Literature DB >> 34475792

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Future Nursing Career Turnover Intention Among Nursing Students.

Yulan Lin1, Zhijian Hu1, Mahmoud Danaee2, Haridah Alias2, Li Ping Wong1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A shortage of nurses has been a major global concern, particularly during pandemics. Nursing students turning away from the nursing profession upon graduation may exacerbate nursing workforce shortfalls. The main objective of this study was to assess perceived occupational turnover intention among nursing students and associated factors (fear of COVID-19 and life satisfaction). Students were also asked to provide suggestions that could enhance their intention to join the nursing profession.
METHODS: An online survey was sent to all registered undergraduate nursing students at Fujian Medical University, China. The partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM) was used to investigate key factors influencing turnover intention.
RESULTS: A total of 1020 complete responses were received (response rate: 86.2%). Nearly half (49.1%) reported that they would choose not to be on a nursing course if given a choice, 45.4% often think of not going into the nursing profession in the future, and 23.7% would consider entering a healthcare industry that has zero contact with patients. The total turnover intention score range was 3 to 15, and the mean ± standard deviation (SD) was 9.2 (SD ± 2.5). PLS-SEM path analysis revealed that fear of COVID-19 (β = 0.226, p < 0.001) had a positive effect on turnover intention. Satisfaction with life (β = -0.212, p < 0.001) had a negative effect on turnover intention. Analysis of open-ended survey data on students' perspectives on how to encourage nursing students to enter the nursing workforce revealed five central themes: 1) professional role, respect, and recognition; 2) higher wages; 3) reduce workload; 4) enhance occupational health and safety; and 5) career advancement opportunities.
CONCLUSION: Factors influencing turnover intention and suggestions to reduce students' apprehension towards joining the nursing profession found in this study should be seriously taken into consideration in initiatives to address the nurse shortages.
© 2021 Lin et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chinese nursing students; fear of COVID-19; life satisfaction; psychological reactions; turnover intention

Year:  2021        PMID: 34475792      PMCID: PMC8407786          DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S322764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1179-1594


Introduction

The issues of nursing staff shortages and turnover are human resource problems affecting many European and Asian countries having a huge impact on the performance of the national healthcare systems of those countries.1,2 Continued nurse shortages hinder the delivery of high-quality patient care and have a detrimental impact on patient outcomes and mortality.3,4 The nursing shortage situation in China constitutes a considerable concern.5 In China, the shortage of nurses has increased the workload, stress, and burnout of the remaining nurses.6 Nurse turnover is a serious problem that has been the subject of intensive research in China.7 High annual turnover rates range from 20% to 45% of hospital nursing care workers in China has been reported.8 More recently, a systematic review reported a high prevalence of depressive symptoms among Chinese nurses, with an increasing trend associated with a shortage of nursing resources resulting in heavy workloads.9 Apart from a heavy workload, well-being and life satisfaction are also important influencing factors affecting nurses’ decision to stay in the nursing profession.10 Life satisfaction is a general assessment of emotions and attitudes about an individual’s life at a certain point.11 Greater life satisfaction is associated with greater career satisfaction, motivation, and commitment.12 Well-being in healthcare workers and undergraduate students has been found to have a positive relationship with optimism, resilience in facing challenges, and a stronger belief in one’s ability to handle stress.13 The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic first broke out in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. It is now a major public health emergency worldwide, because it has spread quickly and caused extensive infections. As of 28 March 2021, over 126 million SARS-CoV-2 cases and 2.7 million deaths have been reported by the World Health Organization (WHO).14 According to the WHO, as of July 2020, over 1.4 million infections of COVID-19 have been reported among healthcare workers, which accounts for 10% of global infections.15 During an infectious disease pandemic, healthcare workers are every country’s most valued resource. As nurses constitute the majority of healthcare workers, they have a tremendously important function in healthcare systems during outbreaks of acute infectious diseases. The impact of COVID-19 on the nursing workforce has been pronounced across the world and the pandemic has exacerbated the already critical shortage of nursing staff.16 Most importantly, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an enhanced nursing workload,17 resulting in nurses suffering burnout or psychological distress.18 Furthermore, nurses face a substantial risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection because they are on the frontline in the fight against COVID-19. A high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported among healthcare workers from the UK and the Netherlands.19 In China, as of 26 March 2020, out of 50,006 COVID-19 cases in Wuhan, 2457 (nearly 5%) were healthcare workers, of whom 17 died.20 Of note, half of the infected healthcare workers were nurses.20 A recent study reported that the COVID-19 pandemic has instilled tremendous fear among frontline nurses in China, and nursing students who will soon become nurses have similarly expressed heightened anxiety.21 As the need for nurses continues to increase with the world facing the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing students are an important future nursing workforce. An increasing loss of Chinese nurses after graduation was reported in China prior to the pandemic.22 Hence, it is important that nursing students enter the workforce to fill the serious nursing workforce shortage. Much research has been conducted into the turnover intention of nurses in the workforce, but little is known about the turnover intentions and career orientations of nursing students after the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Therefore, this study aimed to determine perceived occupational turnover intention among nursing students. The existing literature indicates that fear of COVID-19 and life satisfaction are important influences of career turnover intention. Hence, factors influencing turnover intention, namely fear of COVID-19 and life satisfaction, were also studied. In this study we hypothesized that higher levels of fear of the COVID-19 pandemic and lower levels of life satisfaction may result in higher turnover intention among nursing students. It is also important to gather opinions from nursing students about other external factors that influence turnover intention. Therefore, the second objective of this study was to capture students’ opinions on these factors to obtain a greater understanding of the barriers or facilitators influencing their intention to join the nursing profession. The findings of this study may contribute to the understanding of nursing students’ career intentions in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic and provide useful insights for nursing programmes or government authorities to prevent depletion of the nursing workforce.

