Literature DB >> 28152059

Morbid obesity in Taiwan: Prevalence, trends, associated social demographics, and lifestyle factors.

Heng-Cheng Chang1,2, Hsin-Chou Yang3, Hsing-Yi Chang4, Chih-Jung Yeh5, Hsin-Hung Chen6, Kuo-Chin Huang7, Wen-Harn Pan1,2,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is one of the most important public health issues worldwide. Moreover, an extreme phenotype, morbid obesity (MO) has insidiously become a global problem. Therefore, we aimed to document the prevalence trend and to unveil the epidemiological characteristics of MO in Taiwan.
METHODS: Nationally representative samples aged 19 years and above from three consecutive waves of Nutrition and Health survey in Taiwan: 1993-1996, 2005-2008, and 2013-2014 (n = 3,071; 1,673; and 1,440; respectively) were analyzed for prevalence trend. And 39 MO (BMI ≥35 kg/m2) cases from the two recent surveys compared with 156 age, gender, and survey-matched normal weight controls (BMI: 18.5-24 kg/m2) for epidemiological characteristics study. The reduced rank regression analysis was used to find dietary pattern associated with MO.
RESULTS: The prevalence of overweight and obesity together (BMI ≥24 kg/m2) was stabilized in the recent two surveys, but that of MO (0.4%, 0.6%, to 1.4%) and obesity (BMI ≥27 kg/m2) (11.8%, 17.9%, to 22.0%) increased sharply. MO cases tended to have lower levels of education, personal income, and physical activity. Furthermore, their dietary pattern featured with a higher consumption frequency of red meat, processed animal products, and sweets/sweetened beverage, but lower frequencies of fresh fruits, nuts, breakfast cereal, and dairy products.
CONCLUSION: This study documents a polarization phenomenon with smaller proportion of overweight people at the center and higher proportions of normal weight and obesity subjects at two extremes. MO was associated with low socioeconomic status and poor dietary pattern. The obesogenic dietary pattern became more prevalent in later time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28152059      PMCID: PMC5289420          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Obesity is a major public health issue in the world. It has been estimated that there are approximately 1.9 billion adults who are either overweight or obese (body mass index, BMI ≥25 kg/m2). Among them, over 600 million are obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2)[1]. According to World Health Organization (WHO), this problem of energy imbalance may have contributed to an estimated 3.4 million death each year including those resulted from cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cancers[2, 3]. Quality of life of the obese may also be compromised by conditions such as osteoarthritis, work disability, depression and sleep apnea [2, 3]. The current worldwide prevalence of obesity in adults has been more than doubled in the world since 1980[1].At the same time, the trend of obesity rates seems to be levelling off in some developed countries since 2006[4].On the other hand, the prevalence of an extreme phenotype, morbid obesity (MO) (BMI ≥40 kg/m2), is not only persistently rising, but also expected to increase in an accelerating speed in the coming decades [5, 6].Compared to those whom were overweight and obesity, MO population suffer from even a shorter life expectancy, greater severity of many comorbidity, and higher all-cause mortality rate[7, 8],so that associated medical cost and social economic burden are tremendous[9, 10]. And yet weight control measures are less efficient for MO except an extreme measure, bariatric surgery[11]. Taking a preventive standpoint, it is important to understand the trends and risk factors of MO, in order to plan ahead for screening high risk youth, promoting healthy life style, and building supportive environments. However, there are viewpoints such that severe obesity is mainly genetic in origin, not due to the lifestyle and environmental factors[12]. Therefore, in this study we aimed to take advantage of the data from Nutrition and Health Surveys in Taiwan (NAHSIT) to document the MO prevalence trend from near zero to its abrupt appearance and to assess the epidemiological characteristics of MO in Taiwan, an Asian region in a rapid transition.

