Francesco Guido Mangano1,2, Giovanna Iezzi3, Jamil Awad Shibli4, Jefferson Trabach Pires4, Giuseppe Luongo5, Adriano Piattelli3, Carlo Mangano6. 1. Department of Surgical and Morphological Science, Dental School, University of Varese, 21100, Varese, Italy. francescoguidomangano@gmail.com. 2. , Piazza Trento 4, 22015, Gravedona, Como, Italy. francescoguidomangano@gmail.com. 3. Department of Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy. 4. Department of Periodontology, Oral Implantology Clinic, Dental Research Division, Guarulhos University, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 5. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Naples, Naples, Italy. 6. Department of Dental Sciences, University Vita Salute S. Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized, controlled histologic/histomorphometric study was to compare the early bone formation around immediately loaded implants with nanostructured calcium-incorporated (NCI) and machined (MA) surface, placed in the human posterior maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Fifteen fully edentulous patients (six males; nine females; mean age 57.9 ± 6.7 years) were selected for this study. Each patient was installed with two temporary transmucosal implants, with different surfaces: one NCI (test) and one MA (control) implant. All temporary implants were placed in the posterior maxilla, according to a split-mouth design, to help to support an interim complete maxillary denture. After 8 weeks, all temporary transmucosal implants were retrieved for histologic/histomorphometric evaluation. The bone-to-implant contact (BIC%) and the bone density (BD%) were calculated. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to evaluate differences (BIC%, BD%) between the surfaces. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Eight weeks after placement, 24 clinically stable implants (12 test, 12 control) were subjected to histologic/histomorphometric evaluation. In the MA implants, the histomorphometric evaluation revealed a mean BIC(±SD)% and BD(±SD)% of 21.2(±4.9)% and 29.8(±7.8)%, respectively. In the NCI implants, the histomorphometric analysis revealed a mean BIC(±SD)% and BD(±SD)% of 39.7(±8.7)% and 34.6(±7.2)%, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the two surfaces with regard to BIC% (p < 0.001), while no significant difference was found with regard to BD% (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The NCI surface seems to increase the peri-implant endosseous healing properties in the native bone of the posterior maxilla, under immediate loading conditions, when compared with the MA surface. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Under immediate loading conditions in the human posterior maxilla, the nanostructured calcium-incorporated surface has led to better histologic and histomorphometric results than the machined surface; therefore, the clinical use of implants with nanostructured calcium-incorporated surface may be beneficial in the posterior maxilla, under immediate loading protocol.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized, controlled histologic/histomorphometric study was to compare the early bone formation around immediately loaded implants with nanostructured calcium-incorporated (NCI) and machined (MA) surface, placed in the human posterior maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen fully edentulouspatients (six males; nine females; mean age 57.9 ± 6.7 years) were selected for this study. Each patient was installed with two temporary transmucosal implants, with different surfaces: one NCI (test) and one MA (control) implant. All temporary implants were placed in the posterior maxilla, according to a split-mouth design, to help to support an interim complete maxillary denture. After 8 weeks, all temporary transmucosal implants were retrieved for histologic/histomorphometric evaluation. The bone-to-implant contact (BIC%) and the bone density (BD%) were calculated. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to evaluate differences (BIC%, BD%) between the surfaces. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Eight weeks after placement, 24 clinically stable implants (12 test, 12 control) were subjected to histologic/histomorphometric evaluation. In the MA implants, the histomorphometric evaluation revealed a mean BIC(±SD)% and BD(±SD)% of 21.2(±4.9)% and 29.8(±7.8)%, respectively. In the NCI implants, the histomorphometric analysis revealed a mean BIC(±SD)% and BD(±SD)% of 39.7(±8.7)% and 34.6(±7.2)%, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the two surfaces with regard to BIC% (p < 0.001), while no significant difference was found with regard to BD% (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The NCI surface seems to increase the peri-implant endosseous healing properties in the native bone of the posterior maxilla, under immediate loading conditions, when compared with the MA surface. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Under immediate loading conditions in the human posterior maxilla, the nanostructured calcium-incorporated surface has led to better histologic and histomorphometric results than the machined surface; therefore, the clinical use of implants with nanostructured calcium-incorporated surface may be beneficial in the posterior maxilla, under immediate loading protocol.
Entities:
Keywords:
Early bone formation; Human histology; Immediate loading; Implant surface
Authors: Pietro Felice; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Carlo Barausse; Giovanni Grandi; Marco Esposito Journal: Eur J Oral Implantol Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.123
Authors: Jamil A Shibli; Carlo Mangano; Francesco Mangano; José A Rodrigues; Alessandra Cassoni; Karen Bechara; Jose Divino B Ferreia; Alexandre M Dottore; Giovanna Iezzi; Adriano Piattelli Journal: J Periodontol Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 6.993
Authors: Charles Marin; Rodrigo Granato; Marcelo Suzuki; Jose N Gil; Adriano Piattelli; Paulo G Coelho Journal: J Periodontol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 6.993
Authors: Dong Zhang; Xianlei Zong; Xiaoshuang Guo; Hong Du; Guodong Song; Xiaolei Jin Journal: Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi Date: 2021-01-15
Authors: Raquel Zita Gomes; Mario Ramalho de Vasconcelos; Isabel Maria Lopes Guerra; Rute Alexandra Borges de Almeida; Antonio Cabral de Campos Felino Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Fausto Zamparini; Carlo Prati; Luigi Generali; Andrea Spinelli; Paola Taddei; Maria Giovanna Gandolfi Journal: J Funct Biomater Date: 2021-01-07
Authors: Miltiadis E Mitsias; Konstantinos D Siormpas; Georgios A Kotsakis; Scott D Ganz; Carlo Mangano; Giovanna Iezzi Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 3.411