| Literature DB >> 26393646 |
Long Shu1, Pei-Fen Zheng2,3, Xiao-Yan Zhang4, Cai-Juan Si5, Xiao-Long Yu6, Wei Gao7, Lun Zhang8, Dan Liao9.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: No previous study has investigated dietary pattern in association with obesity risk in a middle-aged Chinese population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between dietary patterns and the risk of obesity in the city of Hangzhou, the capital of Zhejiang Province, east China. In this cross-sectional study of 2560 subjects aged 45-60 years, dietary intakes were evaluated using a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). All anthropometric measurements were obtained using standardized procedures. The partial correlation analysis was performed to assess the associations between dietary patterns and body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist to hip ratio (WHR). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine the associations between dietary patterns and obesity, with adjustment for potential confounders. Four major dietary patterns were extracted by means of factor analysis: animal food, traditional Chinese, western fast-food, and high-salt patterns. The animal food pattern was positively associated with BMI (r = 0.082, 0.144, respectively, p < 0.05) and WC (r = 0.102, 0.132, respectively, p < 0.01), and the traditional Chinese pattern was inversely associated with BMI (r = -0.047, -0.116, respectively, p < 0.05) and WC (r = -0.067, -0.113, respectively, p < 0.05) in both genders. After controlling for potential confounders, subjects in the highest quartile of animal food pattern scores had a greater odds ratio for abdominal obesity (odds ratio (OR) = 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.188-2.340; p < 0.01), in comparison to those from the lowest quartile. Compared with the lowest quartile of the traditional Chinese pattern, the highest quartile had a lower odds ratio for abdominal obesity (OR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.441-0.901, p < 0.05).Entities:
Keywords: China; cross-sectional study; dietary patterns; factor analysis; obesity
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26393646 PMCID: PMC4586571 DOI: 10.3390/nu7095376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Factor-loading matrix for major dietary patterns among 2560 Chinese adults aged 45–60 years *.
| Food Groups | Dietary Patterns | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animal Food | Traditional Chinese | Western Fast-Food | High-Salt | |
| Rice | 0.476 | 0.560 | - | - |
| Steamed bun/noodles | - | 0.411 | - | - |
| Coarse grains | - | 0.544 | - | - |
| Tubers | - | 0.535 | - | - |
| Fresh vegetables and fruits | - | 0.540 | - | - |
| Pickled vegetables | - | - | - | 0.561 |
| Mushroom | 0.462 | - | - | - |
| Red meat | 0.650 | - | - | - |
| Processed and cooked meat | - | - | - | 0.517 |
| Fish and shrimp | 0.599 | 0.530 | - | - |
| Seafood | 0.568 | - | - | - |
| Bacon and salted fish | - | - | - | 0.601 |
| Miscellaneous bean | - | 0.535 | - | - |
| Bean sauce | - | - | - | 0.436 |
| Fats/oils | 0.402 | - | - | - |
| Fast foods | - | - | 0.467 | - |
| Snacks | - | - | 0.456 | - |
| Chocolates | - | - | 0.485 | - |
| Coffee | - | - | 0.450 | - |
| Drinks | - | - | 0.561 | - |
| Tea | - | 0.438 | - | |
| Variance of intake explained (%) | 7.5 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 6.0 |
* Absolute values < 0.4 were excluded for simplicity.
Characteristics of the study participants by quartile (Q) categories of dietary pattern scores in the Hangzhou.