Materials and methods

Study designs and subjects

In this study, use was made of 3 waves of Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan (NAHSIT): 1993–1996, 2005–2008, and 2013–2014. The NAHSIT survey has been described elsewhere [13, 14]. In brief, the 3 surveys adopted stratified three-staged probability sampling scheme. According to the geographic areas and the specific ethnic groups, Taiwan was divided into several strata in the two earlier surveys. In the latest survey, the 20 strata were corresponding to the 20 counties or metropolitan cities. And then, three-stage sampling was carried out in each stratum. First stage was for the selection of primary sampling units (PSU: townships or city districts) via the method of probability proportional to size. Next stage was to randomly choose two initial households within each selected PSU. And the final stage was to do door to door survey in two clusters, starting from each of the two initial households. The protocol and informed consent form have been approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) of Academia Sinica and National Health Research Institutes. A signed informed consent has been obtained from every participant prior to the data collection. The sample size was 3,071, 1,673 and 1,440 for those who aged equal to or above 19 years old, respectively from the 3 surveys for the prevalence estimation. There were 16 MO (BMI ≥35 kg/m2) cases found in NAHSIT 2005–2008 and 23 MO cases in 2013–2014. For epidemiological characteristics comparison, a total of 64 age (±3 years) and gender-matched normal BMI (18.5–24 kg/m2) controls were selected in a 4 to 1 ratio [15] for the former survey and 92 controls selected the same way for the latter survey.

Data collection and derivation of variables of interest

In a face-to-face interview, data on socio-demographics (education, personal income, and occupation), physical activity, and lifestyles (drinking, smoking, betel nut chewing and dietary intake assessed by 24-hour recall and food frequency) were collected. Anthropometric and biochemical profiles were assessed through physical examination. To appraise energy expenditure from physical activity, we obtained metabolic equivalents of task (METs) for each physical activity and weighted these METs with their corresponding physical activity time [16, 17]. The median MET-minutes per week were compared between NW and MO. Further, we assessed and compared the percentage below the recommendation of physical activity (450 MET-minutes per week) between NW and MO [16, 17].For characterizing smoking, alcohol drinking and betel nut chewing habits, we have three categories for each: namely “never-users” for those who never established the habit, “ex-users” for those who had the habit but had quitted, and “current user” for those who continued with the habit. Twenty four-hour dietary recall [13]was used to appraise mean dietary nutrient intake levels. We assessed and compared median nutrient density [18](nutrient level divided by the total kcal of an individual and multiplied by 2000) between MO cases and NW controls. We used information on food frequency to search for dietary pattern associated with obesity. From a total of 72 original food items, we combined them into 21 food categories considering the food groups and nutrient density. And then reduced rank regression (RRR) [19] was applied to generate a linear combination of correlated food frequencies which maximized the BMI variation explained. The factor loading value generated from RRR for each food category (Table C in S1 File) was used to calculate factor loading value-weighted sum of the consumption frequencies, i.e. the dietary pattern score. Since the higher the absolute factor loading values, the greater the association with BMI; food categories with higher absolute factor loading values were considered as influential and used to describe the dietary pattern.

Statistical analysis

The data was analyzed using SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Inc., NC, USA). All samples in each survey were weighted by individual sample weights to estimate the prevalence rates of underweight, normal weight, overweight, and 3 classes of obesity. For describing characteristics of the MO and matched NW, frequencies and proportions are presented for categorical variables; so are mean (standard deviation, SD), median, or inter-quartile range (25th to 75th percentiles) for continuous variables. The Chi-square test (for proportion), and/or Mann-Whitney U test (for continuous variables with non-normal distributions) were used when appropriate to test the differences between cases and controls. The RRR analysis was used to find dietary pattern associated with BMI and to calculate the dietary pattern score as described above. We included in those food categories with absolute factor loading values higher than 0.15 to show the meaning of dietary pattern. And then Spearman correlation was used to examine the correlation between the food frequency and the dietary pattern score derived. Finally, logistic regression was used to assess the associations between morbid obesity and various lifestyle and socioeconomic variables significantly different between MO and NW, including: dietary pattern score, physical inactivity, betel nut chewing, education and personal income.

Results

Trends for prevalence rates of overweight, obesity and MO

According to 3 waves of the NAHSIT data from 1993–1996, 2005–2008 to the latest 2013–2014 (Fig 1), the percentage of overweight increased from 1993–1996 to 2005–2008, but stabilized from 2005–2008 to 2013. However, both the prevalence rates of obesity (11.8%, 17.9%, to 22.1%) and MO (0.4%, 0.6%, to1.4%) increased sharply in Taiwan.
Fig 1

The BMI distribution (proportions of underweight, normal weight, overweight, and several obesity classes) and median dietary pattern score by surveys.

Socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics of the MO

We found that MO status was significantly and negatively associated with the levels of education (p = 0.0247) and income (p = 0.0372) and physical inactivity (< 450 MET-minutes per week) (p = 0.0028), and the betel nut chewing habit (p = 0.0138) (Table 1). However, no significant differences were found between MO cases and NW controls with respect to occupation type, alcohol consumption, smoking status, and sleeping duration; although some unfavorable trends for sleeping time and smoking can be seen for MO.
Table 1

Socio-demographic, lifestyle characteristics of the normal weight and the morbid obesity groups.

Normal Weight b (18.5≦BMI<24)Morbid Obesity b (BMI≧35)Pc
n = 156n = 39
BMI a (kg/m2)21.51.6392.9
Age (Years)3613.235.913.4
19–30 years (%)51.351.3
30–50 years (%)25.625.6
50–65 years (%)23.123.1
Gender
Female (%)66.766.7
Male (%)33.333.3
Education
Elementary school (%)9.620.50.0247
High schools (%)4353.9
University or above (%)47.425.6
Occupation
Blue Collar (%)55.272.70.1376
Low level manager (%)16.96.1
High level manager (%)27.921.2
Socioeconomic Level
Low (%)3657.60.0760
Middle (%)38.224.2
High (%)25.718.2
Personal Income per month
Under 30,000 NTD (%)52.673.70.0188
Above 30,000 NTD (%)47.426.3
Marriage Status
Single (%)43.6410.7135
Married (%)48.153.9
Divorced/Widow(er)s (%)8.35.1
Physical Activity (MET-Minutes)900(300–2157.5)397.5(0.0–1350.0)0.0084
Under 450 MET-Minutes Per Weeks (%)30.856.40.0028
Sleeping duration (hours)7.7(7.0–8.3)7.7(6.4–8.5)0.9060
Under 7 hours (%)2535.90.1712
Above 7 hours (%)7564.1
Smoking
Never (%)5840.90.3281
Ex-smoker (%)13.622.7
Current (%)28.436.4
Alcohol Drinking
Never (%)47.246.20.9583
Ex-drinker (%)2.83.9
Current (%)5050
Betel Nut Chewing
Never (%)94.281.10.0138
Ex-chewer (%)3.25.4
Current (%)2.613.5

a BMI: body mass index.

b Mean (SD) for age and BMI; Median and interquartile range (25th -75th percentile) or %.

c The case and control group were compared with either Mann-Whitney U test(†) or Chi-square test(‡).

a BMI: body mass index. b Mean (SD) for age and BMI; Median and interquartile range (25th -75th percentile) or %. c The case and control group were compared with either Mann-Whitney U test(†) or Chi-square test(‡).

Comparing dietary nutrient intake levels between MO and NW

The median caloric intake per day was higher in MO cases than in NW controls (Table 2). However, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.4352). In terms of quality of the diet, fat density was significantly higher; but carbohydrate, dietary fiber and calcium densities were significantly lower in MO cases than in NW controls. Nevertheless, no significant difference was found for nutrient densities of various water- or fat-soluble vitamins.
Table 2

Median total caloric intake and nutrient intake levels per 2000 calories by weight status (normal weight vs morbid obesity).

Characteristics aNormal Weight b (18.5≤BMI<24)Morbid Obesity b (BMI≥35)Pc
n = 156n = 39
Calorie (kcal/day)1917.6(1397.2–2511.0)2111.5(1489.5–2617.2)0.4352
Carbohydrate (g)263.3(226.8–297.9)236.3(195.3–272.8)0.0091
Protein (g)81.0(67.8–95.3)84.1(62.9–94.4)0.7887
Fat (g)69.0(56.1–81.3)80.1(66.8–97.8)0.0009
Cholesterol (mg)297.9(147.7–466.5)385.0(135.1–479.2)0.2974
Dietary fiber (g)16.6(10.8–23.7)12.8(7.9–21.7)0.0337
Vit. B1 (mg)1.1(0.8–1.6)1.2(0.9–1.6)0.2166
Vit. B2 (mg)1.2(0.9–1.6)1.1(0.8–1.5)0.4342
Nicotinic acid (mg)18.3(13.2–23.6)19.2(15.3–24.3)0.3839
Vit. B6 (mg)1.7(1.3–2.4)1.8(1.3–2.2)0.9078
Vit. B12 (μg)3.1(1.9–6.2)3.1(2.1–6.2)0.7236
Vit. C (mg)125.2(59.5–223.6)125.7(40.5–252.0)0.9507
Vit. A (ug)579.1(333.7–1039.0)629.8(306.5–1243.9)0.9456
Vit. D (μg)3.6(1.8–7.5)3.2(1.3–9.1)0.3815
Vit. E (mg)8.2(5.9–10.7)8.5(5.8–10.6)0.6650
Na (g)3.6(2.7–4.5)4.0(2.8–5.7)0.1854
K (g)2.5(1.9–3.4)2.4(1.9–3.1)0.3961
Mg (mg)281.4(205.8–350.8)254.1(195.2–324.1)0.3278
Ca (mg)471.7(311.3–749.0)410.1(203.1–548.9)0.0271
P (mg)1131.3(958.7–1455.8)1119.7(914.7–1247.1)0.1060
Zn (mg)10.4(8.3–13.1)10.1(8.4–13.3)0.8280
Fe (mg)14.2(10.7–18.3)13.3(9.8–17.0)0.3093

