| Literature DB >> 28152059 |
Heng-Cheng Chang1,2, Hsin-Chou Yang3, Hsing-Yi Chang4, Chih-Jung Yeh5, Hsin-Hung Chen6, Kuo-Chin Huang7, Wen-Harn Pan1,2,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Obesity is one of the most important public health issues worldwide. Moreover, an extreme phenotype, morbid obesity (MO) has insidiously become a global problem. Therefore, we aimed to document the prevalence trend and to unveil the epidemiological characteristics of MO in Taiwan.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28152059 PMCID: PMC5289420 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The BMI distribution (proportions of underweight, normal weight, overweight, and several obesity classes) and median dietary pattern score by surveys.
Socio-demographic, lifestyle characteristics of the normal weight and the morbid obesity groups.
| Normal Weight | Morbid Obesity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 156 | n = 39 | ||||
| BMI | 21.5 | 1.6 | 39 | 2.9 | |
| Age (Years) | 36 | 13.2 | 35.9 | 13.4 | |
| 19–30 years (%) | 51.3 | 51.3 | |||
| 30–50 years (%) | 25.6 | 25.6 | |||
| 50–65 years (%) | 23.1 | 23.1 | |||
| Gender | |||||
| Female (%) | 66.7 | 66.7 | |||
| Male (%) | 33.3 | 33.3 | |||
| Education | |||||
| Elementary school (%) | 9.6 | 20.5 | 0.0247‡ | ||
| High schools (%) | 43 | 53.9 | |||
| University or above (%) | 47.4 | 25.6 | |||
| Occupation | |||||
| Blue Collar (%) | 55.2 | 72.7 | 0.1376‡ | ||
| Low level manager (%) | 16.9 | 6.1 | |||
| High level manager (%) | 27.9 | 21.2 | |||
| Socioeconomic Level | |||||
| Low (%) | 36 | 57.6 | 0.0760‡ | ||
| Middle (%) | 38.2 | 24.2 | |||
| High (%) | 25.7 | 18.2 | |||
| Personal Income per month | |||||
| Under 30,000 NTD (%) | 52.6 | 73.7 | 0.0188‡ | ||
| Above 30,000 NTD (%) | 47.4 | 26.3 | |||
| Marriage Status | |||||
| Single (%) | 43.6 | 41 | 0.7135‡ | ||
| Married (%) | 48.1 | 53.9 | |||
| Divorced/Widow(er)s (%) | 8.3 | 5.1 | |||
| Physical Activity (MET-Minutes) | 900 | (300–2157.5) | 397.5 | (0.0–1350.0) | 0.0084† |
| Under 450 MET-Minutes Per Weeks (%) | 30.8 | 56.4 | 0.0028‡ | ||
| Sleeping duration (hours) | 7.7 | (7.0–8.3) | 7.7 | (6.4–8.5) | 0.9060† |
| Under 7 hours (%) | 25 | 35.9 | 0.1712‡ | ||
| Above 7 hours (%) | 75 | 64.1 | |||
| Smoking | |||||
| Never (%) | 58 | 40.9 | 0.3281‡ | ||
| Ex-smoker (%) | 13.6 | 22.7 | |||
| Current (%) | 28.4 | 36.4 | |||
| Alcohol Drinking | |||||
| Never (%) | 47.2 | 46.2 | 0.9583‡ | ||
| Ex-drinker (%) | 2.8 | 3.9 | |||
| Current (%) | 50 | 50 | |||
| Betel Nut Chewing | |||||
| Never (%) | 94.2 | 81.1 | 0.0138‡ | ||
| Ex-chewer (%) | 3.2 | 5.4 | |||
| Current (%) | 2.6 | 13.5 | |||
a BMI: body mass index.
b Mean (SD) for age and BMI; Median and interquartile range (25th -75th percentile) or %.
c The case and control group were compared with either Mann-Whitney U test(†) or Chi-square test(‡).
Median total caloric intake and nutrient intake levels per 2000 calories by weight status (normal weight vs morbid obesity).