| Animal Food | * | Traditional Chinese | * | Western Fast-Food | * | High-Salt | * | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 ( | Q4 ( | Q1 ( | Q4 ( | Q1 ( | Q4 ( | Q1 ( | Q4 ( | |||||
| Age (year) | 51.8 ± 0.3 | 50.3 ± 0.2 | 50.0 ± 0.2 | 51.9 ± 0.3 | 51.5 ± 0.2 | 49.7 ± 0.2 | 50.7 ± 0.2 | 51.0 ± 0.2 | 0.789 | |||
| Gender (%) | ||||||||||||
| Male | 328(51.2) | 454(70.9) | 543(84.8) | 208(32.5) | 433(67.6) | 336(52.5) | 323(50.5) | 413(64.5) | ||||
| Female | 312(48.8) | 186(29.1) | 97(15.2) | 432(67.5) | 207(32.4) | 304(47.5) | 317(49.5) | 227(35.5) | ||||
| Obesity (%) | 65(10.1) | 108(16.8) | 113(17.6) | 53(8.3) | 99(15.5) | 68(10.7) | 79(12.3) | 95(14.9) | 0.374 | |||
| Abdominal obesity (%) | 215(33.6) | 258(40.3) | 254(39.7) | 211(33.0) | 248(38.8) | 229(35.8) | 0.149 | 225(35.2) | 232(36.3) | 0.600 | ||
| Hypertension (%) | 196(30.7) | 223(34.9) | 0.213 | 261(40.8) | 176(27.5) | 210(32.8) | 162(25.3) | 171(26.7) | 215(33.6) | |||
| Smoking status (%) | 0.708 | |||||||||||
| Current | 121(18.9) | 253(39.5) | 319(49.9) | 68(10.7) | 176(27.5) | 184(28.8) | 148(23.2) | 195(30.4) | ||||
| Former | 7(1.1) | 11(1.7) | 5(0.8) | 5(0.8) | 4(0.6) | 6(0.9) | 6(0.9) | 7(1.1) | ||||
| Never | 512(80.0) | 376(58.8) | 316(49.3) | 567(88.5) | 460(71.9) | 450(70.3) | 486(75.9) | 438(68.5) | ||||
| Education level (%) | 0.551 | 0.588 | ||||||||||
| <High school | 230(36.0) | 91(14.2) | 162(25.3) | 143(22.4) | 152(23.7) | 133(20.8) | 116(18.1) | 177(27.7) | ||||
| High school | 222(34.7) | 172(26.9) | 200(31.2) | 196(30.7) | 191(29.9) | 191(29.9) | 189(29.6) | 203(31.7) | ||||
| >High school | 188(29.3) | 377(58.9) | 278(43.5) | 301(46.9) | 297(46.4) | 316(49.3) | 335(52.3) | 260(40.6) | ||||
| Average monthly income per person (%) | ||||||||||||
| ≤2000 (RMB) | 261(40.8) | 111(17.3) | 218(34.1) | 160(25.0) | 207(32.4) | 141(22.1) | 123(19.2) | 225(35.2) | ||||
| 2000-3000 (RMB) | 268(41.9) | 244(38.1) | 257(40.1) | 245(38.3) | 269(42.1) | 219(34.2) | 244(38.2) | 253(39.5) | ||||
| >3000 (RMB) | 111(17.3) | 285(44.6) | 165(25.8) | 235(36.7) | 164(25.5) | 280(43.7) | 273(42.6) | 162(25.3) | ||||
| Physical activity (%) | 0.116 | 0.550 | 0.346 | |||||||||
| Light | 452(70.7) | 568(88.8) | 506(79.1) | 535(83.6) | 517(80.8) | 532(83.1) | 543(84.8) | 516(80.7) | ||||
| Moderate | 143(22.3) | 66(10.3) | 106(16.6) | 95(14.9) | 103(16.1) | 96(15.0) | 76(11.9) | 102(15.9) | ||||
| Vigorous | 45(7.0) | 6(0.9) | 28(4.3) | 10(1.5) | 20(3.1) | 12(1.9) | 21(3.3) | 22(3.4) | ||||
| Total energy intake (Kcal/day) | 1707.1 ± 254.8 | 1757.6 ± 289.1 | 0.457 | 1830.6 ± 323.5 | 1631.6 ± 224.2 | 1738.4 ± 269.7 | 1724.5 ± 311.8 | 0.513 | 1620.7 ± 224.8 | 1840.2 ± 320.0 | ||
Categorical variables are presented as sum and percentages, and continuous variables are presented as Mean ± standard deviation (SD). * p values for continuous variables (analysis of variance) and for categorical variables (chi-square test). Quartiles of dietary pattern score are presented by Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, n = 640. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Monthly income per person (RMB) was presented as mean.