a BMI: body mass index; Vit.: vitamin; Na: sodium; K: potassium; Mg: magnesium; Ca: calcium; P: phosphorus; Zn: zinc; Fe: iron.

b Median and interquartile range (25th - 75th percentile).

c The case and control group were compared with Mann-Whitney U test.

a BMI: body mass index; Vit.: vitamin; Na: sodium; K: potassium; Mg: magnesium; Ca: calcium; P: phosphorus; Zn: zinc; Fe: iron. b Median and interquartile range (25th - 75th percentile). c The case and control group were compared with Mann-Whitney U test.

Dietary pattern associated with MO

The frequencies of these food categories were all significantly (p<0.05) correlated with the dietary pattern score (Table 3). Therefore, this BMI associated dietary pattern was featured with lower frequencies of fresh fruits and 100% juice; nuts; milk, yogurt, and cheese; breakfast cereals; and beverage without sugar (coffee and tea); but higher frequencies of red meat; processed seafood and meat products; ice pop, candy, and sweetened beverage.
Table 3

Food items with high absolute loading values discovered by RRR analysis, correlation coefficients between food frequency and dietary pattern score, and median food frequency by weight status.

Food itemRRRMedian food intake frequency per month
Loading value aCorrelation coefficient bNormal Weight (18.5≤BMI<24) n = 156Morbid Obesity (BMI≥35) n = 39P c
Ice pop, candy, sweetened beverage0.420.68***5.08.20.1562
Red meat0.240.30***3.05.00.0726
Processed seafood & meat products0.170.28**1.21.20.4697
Tea & Coffee (no sugar)-0.16-0.38***1.00.00.2049
Breakfast cereals-0.20-0.28**0.00.00.2237
Milk, Yogurt, Cheese-0.28-0.41***1.40.80.1124
Nuts-0.35-0.25**0.30.00.0209
Fresh fruit & 100% juice-0.36-0.52***5.23.70.0345

a The factor loading was calculated by reduced rank regression (RRR).

b The correlation coefficient between food frequency and dietary pattern score was calculated by Spearman correlation.

*P-value <0.05;

**P-value <0.001;

***P-value <0.0001

c The case and control group were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test.

a The factor loading was calculated by reduced rank regression (RRR). b The correlation coefficient between food frequency and dietary pattern score was calculated by Spearman correlation. *P-value <0.05; **P-value <0.001; ***P-value <0.0001 c The case and control group were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test. For comparing frequency of single food item between MO and NW (Table 3), fresh fruits and 100% juice (p = 0.0345) and nuts (p = 0.0209) were consumed significantly more by NW controls than MO cases. In contrast, red meat (p = 0.0726) were consumed more by MO cases than NW controls at a borderline significance level. Other items also showed the trends in line with the dietary pattern, but significance was not achieved. Finally, we examined the independent effect of dietary pattern score on MO status (Table 4). In univariate analysis, we found that dietary pattern score, physical inactivity, and low levels of education and income were associated with MO, respectively with age and sex controlled. Betel nut chewing was not (data not shown). However, when both dietary pattern factor and physical inactivity were included in the model (model 1), only dietary pattern score was significant. If we further included in education and income variables (model 2), the significance remained for the dietary pattern score with a significant trend (p for trend = 0.0002). The median of dietary pattern score increased steadily from 1993–1996, to 2005–208, and to 2013–2014 (see Fig 1).
Table 4

The Odds ratio of quartiles of dietary pattern score to morbid obesity.

