| Literature DB >> 28155726 |
Boyan Mao1, Wenxin Wang1, Zhou Zhao2, Xi Zhao1, Lanlan Li1, Huixia Zhang1, Youjun Liu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the ratio of powers of the fundamental frequency and its first harmonic (F0/H1) in fast Fourier transformation (FFT) analysis of the graft's flow waves has been used in the field of evaluation of the patency in anastomosis. But there is no report about using the FFT method to evaluate the magnitude of competitive flow. This study is aiming at exploring the relationship between competitive flow and FFT analysis of the flow waves in left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft, and finding a new method to evaluate the magnitude of competitive flow.Entities:
Keywords: CABG; Competitive flow; FFT
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28155726 PMCID: PMC5259820 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0260-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
The nodes and elements numbers of the 3D models
| Model (%) | Nodes | Elements |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | 1,109,466 | 1,450,211 |
| 90 | 1,103,681 | 1,414,879 |
| 75 | 1,081,759 | 1,366,195 |
| 60 | 1,039,353 | 1,334,604 |
| 50 | 1,025,067 | 1,313,895 |
| 40 | 1,013,483 | 1,304,175 |
Fig. 1The CABG multiscale model. We construct six models which are similar except for stenosis ratio
The values of parameters in 0D model
| Heart block | Rla | Rlv | Lla | Laa | Caa |
| 0.00375 | 0.0075 | 0.00285 | 0.0037 | 0.95 | |
| Systemic block | Rp | Rd | C | ||
| A | 0.17 | 1.517 | 2.2653 | ||
| B | 1.311 | 9.565 | 0.159 | ||
| C | 1.312 | 9.201 | 0.1588 | ||
| D | 1.059 | 9.725 | 0.09239 | ||
| E | 1.117 | 9.325 | 0.09233 | ||
| Coronary block | R | Rm | Rv | C | Cim |
| a | 14.258 | 129.513 | 45.254 | 0.00124 | 0.01269 |
| b | 20.254 | 135.505 | 44.002 | 0.00137 | 0.00909 |
| c | 20.254 | 135.505 | 44.002 | 0.00137 | 0.00909 |
| d | 46.753 | 110.004 | 18.751 | 0.00101 | 0.0354 |
| e | 46.753 | 110.004 | 18.751 | 0.00101 | 0.0354 |
| f | 46.753 | 110.004 | 18.751 | 0.00101 | 0.0354 |
| g | 127.51 | 207.767 | 65.255 | 0.00049 | 0.00956 |
| h | 46.009 | 156.766 | 48.505 | 0.00064 | 0.01941 |
| i | 150.013 | 264.771 | 83.256 | 0.0001 | 0.00927 |
| j | 120.613 | 211.271 | 66.456 | 0.00021 | 0.01427 |
| k | 150.013 | 264.771 | 83.256 | 0.0001 | 0.00927 |
| l | 13.601 | 155.516 | 44.505 | 0.00109 | 0.0092 |
| m | 18.601 | 145.516 | 44.505 | 0.00109 | 0.0092 |
| n | 16.516 | 136.276 | 42.008 | 0.0011 | 0.01365 |
The comparison between model predictions and clinical data
| Model predictions | Clinical data | |
|---|---|---|
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 147.69 | 147 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 103.48 | 103 |
| Cardiac output (l/min) | 4.58 | 4.6 |
Fig. 2The first picture is the LIMA flow waves from a patient who underwent LIMA-LAD bypass grafting; the second one is the spectrogram of the FFT analysis
Fig. 3The LIMA flow waves of different stenosis (take one cycle)
The LIMA flow, the stenosis LAD flow and LAD/LIMA ratio
| Model (%) | LIMA flow (ml/min) | Stenosis LAD flow (ml/min) | LAD/LIMA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 79.2 | 0 | 0 |
| 90 | 77.3 | 2.44 | 0.03 |
| 75 | 62.3 | 17.4 | 0.28 |
| 60 | 50.1 | 29.8 | 0.59 |
| 50 | 38.5 | 41.7 | 1.08 |
| 40 | 32.5 | 47.9 | 1.47 |
Fig. 4The left is the LIMA flow waves of different stenosis, the right is the corresponding FFT results
Recording of FFT results
| (%) | F0 | H1 | H2 | H3 | F0/H1 | F0/H2 | F0/H3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 18,920 | 16,130 | 17,380 | 4054 | 1.17 | 1.09 | 4.67 |
| 90 | 18,810 | 14,510 | 16,160 | 3827 | 1.3 | 1.16 | 4.92 |
| 75 | 20,850 | 2464 | 9019 | 3490 | 8.46 | 2.31 | 5.97 |
| 60 | 26,120 | 6043 | 5031 | 3087 | 4.32 | 5.19 | 8.2 |
| 50 | 29,220 | 12,270 | 1980 | 2704 | 2.38 | 14.76 | 10.81 |
| 40 | 31,730 | 15,290 | 1449 | 2502 | 2.08 | 21.9 | 12.68 |
Fig. 5The stenosis-varying line chart of FFT ratio