Method

Study Participants

The participants were all undergraduate nursing students enrolled in Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China. The survey was administered online. A convenience sampling method was used for the data collection. The link to the online self-report questionnaire was sent to all registered nursing students. Data collection was conducted between 24 September 2020 and 10 October 2020. In the current study, the estimated sample size was derived from the online Raosoft sample size calculator.23 The sample size was calculated based on a response rate of 50%, a confidence interval of 99%, a margin of error of 5%, and a total of the university nursing student population of 1183. Accordingly, the total sample size required for the study was calculated to be 426. The sample size was multiplied by the predicted design effect of two to account for the use of convenience sampling and an online survey.24 Hence, the minimum survey sample size was set to 852 (426 × 2) participants.

Measures

Fear of COVID-19 Scale

The fear of COVID-19 scale assessed the students’ psychological reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic. They were asked about their level of fear in relation to being in a nursing career during the COVID-19 pandemic. To date, there is no established measurement for assessing fear of COVID-19 in nurses or other healthcare workers, hence the questionnaire used was self-developed. A five-item unidimensional scale was answered by nursing students using a 4-point Likert scale which ranged from 0 (not at all afraid) to 3 (very afraid). The composite score ranged from 0 to 15, with a higher score indicating a greater fear of COVID-19.

Satisfaction with Life Scale

Students’ satisfaction with their current life was measured using the five-item Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS).25 Students answered each item on the scale using a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The summation of complete item responses yielded a total raw score ranging from 5 to 35. The scores were classified as extremely satisfied (31–35), satisfied (26–30), slightly satisfied (21–25), neutral (20), slightly dissatisfied (15–19), dissatisfied (10–14), and extremely dissatisfied (5–9).25 The mean Cronbach’s alpha of the SWLS across various samples was 0.78 with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) ranging from 0.766 to 0.807.26

Turnover Intention Scale

Perceived turnover intention was measured using a modified version of the turnover intention assessment scale by Camman, Fichman, Jenkins and Klesh (1979),27 using a three-item scale with a five-point Likert format ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranged from 3 to 15, with a higher score indicating greater turnover intention. Turnover intention was assessed by the item “I often think of not going into the nursing profession in the future”, “It is very possible that I will look for a career in the healthcare industry that has zero contact with patients in the future”, and “If I could choose again, I would choose not to be in the nursing course”. The last question in this survey was an open-ended question, to which the students responded in their own words with suggestions to alleviate students’ apprehension about joining the nursing profession.