UnivariateModel 1.Model 2.
OR95% CIOR95% CIOR95% CI
Dietary pattern scoresa
Q11.01.01.0
Q20.9(0.2–4.6)0.9(0.2–4.7)0.8(0.1–4.0)
Q35.4(1.5–20.1)4.7(1.2–17.9)3.9(1.0–15.6)
Q46.7(1.8–24.8)5.8(1.5–22.2)4.7(1.2–19.0)
Physical Activity
MET-Minutes per week<4502.8(1.3–6.0)2.1(1.0–4.8)1.9(0.8–4.5)
450≦MET-Minutes per week1.01.01.0
Education level
Elementary school6.9(1.8–26.2)4.0(0.9–17.6)
High schools2.1(0.9–5.0)1.7(0.7–4.3)
University or above1.01.0
Personal income
Under 30,000 NTD3.0(1.2–7.2)2.2(0.8–5.9)
Above 30,000 NTD1.01.0
p for trend of dietary pattern scores0.00080.00250.0071

Total N = 175. 16 subjects (12 controls and 4 cases) were excluded due to missing values on FFQ.

a The dietary pattern score was the weighted sum of food frequencies, weighted by loading factors generated from RRR.

Univariate: age and sex-controlled. Model 1: dietary pattern scores and physical activity controlled for age and sex. Model 2: Model 1 adjusted further for education level, and personal income.

Total N = 175. 16 subjects (12 controls and 4 cases) were excluded due to missing values on FFQ. a The dietary pattern score was the weighted sum of food frequencies, weighted by loading factors generated from RRR. Univariate: age and sex-controlled. Model 1: dietary pattern scores and physical activity controlled for age and sex. Model 2: Model 1 adjusted further for education level, and personal income.