| Characteristics | Normal Weight | Morbid Obesity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 156 | n = 39 | ||||
| Calorie (kcal/day) | 1917.6 | (1397.2–2511.0) | 2111.5 | (1489.5–2617.2) | 0.4352 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 263.3 | (226.8–297.9) | 236.3 | (195.3–272.8) | 0.0091 |
| Protein (g) | 81.0 | (67.8–95.3) | 84.1 | (62.9–94.4) | 0.7887 |
| Fat (g) | 69.0 | (56.1–81.3) | 80.1 | (66.8–97.8) | 0.0009 |
| Cholesterol (mg) | 297.9 | (147.7–466.5) | 385.0 | (135.1–479.2) | 0.2974 |
| Dietary fiber (g) | 16.6 | (10.8–23.7) | 12.8 | (7.9–21.7) | 0.0337 |
| Vit. B1 (mg) | 1.1 | (0.8–1.6) | 1.2 | (0.9–1.6) | 0.2166 |
| Vit. B2 (mg) | 1.2 | (0.9–1.6) | 1.1 | (0.8–1.5) | 0.4342 |
| Nicotinic acid (mg) | 18.3 | (13.2–23.6) | 19.2 | (15.3–24.3) | 0.3839 |
| Vit. B6 (mg) | 1.7 | (1.3–2.4) | 1.8 | (1.3–2.2) | 0.9078 |
| Vit. B12 (μg) | 3.1 | (1.9–6.2) | 3.1 | (2.1–6.2) | 0.7236 |
| Vit. C (mg) | 125.2 | (59.5–223.6) | 125.7 | (40.5–252.0) | 0.9507 |
| Vit. A (ug) | 579.1 | (333.7–1039.0) | 629.8 | (306.5–1243.9) | 0.9456 |
| Vit. D (μg) | 3.6 | (1.8–7.5) | 3.2 | (1.3–9.1) | 0.3815 |
| Vit. E (mg) | 8.2 | (5.9–10.7) | 8.5 | (5.8–10.6) | 0.6650 |
| Na (g) | 3.6 | (2.7–4.5) | 4.0 | (2.8–5.7) | 0.1854 |
| K (g) | 2.5 | (1.9–3.4) | 2.4 | (1.9–3.1) | 0.3961 |
| Mg (mg) | 281.4 | (205.8–350.8) | 254.1 | (195.2–324.1) | 0.3278 |
| Ca (mg) | 471.7 | (311.3–749.0) | 410.1 | (203.1–548.9) | 0.0271 |
| P (mg) | 1131.3 | (958.7–1455.8) | 1119.7 | (914.7–1247.1) | 0.1060 |
| Zn (mg) | 10.4 | (8.3–13.1) | 10.1 | (8.4–13.3) | 0.8280 |
| Fe (mg) | 14.2 | (10.7–18.3) | 13.3 | (9.8–17.0) | 0.3093 |
a BMI: body mass index; Vit.: vitamin; Na: sodium; K: potassium; Mg: magnesium; Ca: calcium; P: phosphorus; Zn: zinc; Fe: iron.
b Median and interquartile range (25th - 75th percentile).
c The case and control group were compared with Mann-Whitney U test.
Food items with high absolute loading values discovered by RRR analysis, correlation coefficients between food frequency and dietary pattern score, and median food frequency by weight status.
| Food item | RRR | Median food intake frequency per month | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading value | Correlation coefficient | Normal Weight (18.5≤BMI<24) n = 156 | Morbid Obesity (BMI≥35) n = 39 | P | |
| Ice pop, candy, sweetened beverage | 0.42 | 0.68 | 5.0 | 8.2 | 0.1562 |
| Red meat | 0.24 | 0.30 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 0.0726 |
| Processed seafood & meat products | 0.17 | 0.28 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.4697 |
| Tea & Coffee (no sugar) | -0.16 | -0.38 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.2049 |
| Breakfast cereals | -0.20 | -0.28 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2237 |
| Milk, Yogurt, Cheese | -0.28 | -0.41 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.1124 |
| Nuts | -0.35 | -0.25 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0209 |
| Fresh fruit & 100% juice | -0.36 | -0.52 | 5.2 | 3.7 | 0.0345 |
a The factor loading was calculated by reduced rank regression (RRR).
b The correlation coefficient between food frequency and dietary pattern score was calculated by Spearman correlation.
*P-value <0.05;
**P-value <0.001;
***P-value <0.0001
c The case and control group were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test.
The Odds ratio of quartiles of dietary pattern score to morbid obesity.
| Univariate | Model 1. | Model 2. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Dietary pattern scores | ||||||
| Q1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||
| Q2 | 0.9 | (0.2–4.6) | 0.9 | (0.2–4.7) | 0.8 | (0.1–4.0) |
| Q3 | 5.4 | (1.5–20.1) | 4.7 | (1.2–17.9) | 3.9 | (1.0–15.6) |
| Q4 | 6.7 | (1.8–24.8) | 5.8 | (1.5–22.2) | 4.7 | (1.2–19.0) |
| Physical Activity | ||||||
| MET-Minutes per week<450 | 2.8 | (1.3–6.0) | 2.1 | (1.0–4.8) | 1.9 | (0.8–4.5) |
| 450≦MET-Minutes per week | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||
| Education level | ||||||
| Elementary school | 6.9 | (1.8–26.2) | 4.0 | (0.9–17.6) | ||
| High schools | 2.1 | (0.9–5.0) | 1.7 | (0.7–4.3) | ||
| University or above | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| Personal income | ||||||
| Under 30,000 NTD | 3.0 | (1.2–7.2) | 2.2 | (0.8–5.9) | ||
| Above 30,000 NTD | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| p for trend of dietary pattern scores | 0.0008 | 0.0025 | 0.0071 | |||
Total N = 175. 16 subjects (12 controls and 4 cases) were excluded due to missing values on FFQ.
a The dietary pattern score was the weighted sum of food frequencies, weighted by loading factors generated from RRR.
Univariate: age and sex-controlled. Model 1: dietary pattern scores and physical activity controlled for age and sex. Model 2: Model 1 adjusted further for education level, and personal income.