 24 | (20.87) | 115 |
| Social support n (%), | |||||||
| Very low | 9 | (28.13) | 18 | (56.25) | 5 | (15.63) | 32 |
| Low | 60 | (17.70) | 214 | (63.13) | 65 | (19.17) | 339 |
| High | 63 | (19.50) | 199 | (61.61) | 61 | (18.89) | 323 |
| Very high | 6 | (22.22) | 15 | (55.56) | 6 | (22.22) | 27 |
| Work stress n (%), | |||||||
| No stress (0 ~ 59) | 31 | (11.44) | 157 | (57.93) | 83 | (30.63) | 271 |
| Low (60–70) | 28 | (24.78) | 67 | (59.29) | 18 | (15.93) | 113 |
| Medium (71–81) | 20 | (16.81) | 83 | (69.75) | 16 | (13.45) | 119 |
| High (82–92) | 14 | (17.07) | 58 | (70.73) | 10 | (12.20) | 82 |
| Very high (93–200) | 45 | (33.09) | 82 | (60.29) | 9 | (6.62) | 136 |
aLikelihood ratio of the chi-square value
Multiple factor logistic regression of hierarchical impact factors
| Characteristic | Turnover intention (weak) | Turnover intention (strong) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted OR | 95% CI |
| Adjusted OR | 95% CI |
| |||
| Age group | ||||||||
| 20–24 | Ref | Ref | ||||||
| 25–29 | 0.674 | 0.407 | 1.116 | 0.0007 | 0.879 | 0.442 | 1.749 | <.0001 |
| 30–39 | 1.165 | 0.793 | 1.712 | 0.9662 | 0.895 | 0.456 | 1.759 | 0.6976 |
| ≥ 40 | 2.253 | 1.026 | 4.950 | 0.0307 | 1.119 | 0.314 | 3.986 | 0.8191 |
| Job duty | ||||||||
| Nurse | Ref | Ref | ||||||
| Teaching nurse | 0.636 | 0.407 | 0.995 | 0.5363 | 0.638 | 0.466 | 0.874 | 0.0334 |
| Team leader | 0.395 | 0.237 | 0.659 | 0.0016 | 1.128 | 0.327 | 3.890 | 0.9863 |
| Head nurse | 1.348 | 0.740 | 2.455 | 0.0118 | 2.189 | 1.137 | 4.211 | <.0001 |
| Career commitment | ||||||||
| Low | Ref | Ref | ||||||
| Very high | 1.148 | 0.912 | 1.445 | <.0001 | 1.185 | 0.919 | 1.528 | <.0001 |
| High | 0.435 | 0.273 | 0.693 | <.0001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <.0001 |
| Psychological stress scale | 1.026 | 1.012 | 1.041 | 0.0004 | 1.035 | 1.018 | 1.052 | <.0001 |
Mutiple linear regression ananlysis of 30–39 age subgroup
| Variable | β | t |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional title | |||
| Nurse-in-chief | Ref | ||
| Resident nurse | 1.096 | 0.451 | 0.653 |
| Nurse | 0.826 | 0.353 | 0.724 |
| Fellow | 0.797 | 0.341 | 0.733 |
| Job responsibility | |||
| Head nurse | Ref | ||
| Nurse | −0.412 | −0.567 | 0.571 |
| Teaching nurse | 0.621 | 0.831 | 0.407 |
| Team leader | 1.838 | 2.179 | 0.031 |
| Hospital level | |||
| Tertiary | Ref | ||
| Secondary | 3.029 | 3.781 | <0.0001 |