Discussion

Over past four decades, global age-standardized prevalence of obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) increased from 3.2% to 10.8% in men, and from 6.4% to 14.9% in women [20]. And in Taiwan, the prevalence trend of overweight or obesity (BMI≥24 kg/m2) together has increased from 33.2%to 43.4% (1993–1996 to 2005–2008) and remained that level in latest survey. However, the prevalence trend of obesity (BMI≥27 kg/m2) was continuously increasing from 11.8%, 17.9%, and reached 22.0% in 2013–2014. Moreover, there was a noticeable increase in the MO (BMI≥35 kg/m2) prevalence in the same period, from 0.4% to more than one and half percentage. However, prevalence of overweight decreased from 25.5% during the 2005–2008 survey to the recent 21.3%. These findings suggest that, although the prevalence stabilized for overweight and obesity as a whole, the prevalence of obesity including the “morbid obesity" is dramatically rising. Similar observations were also seen recently in European countries, US, Sweden, and China [4, 12, 21–23]. It is likely that this phenomenon of BMI polarization in Taiwan is due in part to the shifting to the desirable weight range for those who were at the lower end of the overweight range, since the shrinkage of overweight proportion occurred clearly after the nationwide campaign on "Losing 6 Million Tons" in 2011[24] and mostly health conscious people participated in the movement. What happened at the other end of the spectrum seems to show that the obesogenic environment continues to pull more toward BMI beyond the obesity and the MO cut-points. We have demonstrated that MO cases have much worse clinical chemistry and metabolic profiles than their non-obese counter parts(Table B in S1 File), similar to many other reports[25]. One should not overlook the threat of MO for health and economics in the years to come [26] and it is crucial to understand the epidemiological characteristics of the MO in order to make effective strategic plans. We have found that MO subjects tended to be the under-privileged, i.e., with lower level of education and income. Their low physical activity and poor dietary pattern are in part associated with their socioeconomic status (SES). The relationship between SES and obesity has been widely studied [27-29]. In the developing countries, obesity tends to be positively associated with SES. However, in the developed countries, the directions of the association are mixed. In addition, across different socioeconomic categories, the obesity prevalence seems to rise with time in the group with lower education level, and remains stable or increases slightly in the group with higher education level[30, 31]. The association between MO and low SES may indicate that Taiwanese have experienced the nutrition transition. As economy developed, the dietary pattern also changed from whole foods and plant foods-rich one into those abundant with animal products and processed foods high in fats and sugar[32, 33]. Therefore, it would lead to obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases[34, 35]. This transition has been observed in many countries in Asia too [36]. It is crucial to understand the nutrient vectors or food vectors contributing to obesity or MO for developing effective health policies. Dietary pattern analysis for obesity or for incremental BMI gained much attention recently [37]. Most of the dietary pattern studies [38-40] employed principle component (or factor) analysis and obtained healthy (prudent) vs. western (animal protein) patterns or traditional vs. modern patterns. Western, modern, and animal protein pattern concurred with higher risk, but healthy and traditional ones with lower risk of obesity. Only a few studies in Greece[41] and in Australia [42] applied RRR method in recent years, identifying a pattern featured with increased sweets/SSB and red/processed meat, but lowered fruits and vegetables. Our study is the first studying Asians. Our findings on nutrient density from 24-hour recall and on food pattern analysis with food frequency questionnaire are consistent between each other and with the previous mentioned RRR studies. According to the 24-hour recall, the MO subjects tend to consume a diet high in fat; but low in calcium, fiber and carbohydrate. From dimension reduction analysis of the food frequency data, the diet of Taiwanese MO was composed of less fresh fruit, nuts, breakfast cereals, and dairy products; but of more red meat, processed animal products, and sweets/sweetened beverage. These findings on diet are consistent with the obesogenic dietary pattern discovered previously, i.e., abundant with animal products and processed foods high in fat and simple sugar [32, 34–43], although percent energy from carbohydrate is relatively less in the MO subjects of our study. It is interesting to observe that some not commonly consumed food items such as nuts, breakfast cereal and dairies are beneficial in Taiwan. High consumption frequency of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has been associated with some adverse health consequences, i.e., obesity, metabolic syndromes, gout, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [44]. Our data showed that it is the dietary pattern with less nutrient dense foods and more SSBs which made the contributions. Although it is probably hard to tease apart the contributions from lack of nutrient-dense foods, our findings suggest that the key problem may be accessibility and affordability of the healthy food (wholegrain cereals, fruits and vegetables) rather than availability of foods in Taiwan nowadays[45, 46]. We were able to show that median of BMI-associated dietary pattern score increased steadily from 1990’s to 2010’s (0.8 →1.0 →1.6), indicating a shift toward obesogenic dietary pattern. Effective public health measures are required to educate people and to build healthy eating environment. We also found that low physical activity was significantly associated with MO. Although, it was hard to separate the effect of diet and physical activity, there are large declines in level of physical activity and increases in sedentary behavior globally[47]. Lack of sufficient physical activity has been viewed as a major crisis of public health[48, 49], including data from Taiwan [50] and China [51]. Unfortunately, we could not examine the trend of physical inactivity due to different questionnaires employed in three surveys. This is the first study portraying MO epidemiology in an Asian population, providing not only the descriptive statistics but also socio-demographic and lifestyle determinants of the MO. However, there are some limitations in this study. First of all, the sample size of MO and the power of the study are relatively small. We did not observe an effect from sleeping duration, and caloric intake due to low statistical power contributed by small sample size, relatively small effect and large variation of the variables. Nevertheless, our study provides a first glance on epidemiological characteristics of MO in an Asian population. Secondly, some of the discovered associations between MO and epidemiological characteristics are cross-sectional in nature. Cautions should be taken to interpret the findings, in particularly on the negative association between physical activity and MO status. Although physical inactivity may contribute to positive energy balance leading to obesity, MO subjects may also have difficulty to carry out physical activity. Furthermore, genetic factors may contribute to the development of obesity and morbid obesity. Individual with the genetic susceptibility may be more so influenced[52] by obesogenic environment[53] such as the accessibility of processed and high-energy-dense foods, and desk-constrained works as a consequence of modernization and social development. The risk factors of MO found in this study were exactly what resulted from the obesogenic environments. However, it is lacking genetic epidemiology study on MO, especially in Asian populations. Further research on genetics of MO in Asian populations is needed. We could not investigate the genetic and environmental interactions in this study, since genetic component was not included in the IRB approval. In summary, this study illustrates how MO and desirable weight polarized recently in Taiwan. In addition, comprehensive epidemiological characteristics of MO have been studied. MO primarily appears among those who had lower education and personal income. They were physically inactive and tend to consume a nutrient-poor dietary pattern which are high in red meat/processed animal products and sweets/sweeten beverage, but less in fruits, nuts, and vegetables. Our results point to the role of poor lifestyle and associated obesogenic environmental factors in contributing to the development of MO in those of the underprivileged, which have important implications in developing national health policy.

Definition and Database.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  46 in total

Review 1.  The public health impact of obesity.

