| Literature DB >> 28149173 |
Andreza G R Barbosa1, Cicera D M Oliveira1, Luiz J Lacerda-Neto1, Cinara S Vidal1, Rogério de A Saraiva1, José G M da Costa2, Henrique D M Coutinho3, Hericka B F Galvao4, Irwin R A de Menezes1.
Abstract
Evaluations of the therapeutic potential of medicinal plants and their components have been the subject of many studies. Furthermore, the biological activities of various plant species have been reported in various pieces of literature. Hyptis martiusii Benth (Lamiaceae), popularly known as "mad balm" is commonly found in the North, Southeast, and Northeast of Brazil. Its leaves are used ethnobiologically as antiulcerogenic, antimicrobial, antitumor and as insecticide. This study aimed to analyze the chemical composition of the essential oil of H. martiusii Benth (OEHM) by GC/MS as well as its possible topical activity as an antiedematogenic. This is verified by the models of ear edema induced by single (acute edema) and multiple (chronic edema) applications of croton oil topically, and systemically verified through the model of paw edema induced by carrageenan 1%. Doses of 50, 75 and 100 mg/kg OEHM were used in all tests. Chemical analysis of the oil revealed the 1,8-cineole (34.58%) and δ-carene (21:58%) as major components present in the essential oil. On the model of ear edema, acute and chronic OEHM in all the tested doses showed no significant antiedematogenic activity (p < 0.05). The systemic model of paw edema induced by carrageenin showed that a dose of 100 mg/kg effectively reduced swelling by 55.37% in the second hour evaluation when compared to the saline group. The anti-inflammatory systemic effect can give greater bioavailability of the components present in the essential oil and your interference in cytokines and leukotriene, thromboxane and prostaglandin biosynthesis. It is therefore concluded that OEHM presents systemic antiedematogenic activity but not topical activity at these doses.Entities:
Keywords: 1,8 cineole; Antiedematogenic activity; Antiinflammatory effect; Essential oil; Hyptis martiusii; Natural products
Year: 2015 PMID: 28149173 PMCID: PMC5272940 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.10.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Chemical composition of the essential oil of H. martiusii.
| Components | Tr(min) | IK | (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.58 | 935 | 2.98 | |
| Camphene | 3.79 | 961 | 0.44 |
| 4.17 | 982 | 1.73 | |
| 4.24 | 993 | 1.33 | |
| 4.54 | 1007 | 0.74 | |
| 4.65 | 1021 | 21.58 | |
| 4.86 | 1028 | 2.22 | |
| Limonene | 4.94 | 1033 | 4.94 |
| 1,8-cineole | 5.05 | 1038 | 34.58 |
| 5.47 | 1058 | 0.73 | |
| Linalool | 6.23 | 1099 | 0.57 |
| Camphor | 7.40 | 1088 | 5.17 |
| 1-terpinen-4-ol | 8.09 | 1142 | 0.63 |
| 8.40 | 1190 | 0.36 | |
| (E)-caryophyllene | 14.16 | 1422 | 2.97 |
| Germacrene B | 16.08 | 1534 | 3.39 |
| 16.68 | 1542 | 0.71 | |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 18.29 | 1585 | 2.56 |
| Total | 87.63 | ||
TR = Retention time.
IK = Kovat’s index.
Figure 1Effect of OEHM at doses of 100, 75 and 50 mg/kg on single application croton oil-induced mouse ear edema. The vertical bars represent the mean and SEM of 6 animals. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA followed by Student–Newman–Keuls test. p < 0.01 (b2), p < 0.001 (b3) compared to dexamethasone and p < 0.0001 (a4) compared to the negative control group (saline).
Figure 2Effect of OEHM on croton oil multiple application-induced ear edema. (A) shows the time–response curve of effect from days 0 to 9. The croton oil in acetone was applied on alternate days. The thickness of the ear was measured daily, using a digital caliper. On days 5–9, the ear of the animals received saline solution, dexamethasone or OEHM 100 mg/kg (arrows indicate the days when the treatment occurred). The effects of the compounds were examined by varying thickness of the ear, calculated as the difference between the initial and final thickness. The points represent the mean of 6 animals and vertical bars ± SEM (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test) a2 = p < 0.01 vs saline; a3 = p < 0.001 vs saline; a4 = p < 0.0001 vs saline; b4 = p < 0.0001 vs Dexamethasone. (B) shows the percentage of edema weight of each group on day 9 (one-way ANOVA followed by Student–Newman–Keuls test). a2 = p < 0.01 vs saline; b1 = p < 0,05 vs Dexamethasone.
Figure 3Effect of OEHM at doses of 100, 75 and 50 mg/kg on single application by carrageenan induced paw edema model. The vertical bars represent the mean and SEM. of 6 animals. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test. p < 0.01 (b2), p < 0.001 (b3) compared to dexamethasone and p < 0.0001 (a4) compared to the negative control group (saline).