Analysis of covariance model to evaluate the difference of BMI, WC, and WHR by quartile (Q) categories of dietary pattern scores.
| BMI (kg/m2) | WHR | WC (cm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animal food pattern | ||||||
| Q1 ( | 24.27 ± 2.81 | 0.87 ± 0.08 | 0.533 | 84.02 ± 8.68 | ||
| Q4 ( | 25.10 ± 3.12 | 0.89 ± 0.06 | 87.35 ± 9.04 | |||
| Traditional Chinese pattern | ||||||
| Q1 ( | 25.13 ± 2.95 | 0.89 ± 0.06 | 87.78 ± 8.90 | |||
| Q4 ( | 24.01 ± 2.76 | 0.86 ± 0.08 | 82.63 ± 8.45 | |||
| Western fast-food pattern | ||||||
| Q1 ( | 24.93 ± 3.00 | 0.217 | 0.89 ± 0.07 | 0.078 | 86.97 ± 8.58 | 0.193 |
| Q4 ( | 24.43 ± 2.93 | 0.87 ± 0.06 | 84.85 ± 8.91 | |||
| High-salt pattern | ||||||
| Q1 ( | 24.40 ± 3.11 | 0.259 | 0.87 ± 0.06 | 0.986 | 84.79 ± 9.63 | 0.777 |
| Q4 ( | 24.83 ± 2.96 | 0.88 ± 0.06 | 85.98 ± 8.61 |
Adjusted for gender, age, physical activity, smoking status, economic income, educational level, and total energy intake. Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist hip rate; WC, waist circumference. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; Q4: the highest quartile of dietary patterns, Q1: the lowest quartile of dietary.
Partial correlation analysis for the relationship between dietary pattern score and BMI, WC, and WHR.
| BMI (kg/m2) | WC (cm) | WHR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animal food pattern | ||||||
| Males | 0.082 | 0.102 | 0.055 | 0.261 | ||
| Females | 0.144 | 0.132 | 0.024 | 0.637 | ||
| Traditional Chinese pattern | ||||||
| Males | −0.047 | −0.067 | −0.062 | |||
| Females | −0.116 | −0.113 | −0.007 | 0.826 | ||
| Western fast-food pattern | ||||||
| Males | −0.031 | 0.318 | −0.022 | 0.344 | −0.013 | 0.711 |
| Females | −0.023 | 0.649 | −0.046 | 0.360 | −0.078 | 0.120 |
| High-salt pattern | ||||||
| Males | 0.002 | 0.945 | 0.008 | 0.806 | 0.027 | 0.517 |
| Females | 0.104 | 0.024 | 0.632 | 0.019 | 0.807 |
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist to hip ratio. Adjusted for age, smoking status, economic; income, educational level, physical activity level, and total energy intake.
Multivariate adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for abdominal obesity across quartile (Q) categories of dietary patterns scores.
| Animal Food Pattern Score | Traditional Chinese pattern Score | Western Fast-Food Pattern Score | High-Salt Pattern Score | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q4 | Q1 | Q4 | Q1 | Q4 | Q1 | Q4 | |||||
| Abdominal obesity | ||||||||||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.55 (1.144, 2.107) | 0.005 | 1.00 | 0.68 (0.488, 0.936) | 0.018 | 1.00 | 0.85 (0.628, 1.153) | 0.297 | 1.00 | 1.03 (0.764, 1.382) | 0.856 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.67 (1.191, 2.345) | 0.003 | 1.00 | 0.63 (0.438, 0.891) | 0.009 | 1.00 | 0.88 (0.541, 1.143) | 0.358 | 1.00 | 0.98 (0.705, 1.352) | 0.886 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.67 (1.188, 2.340) | 0.003 | 1.00 | 0.63 (0.441, 0.901) | 0.011 | 1.00 | 0.88 (0.625, 1.225) | 0.437 | 1.00 | 0.94 (0.673, 1.320) | 0.731 |
Model 1: adjusted for sex and age; Model 2: further adjusted for physical activity level; Model 3: additionally adjusted for total energy intake. Q4: the highest quartile of dietary patterns, Q1: the lowest quartile of dietary patterns; CI: confidence interval.