Authors:  T L Visscher; J C Seidell
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 2.  The levelling off of the obesity epidemic since the year 1999--a review of evidence and perspectives.

Authors:  B Rokholm; J L Baker; T I A Sørensen
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 3.  Medical consequences of obesity.

Authors:  George A Bray
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Application of a new statistical method to derive dietary patterns in nutritional epidemiology.

Authors:  Kurt Hoffmann; Matthias B Schulze; Anja Schienkiewitz; Ute Nöthlings; Heiner Boeing
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  The economics of obesity: dietary energy density and energy cost.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski; Nicole Darmon
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030.

Authors:  Eric A Finkelstein; Olga A Khavjou; Hope Thompson; Justin G Trogdon; Liping Pan; Bettylou Sherry; William Dietz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  A break in the obesity epidemic? Explained by biases or misinterpretation of the data?

Authors:  T L S Visscher; B L Heitmann; A Rissanen; M Lahti-Koski; L Lissner
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Stephen S Lim; Theo Vos; Abraham D Flaxman; Goodarz Danaei; Kenji Shibuya; Heather Adair-Rohani; Markus Amann; H Ross Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Martin Aryee; Charles Atkinson; Loraine J Bacchus; Adil N Bahalim; Kalpana Balakrishnan; John Balmes; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Carissa Bonner; Guilherme Borges; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Michael Brauer; Peter Brooks; Nigel G Bruce; Bert Brunekreef; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Fiona Bull; Richard T Burnett; Tim E Byers; Bianca Calabria; Jonathan Carapetis; Emily Carnahan; Zoe Chafe; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Jian Shen Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; Jennifer Christine Child; Aaron Cohen; K Ellicott Colson; Benjamin C Cowie; Sarah Darby; Susan Darling; Adrian Davis; Louisa Degenhardt; Frank Dentener; Don C Des Jarlais; Karen Devries; Mukesh Dherani; Eric L Ding; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Karen Edmond; Suad Eltahir Ali; Rebecca E Engell; Patricia J Erwin; Saman Fahimi; Gail Falder; Farshad Farzadfar; Alize Ferrari; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Greg Freedman; Michael K Freeman; Emmanuela Gakidou; Santu Ghosh; Edward Giovannucci; Gerhard Gmel; Kathryn Graham; Rebecca Grainger; Bridget Grant; David Gunnell; Hialy R Gutierrez; Wayne Hall; Hans W Hoek; Anthony Hogan; H Dean Hosgood; Damian Hoy; Howard Hu; Bryan J Hubbell; Sally J Hutchings; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Gemma L Jacklyn; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Jost B Jonas; Haidong Kan; John A Kanis; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Young-Ho Khang; Shahab Khatibzadeh; Jon-Paul Khoo; Cindy Kok; Francine Laden; Ratilal Lalloo; Qing Lan; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; James Leigh; Yang Li; John Kent Lin; Steven E Lipshultz; Stephanie London; Rafael Lozano; Yuan Lu; Joelle Mak; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; Robin Marks; Randall Martin; Paul McGale; John McGrath; Sumi Mehta; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Renata Micha; Catherine Michaud; Vinod Mishra; Khayriyyah Mohd Hanafiah; Ali A Mokdad; Lidia Morawska; Dariush Mozaffarian; Tasha Murphy; Mohsen Naghavi; Bruce Neal; Paul K Nelson; Joan Miquel Nolla; Rosana Norman; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Jessica Orchard; Richard Osborne; Bart Ostro; Andrew Page; Kiran D Pandey; Charles D H Parry; Erin Passmore; Jayadeep Patra; Neil Pearce; Pamela M Pelizzari; Max Petzold; Michael R Phillips; Dan Pope; C Arden Pope; John Powles; Mayuree Rao; Homie Razavi; Eva A Rehfuess; Jürgen T Rehm; Beate Ritz; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Jose A Rodriguez-Portales; Isabelle Romieu; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Ananya Roy; Lesley Rushton; Joshua A Salomon; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; Amir Sapkota; Soraya Seedat; Peilin Shi; Kevin Shield; Rupak Shivakoti; Gitanjali M Singh; David A Sleet; Emma Smith; Kirk R Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Kyle Steenland; Heidi Stöckl; Lars Jacob Stovner; Kurt Straif; Lahn Straney; George D Thurston; Jimmy H Tran; Rita Van Dingenen; Aaron van Donkelaar; J Lennert Veerman; Lakshmi Vijayakumar; Robert Weintraub; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Warwick Williams; Nicholas Wilson; Anthony D Woolf; Paul Yip; Jan M Zielinski; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Majid Ezzati; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Association between Dietary Patterns and the Indicators of Obesity among Chinese: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Long Shu; Pei-Fen Zheng; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Cai-Juan Si; Xiao-Long Yu; Wei Gao; Lun Zhang; Dan Liao
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19·2 million participants.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  36 in total

1.  Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery in the Asia-Pacific Region: APMBSS 2018 Survey.