Data Analysis

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the demographic factors influencing fear of COVID-19 and satisfaction with life. In the multivariable logistic regression analyses, all variables found to have a statistically significant association (two-tailed, p< 0.05) in the univariate analyses were entered into the model via the forced-entry method.28 Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and p-values were calculated for each independent variable. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to measure the model fit.29 Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to quantify the contributing factors (socio-demographics, fear of COVID-19, and satisfaction with life) of turnover intention. As the students’ age and grade are equivalent assessments, only the students’ age was included in the model. A bootstrapping approach was used to evaluate the significance of the associations in the proposed model. This technique assesses not only the reliability of the dataset but also the statistical significance of the coefficients and the error of the estimated path coefficients.30 The bootstrapped significance calculation was conducted using SmartPLS version 3.2.8 (SmartPLS GmbH).31 In the model, turnover intention, fear of COVID-19, and satisfaction with life were considered as reflective constructs and all other independent variables were a single-item construct. Prior to running the path model, the convergent and discriminant validity of all the measurements were assessed. To assess reliability, we utilized internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (α) with composite reliability (CR). Discriminant validity was evaluated using the heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio. The qualitative data generated by open-ended questions were analysed using deductive qualitative content analysis.32,33

Results

A total of 1020 out of a total sample of 1183 nursing registered nursing students completed the survey between 24 September 2020 and 10 October 2020, producing a response rate of 86.2%. The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 19.9 (±1.5) years. The majority of the participants were female (85.5%), originated from rural areas (69.1%) and had an average monthly family income of CNY4000-9999. The complete details of students’ characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Characteristics of the Study Population and Factors Associated with Fear of COVID-19 and Satisfaction with Life (N=1020)

Fear of COVID-19Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
Univariable AnalysisMultivariable AnalysisUnivariable AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
N (%)Score 7–15 (n=510)p-valueOR (95% CI)a Score 7–15 vs 0–6Satisfied (n=466)p-valueOR (95% CI)b Satisfied vs Dissatisfied
Demographic characteristics
Age
 16–19405 (39.7)172 (42.5)Reference219 (54.1)1.55 (1.03–2.32)*
 20–21478 (46.9)265 (55.4)p<0.0011.13 (0.76–1.68)193 (40.4)p<0.0010.95 (0.64–1.41)
 22–23137 (13.4)73 (53.3)1.01 (0.58–1.74)54 (39.4)Reference
Gender
 Male148 (14.5)57 (38.5)Reference74 (50.0)0.284
 Female872 (85.5)453 (51.9)0.0031.59 (1.10–2.28)*392 (45.0)
Ethnicity
 Han908 (89.0)453 (49.9)420 (46.3)0.316
 Others112 (11.0)57 (50.9)0.92046 (41.1)
Location
 Urban315 (30.9)140 (44.4)Reference166 (52.7)0.0031.33 (1.00–1.76)*
 Rural705 (69.1)370 (52.5)0.0211.40 (1.06–1.84)*300 (42.6)Reference
Study grade
 Grade 1192 (18.8)73 (38.0)Reference97 (50.5)
 Grade 2274 (26.9)123 (44.9)p<0.0011.28 (0.87–1.89)137 (50.0)0.064
 Grade 3262 (25.7)156 (59.5)2.13 (1.30–3.49)**112 (42.7)
 Grade 4292 (28.6)158 (54.1)1.74 (1.02–2.95)*120 (41.1)
Average monthly family income (CNY)
 <4000415 (39.3)220 (53.0)147 (35.4)Reference
 4000–9999450 (44.1)216 (48.0)0.381229 (50.9)p<0.0011.74 (1.32–2.30)***
 10,000 and above155 (15.2)74 (47.7090 (58.1)2.13 (1.44–3.16)***

Notes: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. aHosmer–Lemeshow test, chi-square: 2.666, p-value: 0.954; Nagelkerke R2: 0.049. bHosmer–Lemeshow test, chi-square: 6.819, p-value: 0.338; Nagelkerke R2: 0.063. †Responses for extremely satisfied/satisfied/slightly satisfied/neutral. ‡Responses for slightly dissatisfied/dissatisfied/extremely dissatisfied.

