Literature DB >> 28151092

Perfusion alters stiffness of deep gray matter.

Stefan Hetzer1,2, Patric Birr3, Andreas Fehlner3, Sebastian Hirsch4, Florian Dittmann3, Eric Barnhill3, Jürgen Braun4, Ingolf Sack3.   

Abstract

Viscoelastic properties of the brain reflect tissue architecture at multiple length scales. However, little is known about the relation between vital tissue functions, such as perfusion, and the macroscopic mechanical properties of cerebral tissue. In this study, arterial spin labelling is paired with magnetic resonance elastography to investigate the relationship between tissue stiffness and cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the in vivo human brain. The viscoelastic modulus, | G*|, and CBF were studied in deep gray matter (DGM) of 14 healthy male volunteers in the following sub-regions: putamen, nucleus accumbens, hippocampus, thalamus, globus pallidus, and amygdala. CBF was further normalized by vessel area data to obtain the flux rate q which is proportional to the perfusion pressure gradient. The striatum (represented by putamen and nucleus accumbens) was distinct from the other DGM regions by displaying markedly higher stiffness and perfusion values. q was a predictive marker for DGM stiffness as analyzed by linear regression | G*| =  q·(4.2 ± 0.6)kPa·s + (0.80 ± 0.06)kPa ( R2 = 0.92, P = 0.006). These results suggest a high sensitivity of MRE in DGM to perfusion pressure. The distinct mechano-vascular properties of striatum tissue, as compared to the rest of DGM, may reflect elevated perfusion pressure, which could explain the well-known susceptibility of the putamen to hemorrhages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASL; Deep gray matter; MRE; elasticity; mechanical properties; perfusion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28151092      PMCID: PMC5757437          DOI: 10.1177/0271678X17691530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab        ISSN: 0271-678X            Impact factor:   6.200


  57 in total

1.  Coupling between elastic strain and interstitial fluid flow: ramifications for poroelastic imaging.

Authors:  Ricardo Leiderman; Paul E Barbone; Assad A Oberai; Jeffrey C Bamber
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Empirical optimization of ASL data analysis using an ASL data processing toolbox: ASLtbx.

Authors:  Ze Wang; Geoffrey K Aguirre; Hengyi Rao; Jiongjiong Wang; María A Fernández-Seara; Anna R Childress; John A Detre
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Measurement of the hyperelastic properties of ex vivo brain tissue slices.

Authors:  T Kaster; I Sack; A Samani
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Increasing the spatial resolution and sensitivity of magnetic resonance elastography by correcting for subject motion and susceptibility-induced image distortions.

Authors:  Andreas Fehlner; Sebastian Hirsch; Martin Weygandt; Thomas Christophel; Eric Barnhill; Mykola Kadobianskyi; Jürgen Braun; Johannes Bernarding; Ralf Lützkendorf; Ingolf Sack; Stefan Hetzer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Measuring the effects of aging and sex on regional brain stiffness with MR elastography in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Arvin Arani; Matthew C Murphy; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; David S Lake; Scott A Kruse; Clifford R Jack; Richard L Ehman; John Huston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Quantification of venous vessel size in human brain in response to hypercapnia and hyperoxia using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yuji Shen; Ida M Pu; Trevor Ahearn; Matthew Clemence; Christian Schwarzbauer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The role of neural impulse control mechanisms for dietary success in obesity.

Authors:  Martin Weygandt; Knut Mai; Esther Dommes; Verena Leupelt; Kerstin Hackmack; Thorsten Kahnt; Yvonne Rothemund; Joachim Spranger; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The pulsating brain: A review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility.

Authors:  Mark E Wagshul; Per K Eide; Joseph R Madsen
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2011-01-18

9.  Measuring the characteristic topography of brain stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Matthew C Murphy; John Huston; Clifford R Jack; Kevin J Glaser; Matthew L Senjem; Jun Chen; Armando Manduca; Joel P Felmlee; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High-resolution mechanical imaging of glioblastoma by multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Kaspar-Josche Streitberger; Martin Reiss-Zimmermann; Florian Baptist Freimann; Simon Bayerl; Jing Guo; Felix Arlt; Jens Wuerfel; Jürgen Braun; Karl-Titus Hoffmann; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

1.  Double dissociation of structure-function relationships in memory and fluid intelligence observed with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Hillary Schwarb; Kevin M Horecka; Matthew D J McGarry; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer; Neal J Cohen; Aron K Barbey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Cardiac-gated steady-state multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography of the brain: Effect of cerebral arterial pulsation on brain viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Felix Schrank; Carsten Warmuth; Heiko Tzschätzsch; Bernhard Kreft; Sebastian Hirsch; Jürgen Braun; Thomas Elgeti; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Imaging brain function with simultaneous BOLD and viscoelasticity contrast: fMRI/fMRE.

Authors:  Patricia S Lan; Kevin J Glaser; Richard L Ehman; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Cerebral blood flow in dystonia due to pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Peter Stoeter; Pedro Roa-Sanchez; Cesar F Gonzalez; Herwin Speckter; Jairo Oviedo; Pamela Bido
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-08-27

Review 5.  Biomechanical simulation of traumatic brain injury in the rat.

Authors:  John D Finan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 6.  Stiffness and Beyond: What MR Elastography Can Tell Us About Brain Structure and Function Under Physiologic and Pathologic Conditions.

Authors:  Ziying Yin; Anthony J Romano; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; John Huston
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

Review 7.  MR elastography of the brain and its application in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Matthew C Murphy; John Huston; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Magnetic resonance elastography-derived stiffness of the kidneys and its correlation with water perfusion.

Authors:  Deep Gandhi; Prateek Kalra; Brian Raterman; Xiaokui Mo; Huiming Dong; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Hypercapnia increases brain viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Stefan Hetzer; Florian Dittmann; Karl Bormann; Sebastian Hirsch; Axel Lipp; Danny Jj Wang; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Relationship between Shear Stiffness Measured by MR Elastography and Perfusion Metrics Measured by Perfusion CT of Meningiomas.

Authors:  T Takamura; U Motosugi; M Ogiwara; Y Sasaki; K J Glaser; R L Ehman; H Kinouchi; H Onishi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.