Literature DB >> 28149661

Biomechanical podiatric evaluation in an Italian cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis: A pilot study.

Susanna Maddali Bongi1, Giovanni Ravenni1, Benedetta Ciampi1, Angela Del Rosso1, Khadija El Aoufy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Foot problems are often present in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients, however studies regarding podiatric problems related to SSc are lacking and there are no data evaluating the foot biomechanical changes. The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate podiatric problems in an Italian cohort of SSc patients by assessing received podiatric services, foot pain and disability and biomechanical foot deformity.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 25 consecutive SSc patients were enrolled from the Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence. All SSc patients were assessed by: Standards of Care for People with Foot Musculoskeletal Health problems: Audit Tool, Foot Function Index (FFI), Weight and non-weight bearing foot joint assessment, (Foot Posture Index (FPI) and Gait Cycle), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 36 (SF-36).
RESULTS: Audit Tool - Only 7 (28%) out of the 25 patients with SSc had a specific podiatric assessment and treatment: no patient received a foot health assessment within the first 6 months of disease diagnosis and no patient received information about foot involvement. 1 patient (4%) received foot assessment every year; 1 patient (4%) received specific information about the disease and 5 patients (20%) received information about the benefits of using adapted footwear and insoles. FFI - Values of pain, disability and activity limitations, reported in FFI, are 4.7±5.1, 5.1±3.2 and 3.2±3.1 (M±DS), respectively. Non-weight bearing foot joint assessment shows a rearfoot varus deformity in 64% of patients, forefoot varus deformity in 42% and 6% forefoot valgus deformity. Weight bearing foot joint assessment, through FPI shows a pronated foot 20% of patients with and 34% with highly pronated overall foot posture. Gait analysis shows that 64% of patients has a contact of the calcaneus in invertion while 36% in eversion. In the midstance, 78% have the foot in pronation and 22% in supination, while in propulsion 12% presents a takeoff of the foot in supination and 88% in the pronation. HAQ result is 1.13±0.80, SFI and SMI scales of SF-36 have scores of 32.38±10.65 and 38.67±11.40, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our results shows that podiatric problems in SSc patients are common, serious but foot assessment and health care are inadequate. Thus, foot health information should be improved in order to better empower patients to self-manage low risk problems and help identify high-risk problems, which require specialist care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feet; foot thealth services; podiatry; scleroderma; standards of care; systemic slerosis

Year:  2016        PMID: 28149661      PMCID: PMC5283565          DOI: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2016.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol        ISSN: 2147-9720


  26 in total

1.  The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability.

Authors:  E Budiman-Mak; K J Conrad; K E Roach
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the Foot Posture Index.

Authors:  Anthony C Redmond; Jack Crosbie; Robert A Ouvrier
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Foot deformities in rheumatoid arthritis and relevance of foot function index.

Authors:  Ajda Bal; Ece Aydog; Sedat Tolga Aydog; Aytul Cakci
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Foot problems in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  H Sari-Kouzel; C E Hutchinson; A Middleton; F Webb; T Moore; K Griffin; A L Herrick
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Management of leg ulcers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or systemic sclerosis: the importance of concomitant arterial and venous disease.

Authors:  J Hafner; E Schneider; G Burg; P C Cassina
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Disability in systemic sclerosis -- a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Mireille Schnitzer; Marie Hudson; Murray Baron; Russell Steele
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1980-05

Review 8.  Vascular complications of scleroderma.

Authors:  Serena Guiducci; Roberto Giacomelli; Marco Matucci Cerinic
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 9.754

9.  Health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis as measured by the Short Form 36: relationship with clinical and biologic markers.

Authors:  Angela Del Rosso; Maura Boldrini; David D'Agostino; Giovanni Plinio Augusto Placidi; Alessandra Scarpato; Alberto Pignone; Sergio Generini; Yrio Konttinen; Massimo Zoppi; Tonko Vlak; Gianfranco Placidi; Marco Matucci-Cerinic
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-06-15

10.  The subtalar joint axis palpation technique part 2: reliability and validity results using cadaver feet.

Authors:  Ken K Van Alsenoy; Kristiaan D'Août; Evie E Vereecke; Joris De Schepper; Derek Santos
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2014-07
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Exercise as a multi-modal disease-modifying medicine in systemic sclerosis: An introduction by The Global Fellowship on Rehabilitation and Exercise in Systemic Sclerosis (G-FoRSS).

Authors:  Henrik Pettersson; Helene Alexanderson; Janet L Poole; Janos Varga; Malin Regardt; Anne-Marie Russell; Yasser Salam; Kelly Jensen; Jennifer Mansour; Tracy Frech; Carol Feghali-Bostwick; Cecília Varjú; Nancy Baldwin; Matty Heenan; Kim Fligelstone; Monica Holmner; Matthew R Lammi; Mary Beth Scholand; Lee Shapiro; Elizabeth R Volkmann; Lesley Ann Saketkoo
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.991

2.  Pedobarographic Measurements of Rheumatoid Feet Compared with Clinical Parameters.

Authors:  Yasemin Yumusakhuylu; Bilinc Dogruoz Karatekin; Selin Turan Turgut; Afitap Icagasioglu; Esra Selimoglu; Sadiye Murat; Esen Kasapoglu; Bekir Turgut
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2022-03-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.