Literature DB >> 28153663

Obesity and cell-free DNA "no calls": is there an optimal gestational age at time of sampling?

Mary C Livergood1, Kay A LeChien2, Amanda S Trudell3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA screen failures or "no calls" occur in 1-12% of samples and are frustrating for both clinician and patient. The rate of "no calls" has been shown to have an inverse relationship with gestational age. Recent studies have shown an increased risk for "no calls" among obese women.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the optimal gestational age for cell-free DNA among obese women. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent cell-free DNA at a single tertiary care center from 2011 through 2016. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for a "no call" were determined for each weight class and compared to normal-weight women. The predicted probability of a "no call" with 95% confidence intervals were determined for each week of gestation for normal-weight and obese women and compared.
RESULTS: Among 2385 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 105 (4.4%) had a "no call". Compared to normal-weight women, the adjusted odds ratio of a "no call" increased with increasing weight class from overweight to obesity class III (respectively: adjusted odds ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-4.42 to adjusted odds ratio, 8.55; 95% confidence interval, 4.16-17.56). A cut point at 21 weeks was identified for obesity class II/III women at which there is no longer a significant difference in the probability of a "no call" for obese women compared to normal weight women. From 8-16 weeks, there is a 4.5% reduction in the probability of a "no call" for obesity class II/III women (respectively: 14.9%; 95% confidence interval, 8.95-20.78 and 10.4%; 95% confidence interval, 7.20-13.61; Ptrend < .01).
CONCLUSION: The cut point of 21 weeks for optimal sampling of cell-free DNA limits reproductive choices. However, a progressive fall in the probability of a "no call" with advancing gestational age suggests that delaying cell-free DNA for obese women is a reasonable strategy to reduce the probability of a "no call".
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneuploidy screening; cell-free DNA screening; noninvasive prenatal screening; noninvasive prenatal testing; obesity; “no call”

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28153663     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  14 in total

Review 1.  The Risks Associated With Obesity in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Johannes Stubert; Frank Reister; Steffi Hartmann; Wolfgang Janni
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Sequencing of short cfDNA fragments in NIPT improves fetal fraction with higher maternal BMI and early gestational age.

Authors:  Longwei Qiao; Qin Zhang; Yuting Liang; Ang Gao; Yang Ding; Nannan Zhao; Wei Zhang; Hong Li; Yaojuan Lu; Ting Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Association of fetal fraction with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy incidence and disease severity.

Authors:  Raj Shree; Teodora R Kolarova; Hayley J MacKinnon; Christina M Lockwood; Suchitra Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2022-05-27

4.  The Effect of Elevated Alanine Transaminase on Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Failures.

Authors:  Ping Chen; Longwei Qiao; Sheng Zhang; Jieyu Jin; Jun Cao; Yuqiong Zhang; Haoyu Tang; Zheng Yu; Jingye Shi; JingPing Yin; Yuting Liang; Xiao Wu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  The Effect of Maternal Obesity on Placental Cell-Free DNA Release in a Mouse Model.

Authors:  Mohak Mhatre; Sharareh Adeli; Errol Norwitz; Sabrina Craigo; Mark Phillippe; Andrea Edlow
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 6.  Potential of Next-Generation Sequencing in Noninvasive Fetal Molecular Blood Group Genotyping.

Authors:  Sandra Wienzek-Lischka; Sandy Bachmann; Vanessa Froehner; Gregor Bein
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.747

7.  Cell-Free Fetal DNA Increases Prior to Labor at Term and in a Subset of Preterm Births.

Authors:  Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Roberto Romero; George Schwenkel; Valeria Garcia-Flores; Bogdan Panaitescu; Aneesha Varrey; Fatime Ayoub; Sonia S Hassan; Mark Phillippe
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.060

8.  Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13, Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies, and Microdeletions: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

9.  Low fetal fraction in obese women at first trimester cell-free DNA based prenatal screening is not accompanied by differences in total cell-free DNA.

Authors:  Raj Shree; Teodora R Kolarova; Hayley J MacKinnon; Jaclynne M Hedge; Elena Vinopal; Kimberly K Ma; Christina M Lockwood; Suchitra Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.242

10.  Prenatal cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy in pregnant women at average or high risk: Results from a large US clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Carrie Guy; Farnoosh Haji-Sheikhi; Charles M Rowland; Ben Anderson; Renius Owen; Felicitas L Lacbawan; Damian P Alagia
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.