Literature DB >> 28153372

Six Sigma Quality Management System and Design of Risk-based Statistical Quality Control.

James O Westgard1, Sten A Westgard2.   

Abstract

Six sigma concepts provide a quality management system (QMS) with many useful tools for managing quality in medical laboratories. This Six Sigma QMS is driven by the quality required for the intended use of a test. The most useful form for this quality requirement is the allowable total error. Calculation of a sigma-metric provides the best predictor of risk for an analytical examination process, as well as a design parameter for selecting the statistical quality control (SQC) procedure necessary to detect medically important errors. Simple point estimates of sigma at medical decision concentrations are sufficient for laboratory applications.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Analytical run; Frequency of QC; Process capability; Quality management system; SQC; Six Sigma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28153372     DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2016.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lab Med        ISSN: 0272-2712            Impact factor:   1.935


  9 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for Group Testing: A Practical Approach for the Clinical Laboratory.

Authors:  Jun G Tan; Aznan Omar; Wendy By Lee; Moh S Wong
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2020-12

Review 2.  Implementing a Quality Management System in the Medical Microbiology Laboratory.

Authors:  Roberta B Carey; Sanjib Bhattacharyya; Sue C Kehl; Larissa M Matukas; Michael A Pentella; Max Salfinger; Audrey N Schuetz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Evaluation of Sigma Metrics and Westgard Rule Selection and Implementation of Internal Quality Control in Clinical Chemistry Reference Laboratory, Ethiopian Public Health Institute.

Authors:  Zeleke Geto; Tigist Getahun; Tadesse Lejisa; Yosef Tolcha; Demirew Bikila; Chala Bashea; Mehari Meles; Wossene Habtu; Genet Ashebir; Bikila Negasa; Meron Sileshi; Yeabkal Daniel; Andargachew Gashu; Feyissa Challa
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2021-08-02

Review 4.  Bringing the clinical laboratory into the strategy to advance diagnostic excellence.

Authors:  Ira M Lubin; J Rex Astles; Shahram Shahangian; Bereneice Madison; Ritchard Parry; Robert L Schmidt; Matthew L Rubinstein
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-06

Review 5.  Analytical Sigma metrics: A review of Six Sigma implementation tools for medical laboratories.

Authors:  Sten Westgard; Hassan Bayat; James O Westgard
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

6.  Analysis of Effect of Six Sigma Method Combined with CI Strategy on Improving of Nursing Quality in Outpatient Infusion Rooms.

Authors:  Xiuqin Shen; Jiao Wei; Ying Zhang; Yinying Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Risk analysis and assessment based on Sigma metrics and intended use.

Authors:  Yong Xia; Hao Xue; Cunliang Yan; Bowen Li; ShuQiong Zhang; Mingyang Li; Ling Ji
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

8.  Application of Six Sigma for evaluating the analytical quality of tumor marker assays.

Authors:  Qian Liu; Mei Fu; Fumeng Yang; Wei Liang; Chuanxi Yang; Wenjun Zhu; Liming Ma; Changxin Zhao
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.352

9.  Quality Improvement Initiatives in Reforming Patient Support Groups-Three-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Chieh-Liang Wu; Chia-Hua Liou; Shih-An Liu; Cheng-Hsu Chen; Wayne H-H Sheu; I-Ju Chou; Shang-Feng Tsai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.