Characteristics of the Study Population and Factors Associated with Fear of COVID-19 and Satisfaction with Life (N=1020) Notes: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. aHosmer–Lemeshow test, chi-square: 2.666, p-value: 0.954; Nagelkerke R2: 0.049. bHosmer–Lemeshow test, chi-square: 6.819, p-value: 0.338; Nagelkerke R2: 0.063. †Responses for extremely satisfied/satisfied/slightly satisfied/neutral. ‡Responses for slightly dissatisfied/dissatisfied/extremely dissatisfied. Figure 1 shows the responses for fear of being in nursing career during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nearly 70% reported being very afraid/moderately afraid of infecting family members, followed by fear of losing life. The mean (±SD) for the total physical prevention barriers score was 6.3 (±3.1). The median was 6.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 5.0 to 9.0). The mean fear scores were categorised as a score of 7–15 or 0–6, based on the median split; as such, a total of 510 (50.0%; 95% CI: 46.9 to 53.1) were categorised as having a score of 7–10. As shown in Table 1, those of an older age, females, those originating from rural areas, and those with higher grades reported a higher fear of COVID-19. Finding from the multivariate analysis revealed that students from grade 3 (OR=2.13, 95% CI: 1.30–3.49) and grade 4 (OR=1.72, 95% CI: 1.02–2.95) reported a higher fear than did those from grade 1. Female students reported higher fear scores than males (OR=1.59, 95% CI: 1.10–2.28), and participants originating from rural areas reported higher fear scores than those from urban areas (OR=1.40, 95% CI: 1.06–1.84).
Figure 1

Proportion of “very afraid/moderately afraid” responses for fear of COVID-19 items (N=1020).

Proportion of “very afraid/moderately afraid” responses for fear of COVID-19 items (N=1020). As shown in Figure 2, nearly two-thirds (62.4%) responded “strongly agree/agree/slightly agree/neutral” concerning their level of satisfaction with their lives at the current moment and slightly over half (55.3%) said that their life was close to their ideal. Overall, the proportion of “strongly agree/agree/slightly agree/neutral” responses was very low for all the five SWLS items. The highest proportion (29.7%) was for the slightly dissatisfied group (score 15–19), followed by 26.4% for slightly satisfied (score 21–25). The mean (±SD) for the SWLS was 18.7 (±5.9). The median was 19 (IQR: 15.0 to 23.0). As shown in Table 1, significantly higher satisfaction with life scores were reported among younger age participants and those living in urban areas. In the multivariable analysis, average family income was the strongest predictor of higher SWLS. Participants with an average family monthly income of CNY 10,000 and above had a 2.13 higher odds (95% CI: 1.44–3.16) of higher SWLS than those with an income below CNY4000. Participants aged 16–19 years old reported 1.55 higher odds (95% CI: 1.03–2.32) of higher SWLS than those aged 22–23 years. Participants residing in urban areas also reported 1.33 higher odds (95% CI: 1.00–1.76) of SWLS than those in rural areas.
Figure 2

Proportion of “strongly agree/agree/slightly agree/neutral” responses for satisfaction items and total satisfaction with life score (N=1020).

Proportion of “strongly agree/agree/slightly agree/neutral” responses for satisfaction items and total satisfaction with life score (N=1020). The proportion of responses to turnover intention is shown in Figure 3. The vast majority responded “extremely agree/slightly agree” that they would choose not to be on the nursing course if given a choice (49.1%), often think of not going into the nursing profession in the future (45.4%), and are considering the possibility of venturing into a healthcare industry that has zero contact with patients (23.7%). The mean (±SD) for the turnover score was 9.2 (±2.5). The median was 9 (IQR: 8.0 to 11.0).
Figure 3

Proportion of responses of “extremely agree/slightly agree” responses for turnover items (N=1020).

