Literature DB >> 17148819

Coupling between elastic strain and interstitial fluid flow: ramifications for poroelastic imaging.

Ricardo Leiderman1, Paul E Barbone, Assad A Oberai, Jeffrey C Bamber.   

Abstract

We study the effects of interstitial fluid flow and interstitial fluid drainage on the spatio-temporal response of soft tissue strain. The motivation stems from the ability to measure in vivo strain distributions in soft tissue via elastography, and the desire to explore the possibility of using such techniques to investigate soft tissue fluid flow. Our study is based upon a mathematical model for soft tissue mechanics from the literature. It is a simple generalization of biphasic theory that includes coupling between the fluid and solid phases of the soft tissue, and crucially, fluid exchange between the interstitium and the local microvasculature. We solve the mathematical equations in two dimensions by the finite element method (FEM). The finite element implementation is validated against an exact analytical solution that is derived in the appendix. Realistic input tissue properties from the literature are used in conjunction with FEM modelling to conduct several computational experiments. The results of these lead to the following conclusions: (i) different hypothetical flow mechanisms lead to different patterns of strain relaxation with time; (ii) representative tissue properties show fluid drainage into the local microvasculature to be the dominant flow-related stress/strain relaxation mechanism; (iii) the relaxation time of strain in solid tumours due to drainage into the microvasculature is on the order of 5-10 s; (iv) under realistic applied pressure magnitudes, the magnitude of the strain relaxation can be as high as approximately 0.4% strain (4000 microstrains), which is well within the range of strains measurable by elastography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148819     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/24/002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Perfusion alters stiffness of deep gray matter.

Authors:  Stefan Hetzer; Patric Birr; Andreas Fehlner; Sebastian Hirsch; Florian Dittmann; Eric Barnhill; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 2.  Advances in Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver.

Authors:  Jiahui Li; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Meng Yin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  What challenges must be overcome before ultrasound elasticity imaging is ready for the clinic?

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2011-08

4.  Recent results in nonlinear strain and modulus imaging.

Authors:  Timothy J Hall; Paul Barbone; Assad A Oberai; Jingfeng Jiang; Jean Francois Dord; Sevan Goenezen; Ted G Fisher
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

5.  Estimation of Mechanical and Transport Parameters in Cancers Using Short Time Poroelastography.

Authors:  Sharmin Majumder; Md Tauhidul Islam; Raffaella Righetti
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2022-08-16

6.  Dynamic functional and mechanical response of breast tissue to compression.

Authors:  S A Carp; J Selb; Q Fang; R Moore; D B Kopans; E Rafferty; D A Boas
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Elastographic Assessment of Xenograft Pancreatic Tumors.

Authors:  Hexuan Wang; Michael D Nieskoski; Kayla Marra; Jason R Gunn; Stuart B Trembly; Brian W Pogue; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 8.  Biomechanics of oral mucosa.

Authors:  Junning Chen; Rohana Ahmad; Wei Li; Michael Swain; Qing Li
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.