Literature DB >> 27764537

Increasing the spatial resolution and sensitivity of magnetic resonance elastography by correcting for subject motion and susceptibility-induced image distortions.

Andreas Fehlner1, Sebastian Hirsch2, Martin Weygandt3,4, Thomas Christophel3,4, Eric Barnhill1, Mykola Kadobianskyi3,4, Jürgen Braun2, Johannes Bernarding5, Ralf Lützkendorf5, Ingolf Sack1, Stefan Hetzer3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To improve the resolution of elasticity maps by adapting motion and distortion correction methods for phase-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrasts such as magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), a technique for measuring mechanical tissue properties in vivo.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRE data of the brain were acquired with echo-planar imaging (EPI) at 3T (n = 14) and 7T (n = 18). Motion and distortion correction parameters were estimated using the magnitude images. The real and imaginary part of the complex MRE data were corrected separately and recombined. The width of the point-spread function (PSF) and the position variability were calculated. The images were normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) anatomical template. The gray-to-white matter separability of the elasticity maps was tested.
RESULTS: Motion correction sharpened the |G*| maps as demonstrated by a narrowing of the PSF by 0.78 ± 0.51 mm at 7T and 0.52 ± 0.63 mm at 3T. The amount of individual head motion during MRE acquisition correlated with the decrease in the width of the PSF at 7T (r = 0.53, P = 0.025) and at 3T (r = 0.69, P = 0.006) and with the increase of gray-to-white matter separability after motion correction at 7T (r = 0.64, P = 0.0039) and at 3T (r = 0.57, P = 0.0319). Improved spatial accuracy after distortion correction results in a significant increase in separability of gray and white matter stiffness (P = 0.0067), especially in inferior parts of the brain suffering from strong B0 inhomogeneities.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that our method leads to sharper images and higher spatial accuracy, raising the prospect of the investigation of smaller brain areas with increased sensitivity in studies using MRE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:134-141.
© 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR elastography; distortion correction; motion correction; multifrequency MRE; phase-based contrast

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27764537     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  11 in total

1.  Perfusion alters stiffness of deep gray matter.

Authors:  Stefan Hetzer; Patric Birr; Andreas Fehlner; Sebastian Hirsch; Florian Dittmann; Eric Barnhill; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Progressive supranuclear palsy and idiopathic Parkinson's disease are associated with local reduction of in vivo brain viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Axel Lipp; Cornelia Skowronek; Andreas Fehlner; Kaspar-Josche Streitberger; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Quantitative effects of off-resonance related distortion on brain mechanical property estimation with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Grace McIlvain; Matthew D J McGarry; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 4.  Utility of preoperative meningioma consistency measurement with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE): a review.

Authors:  Alexander G Chartrain; Mehmet Kurt; Amy Yao; Rui Feng; Kambiz Nael; J Mocco; Joshua B Bederson; Priti Balchandani; Raj K Shrivastava
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Stiffness and Beyond: What MR Elastography Can Tell Us About Brain Structure and Function Under Physiologic and Pathologic Conditions.

Authors:  Ziying Yin; Anthony J Romano; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; John Huston
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

6.  Hypercapnia increases brain viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Stefan Hetzer; Florian Dittmann; Karl Bormann; Sebastian Hirsch; Axel Lipp; Danny Jj Wang; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Combining viscoelasticity, diffusivity and volume of the hippocampus for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Lea M Gerischer; Andreas Fehlner; Theresa Köbe; Kristin Prehn; Daria Antonenko; Ulrike Grittner; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack; Agnes Flöel
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance elastography for examining developmental changes in the mechanical properties of the brain.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Eva H Telzer
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  Simultaneous multislice rapid magnetic resonance elastography of the liver.

Authors:  Waqas Majeed; Prateek Kalra; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.478

10.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model.

Authors:  Katharina Schregel; Michal O Nowicki; Miklos Palotai; Navid Nazari; Rachel Zane; Ralph Sinkus; Sean E Lawler; Samuel Patz
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.