Proportion of responses of “extremely agree/slightly agree” responses for turnover items (N=1020). Table 2 shows the convergent validity and reliability of the constructs. The results of the measurement model indicated that all indicators had an acceptable outer loading (above 0.5), with a CR value over 0.7 and average variance extracted (AVE) above 0.5. The variance inflation factors (VIFs) for all indicators were below 2.5, implying that all indicators belonging to these three constructs were adequately independent. The results of the discriminant validity analysis using the HTMT ratio of correlations method also showed that all HTMT values were lower than the most restrictive threshold (0.85) proposed by Kline (2011),34 implying adequate discriminant validity. The hypothesised associations between demographics, fear of COVID-19, satisfaction with life, and turnover intention are shown in Figure 4. The model showed that fear of COVID-19 (β=0.226, p<0.001) had a positive effect on turnover intention. Satisfaction with life (β=−0.212, p<0.001) had a negative effect on turnover intention. The results for adjusted R2 indicated that this model explained 10.1% of the total variance in turnover intention.
Table 2

Convergent Validity and Reliability of Constructs

ConstructItemLoadingCronbach’s AlphaComposite Reliability (CR)Average Variance Extracted (AVE)
Fear of COVID-19Fear 10.8570.8280.8730.587
Fear 20.873
Fear 30.743
Fear 40.502
Fear 50.797
Satisfaction with lifeSatis10.8100.8620.8960.632
Satis20.716
Satis30.839
Satis30.793
Satis50.813
Turnover intentionTurnover10.8470.6970.8330.625
Turnover20.708
Turnover30.810
Figure 4

Partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM) of factors influencing turnover intention.

Convergent Validity and Reliability of Constructs Partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM) of factors influencing turnover intention. In the last section of the survey, 71 responses to the open-ended questions were received. Analysis of the open-ended survey data revealed five central themes in the responses: 1) professional role, respect, and recognition; 2) higher wages; 3) reduced workload; 4) enhanced occupational health, and safety; and 5) career advancement opportunities. Selected quotes from the participants are shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Five Central Themes and Respective Illustrative Quotes

ThemesQuotes
Professional role, respect, and recognitionSocial status of nurses is low, we do not get the respect we deserve, low salary, and bad treatment at work.Should improve social status and social identity of nurses.Improve social status and patients’ respect for nurses.Improve the public’s respect for the nurse.Improve and providing fair treatment to nurses.
Higher wagesPolicy or strategies to protect nurses’ basic rights, such as increase income and rest timeIncrease the salary
Reduce workloadReduce night-shift time, reduce workload.Career satisfaction and nurses’ welfare.
Enhance occupational health and safetyEnhance strategies to protect nurses’ basic rights, such as safety.Pay more attention to nurses’ personal protection and safety issues.The hospital needs to prepare enough personnel and protective equipment
Career advancement opportunitiesI hope the government could pay attention to nursing career development, to secure nurses’ career happiness.Improve nurses’ career development, provide more opportunities
Five Central Themes and Respective Illustrative Quotes