Authors:  Masayuki Ohta; Yosuke Seki; Simon Ki-Hung Wong; Cunchuan Wang; Chih-Kun Huang; Ahmad Aly; Manish Baijal; Salman Al-Sabah; Suthep Udomsawaengsup; Yoon Seok Heo; Saad Sqer Althuwaini; Alper Celik; Nafad El-Hadidi; Davit Sargsyan; Tikfu Gee; Jaideepraj Rao; Errawan R Wiradisuria; Edward Oliveros; Seigo Kitano; Kazunori Kasama
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Gender difference in the association of dietary patterns and metabolic parameters with obesity in young and middle-aged adults with dyslipidemia and abnormal fasting plasma glucose in Taiwan.

Authors:  Li-Yin Lin; Chien-Yeh Hsu; Hsiu-An Lee; Alexey A Tinkov; Anatoly V Skalny; Wan-Hsiang Wang; Jane C-J Chao
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Revision of Sleeve Gastrectomy with Hiatal Repair with Gastropexy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Tien-Chou Soong; Owaid M Almalki; Wei-Jei Lee; Kong-Han Ser; Jung-Chien Chen; Chun-Chi Wu; Shu-Chun Chen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  The association between body mass index and all-cause mortality in Japanese patients with incident hemodialysis.

Authors:  Koji Inagaki; Naoto Tawada; Masahiro Takanashi; Toshiyuki Akahori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Healthy Taiwanese Eating Approach (TEA) toward Total Wellbeing and Healthy Longevity.

Authors:  Wen-Harn Pan; Szu-Yun Wu; Nai-Hua Yeh; Shu-Yi Hung
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.706

6.  Ten Years of Change in Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery in the Asia-Pacific Region with COVID-19 Pandemic: IFSO-APC National Reports 2021.

Authors:  Masayuki Ohta; Soo Min Ahn; Yosuke Seki; Wah Yang; Simon Kin-Hung Wong; Suthep Udomsawaengsup; Jeffrey M Hamdorf; Manish Khaitan; Nik Ritza Kosai; Weu Wang; June Lee; Reno Rudiman; Thejana Wijeratne; Edward Oliveros; Cunchuan Wang; Kazunori Kasama
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.479

7.  InVestiGation of the Association of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior with tHe Occurrence of Future Cardiovascular Disease and Long Term Outcome in General Population Using the HEALTHCARE Database (VGH-HEALTHCARE).

Authors:  Hung-Chou Yang; Ying Liang; Hsiu-Chuan Hsu; Jiah-Hwang Shu; Ruey-Hsing Chou; Pai-Feng Hsu; Yuan-Jen Wang; Yaw-Zon Ding; Teh-Ling Liou; Ying-Wen Wang; Shao-Sung Huang; Chung-Chi Lin; Tse-Min Lu; Hsin-Bang Leu; Wan-Leong Chan; Shing-Jong Lin
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.672

8.  Benefits of different intensity of aerobic exercise in modulating body composition among obese young adults: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chih-Hui Chiu; Ming-Chen Ko; Long-Shan Wu; Ding-Peng Yeh; Nai-Wen Kan; Po-Fu Lee; Jenn-Woei Hsieh; Ching-Yu Tseng; Chien-Chang Ho
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Impact of Misclassification of Obesity by Body Mass Index on Mortality in Patients With CKD.

Authors:  Ting-Yun Lin; Paik-Seong Lim; Szu-Chun Hung
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2017-12-23

10.  A retrospective study on sex difference in patients with urolithiasis: who is more vulnerable to chronic kidney disease?

Authors:  Tsu-Ming Chien; Yen-Man Lu; Ching-Chia Li; Wen-Jeng Wu; Hsueh-Wei Chang; Yii-Her Chou
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.