Discussion

The COVID-19 pandemic has signified the importance of an adequate nursing workforce in the healthcare system during an infectious disease crisis. This study investigated perceived turnover intention among nursing students to identify potential shortages of the nursing workforce and to enable planning strategies to alleviate the nurse turnover rate. This study investigated psychological reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic and life satisfaction, which are two important components that can affect career retention and turnover intention. In this study, the median score for fear of COVID-19 near the midpoint implies that the nursing students who participated in the study had a moderate level of fear about being in a nursing career during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nursing students in this study expressed heightened fear of the risk of infecting family members and fear of death, which was similarly reported in a recent survey of frontline nurses in China. The high susceptibility, severity, and fatality of COVID-19 intensified anxiety and fear in most frontline nurses in Wuhan, China; many reported facing enormous mental turmoil.18 In our study, nursing students of an older age and with higher grades exhibited a higher level of fear of COVID-19. Like prior studies,35,36 this study found that females demonstrated lower psychological resilience than males. It is important to note that male participants were under-represented in this study; therefore further studies are needed to confirm the gender disparities in psychological resilience. With regard to life satisfaction, the current study showed that the overall level of nursing students’ satisfaction with life was moderate. Nursing students from urban residences have higher life satisfaction than those from rural areas. A decline in satisfaction along with an increase in age was observed, and life satisfaction increased with an increase in family income. Our findings of the association between demographic, socio-economic, and life satisfaction using the SWLS of this study were similar to findings reported in college students and adults populations.37–41 In this study, nearly half reported that they would not choose to be on the nursing course and thought of not going into the nursing profession in the future. Furthermore, based on a score range of 3–15, and a median score of 9, the findings imply that the nursing students who participated in this study scored an average turnover intention. As such, the findings may imply a potential loss of approximately half of nursing students entering the workforce. Additionally, this study indicate the possibility of nursing students leaving the nursing programme before their residency to pursue other options. Considering the current shortage of nursing staff in China, our findings indicate that the country may be on the verge of a critical nursing shortage in the coming years. Recruitment and retention strategies are urgently required to prevent this shortage from reaching a crisis point for healthcare services. The results of the PLS-SEM analysis shed light on the importance of psychological reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic and life satisfaction in turnover intention. Our study found that a higher level of fear of COVID-19 was strongly associated with nursing students’ perceived occupational turnover intention. Likewise, a recent study performed in another Asian country reported that fear of COVID-19 had a significant positive influence on professional turnover intention in nurses.35 Therefore, addressing the fear of COVID-19 may enhance the intention of students to join the nursing workforce in the future. Improvements in institutional mental health support for nursing students to address their fear of COVID-19, such as provision of counselling and accurate information about COVID-19, are essential to reduce fear. It is expected that poor life satisfaction will result in high turnover intention, as shown in previous findings on nurses.42,43 The use of an open-ended question encouraging nursing students to enter the nursing profession was conducive to uncovering useful insights from our study participants. Firstly, the responses indicated the need to improve recognition and respect from society and within the organisation, as reported in other studies.44,45 In China, a lack of respect and recognition for nurses’ work from patients and their families, as well as the organisation, has been reported to influence nurses’ intentions to leave their profession.46 These findings imply that it is essential to enhance inter-professional respect between nurses and other health professionals in medical practice settings. Occupational violence against nurses from patients and their relatives should be prevented. There is also a need to improve the understanding of society about the prestige of the nursing profession to increase the respect for and visibility of nurses in society. Responses from our study participants should also encourage the government authorities to look into the heavy workload of nurses, long working hours, and low salaries of nurses, which are also common challenges surrounding the nursing profession worldwide.47 Our study participants also called for the safeguarding of nurses from workplace-induced injuries and illnesses. Particularly in the age of COVID-19, high COVID-19 infection rates and lives lost among nurses in China warrant effective measures from the authorities to protect healthcare workers. During the early phase of the pandemic, a high risk of infection was reported for healthcare workers in China due to a shortage of personal protective equipment.48 Lastly, the current lack of career advancement opportunities among nurses in China warrants serious attention. Opportunities for career development have been found to be a factor in nurse retention in the workforce in many countries around the world,49 as well as in a study conducted in China.50 Therefore, the provision of a good career orientation with many opportunities for professional growth is needed.

Limitations

The findings of this study should be interpreted cautiously owing to some limitations. First, the use of a cross-sectional study design precluded the evaluation of the causality among the relationships investigated in this study. Second, self-reported data were subject to socially desirable responses. Third, the occupational turnover intention does not necessarily result in actual intention. The last limitation in the sampling method, which involved recruiting participants from only one medical school in the Fujian province. The findings of this study may not be generalisable to the nursing student population in China as a whole. Despite these limitations, the sample was large, with diverse demographic backgrounds, and the study had the advantage of a high response rate. Furthermore, our results are much in accordance with many similar studies on turnover intention in nursing careers conducted in China, as well as across the globe.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic is anticipated to exacerbate the decline in nursing students entering the nursing profession. A considerable proportion may turn away from the nursing profession upon graduation, and institutions may also be at risk of students quitting the nursing programme. The nursing workforce may continue to face shortages due to the low number of nursing graduates to replenish the workforce. Existing nurses may be likely to continue experiencing burnout and dissatisfaction, potentially leading to reduced patient care resulting in higher patient mortality. An important highlight of this study is the significant influence of fear of COVID-19 and life satisfaction on nursing students’ turnover intention. As nursing students are an important source of the future nursing workforce, addressing their fears and well-being before they graduate should be a priority. Life satisfaction and psychological reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic influenced nursing students’ perceived turnover intention in this study and can guide higher education institutions to carefully attend to groups of students vulnerable to turnover intention. Tackling turnover intention in the academic institutions would encourage nursing students to join the nursing profession in the future. Psychological approaches to mental illness, interventions relating to COVID-19 and career motivational talks at the institutional level are highly recommended to rejuvenate and sustain the nursing workforce.
  29 in total

1.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Potential of China in global nurse migration.

Authors:  Zhiwu Zack Fang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Impact of nursing unit turnover on patient outcomes in hospitals.

Authors:  Sung-Heui Bae; Barbara Mark; Bruce Fried
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.176

4.  The relationship between job satisfaction and turnover intention among nurses in Axum comprehensive and specialized hospital Tigray, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Dawit Gebregziabher; Eskedar Berhanie; Hagos Berihu; Addis Belstie; Girmay Teklay
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2020-08-18

5.  Prevalence of depressive symptoms among nurses in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nanzhen Xie; Yan Qin; Taiwu Wang; Ying Zeng; Xia Deng; Li Guan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  What is behind high turnover: a questionnaire survey of hospital nursing care workers in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Huiyun Yuan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Nurse turnover and perceived causes and consequences: a preliminary study at private hospitals in Indonesia.

Authors:  Aryo Dewanto; Viera Wardhani
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2018-12-19

8.  Nursing shortage in China: State, causes, and strategy.

Authors:  Hu Yun; Shen Jie; Jiang Anli
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.250

9.  The Relationship Between Work Environment Satisfaction and Retention Intention Among Nursing Administrators in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chiou-Fen Lin; Chung-I Huang; Che-Ming Yang; Meei-Shiow Lu
Journal:  J Nurs Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.682

10.  Emotional responses and coping strategies in nurses and nursing students during Covid-19 outbreak: A comparative study.

Authors:  Long Huang; Wansheng Lei; Fuming Xu; Hairong Liu; Liang Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Resilience, Occupational Stress, Job Satisfaction, and Intention to Leave the Organization among Nurses and Midwives during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Andrzej Piotrowski; Ewa Sygit-Kowalkowska; Ole Boe; Samir Rawat
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Female Sex and Living in a Large City Moderate the Relationships between Nursing Students' Stress Level, Perception of Their Studies, and Intention to Practice Professionally: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Natalia Dominika Pawlak; Lena Serafin; Bożena Czarkowska-Pączek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Perceived Social Support Promotes Nursing Students' Psychological Wellbeing: Explained With Self-Compassion and Professional Self-Concept.

Authors:  Lu Zhou; Khunanan Sukpasjaroen; Yuming Wu; Liu Gao; Thitinan Chankoson; Enli Cai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-05

4.  Frontline Nurses' Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Associated Predictive Factors During the Second Wave of COVID-19 in Central, Uganda.

Authors:  Amir Kabunga; Ponsiano Okalo
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 2.570

5.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Psychosocial Burden and Job Satisfaction of Long-Term Care Nurses in Poland.

Authors:  Katarzyna Tomaszewska; Bożena Majchrowicz; Marek Delong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.