| Literature DB >> 34950215 |
Luiz Renan Ramos da Silva1, Oberdan Oliveira Ferreira2,3, Jorddy Nevez Cruz2, Celeste de Jesus Pereira Franco2, Tainá Oliveira Dos Anjos1,2, Marcia Moraes Cascaes4, Wanessa Almeida da Costa5, Eloisa Helena de Aguiar Andrade1,2,3,4, Mozaniel Santana de Oliveira1,2.
Abstract
Medicinal and aromatic plants present important active compounds that have potential for use in food, pharmaceutical, and agriculture industries. In this sense, the present work aimed to conduct a literature review on the potential applications of essential oils from Lamiaceae species. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities were evaluated. The importance of this study is demonstrated as a way to theoretically provide information on the use of different plants belonging to the Lamiaceae family, especially with regard to the physical, chemical, and biological properties of its essential oils.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34950215 PMCID: PMC8692021 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6748052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Chemical composition and yield of essential oils from Lamiaceae species.
| Species | Plant part | Essential oil yield | Main compounds | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Leaves | 1.6% | Massoia lactone, linalool,( | [ |
|
| Leaves | ∗ | Pulegone, menthone, limonene | [ |
|
| Leaves | 0.80% | linalool, nerol, caryophyllene, menthone, geranyl acetate, terpineol, pulegone | [ |
|
| Leaves | ∗ | Fenchone, 3-carene, | [ |
|
| Leaves | 0.34% | 1,8-cineole, d-carene, camphor, limonene, germacrene B | [ |
|
| Leaves and stems | ∗ | 1,8-cineole, isolimonene, thuj-3-en-10-al, trans-pinocarveol | [ |
|
| Leaves and flowers | 0.10% | Citral, caryophyllene oxide, citronellal, geraniol, geranyl acetate, | [ |
|
| Leaves and flowers | ∗ | Citronellal and nerol | [ |
|
| Leaves and flowers | ∗ | Menthone, menthol, pulegone and menthyl acetate | [ |
|
| Leaves | 0.98% | Menthone, pulegone, cis-dihydrocarvone, carvacryl acetate, linalyl acetate, and linalool | [ |
|
| Leaves | 1.56 ± 0.15% | linalyl acetate and linalool | [ |
|
| Leaves | ∗ | 1,8-Cineole, eugenol, 4-terpineol | [ |
|
| Leaves and flowers | ∗ | Thymol, eugenol, 1,8-cineole, E-caryophyllene, | [ |
|
| Leaves | 1.5% | Carvacrol, thymol, p-cymene, | [ |
|
| Leaves | ∗ | 4-terpineol, sabinene hydrate, thymol | [ |
|
| Leaves | 0.009% | Thymol, | [ |
|
| Leaves | ∗ |
| [ |
Figure 1Monoterpenes: (1) = 1,8-cineole, (2) = camphor, (3) = pulegone, (4) = borneol, (5) = limonene, (6) = α-pinene, (7) = linalool, (8) = carvacrol, (9) = p-cymene, (10) = thujanol, (11) = ß-pinene, (12) = α-campholenal, (13) = citronellol, (14) = thymol, and (15) = ß-myrcene.
Figure 2Sesquiterpenes: (1) = Italicene epoxide, (2) = guaiol, (3) = 1,10-di-epi-cubenol, (4) = 8-cedren-13-ol, (5) = (Z)-α-trans-bergamotol, (6) = α-copaene, (7) = ß-costol, (8) = spathulenol, (9) = ß-bourbonene, (10) = δ-cadinene, (11) = ß-caryophyllene, and (12) = ß-farnesene.
Antioxidant activity of essential oils from Lamiaceae species.
| Species and plant part | Technique | Results | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 615.5 ± 76.5 | [ |
| ABTS | IC50 = 10.5 ± 0.6 | ||
| FRAP | IC50 = 3.8 ± 1.4 6 | ||
|
| DPPH | Radical scavenging = 92.6 ± 6.86% | [ |
| Reducing power | Reducing power = 0.9 ± 0.3 | ||
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 321.41 ± 2.53 | [ |
| FRAP | IC50 = 58.27 ± 2.72 | ||
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 2222.2 ± 25.2 | [ |
| ABTS | IC50 = 133.8 ± 4.8 | ||
| Reducing power | IC50 = 166.6 ± 1.9 | ||
| Phosphomolybdate | IC50 = 45.2 ± 1.2 | ||
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 3450 ± 172.5 | [ |
| ABTS | IC50 = 40.2 ± 0.2 | ||
| FRAP | IC50 = 215 ± 4.50 | ||
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 41, 23 | [ |
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 4.04 ± 0.09–0.21 ± 0.02 mg/mL | [ |
|
| Bleaching = 23.8 ± 0.6–85.3 ± 1.0% | ||
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 0.0459 ± 0.0042% (v/v) | [ |
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 369.9 ± 3.1– 1091.7 ± 4.5 | [ |
| Reducing power | IC50 = 230 ± 5.2– 315 ± 3.9 | ||
| ABTS | IC50 = 33.6 ± 0.3– 95.5 ± 2.2 | ||
|
| ABTS | IC50 = 14,00257 mg/mL | [ |
|
| DPPH | EC50 = 0.68 mL/mL | [ |
|
| DPPH | EC50 = 1.82 mL/mL | [ |
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 523.41 ± 8.25 | [ |
| FRAP | IC50 = 85.74 ± 7.57 | ||
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 10.08 ± 0.15 | [ |
| TBARS | IC50 = 1.76 ± 0.02 | ||
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 13.00 ± 0.51 | [ |
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 13.45 ± 0.35 | [ |
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 82.8 ± 3.1 | [ |
| ABTS | IC50 = 37.8 ± 0.9 | ||
| FRAP | IC50 = 720.19 ± 4.8 | ||
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 82.8 ± 3.1 | [ |
| ABTS | IC50 = 93.6 ± 0.8 µg/mL | ||
| FRAP | IC50 = 837.23 ± 3.2 | ||
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 57.6 ± 2.7 | [ |
| ABTS | IC50 = 66.6 ± 1.2 | ||
| FRAP | IC50 = 779.64 ± 8.6 | ||
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 31.5 ± 1.8 | [ |
|
| DPPH | IC50 = 0.619 ± 0.11 | [ |
| FRAP | IC50 = 2,13 ± 0.07 | ||
| TAC | IC50 = 0.78 ± 0.14 |
Antibacterial activity of Lamiaceae essential oils.
| Species | Bacteria | Method applied | Results | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Disc-diffusion | 11.8–21 mm | [ |
|
| 8–18 mm | |||
|
| 10–16 mm | |||
|
| 8–13 mm | |||
|
| 10.1–11.2 mm | |||
|
| 9–11.5 mm | |||
|
|
| Agar-disc-diffusion | 16.0 ± 1.2 mm | [ |
|
| 3.0 ± 0.6 mm | |||
|
| 20.0 ± 1.6 mm | |||
|
| 14.0 ± 1.0 mm | |||
|
|
| Microdilution | 29.00 ± 0.35 mm | [ |
|
| 49.00 ± 1.00 mm | |||
|
| 43.00 ± 0,35 mm | |||
|
|
| Microdilution |
| [ |
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Microdilution | 14.25 | [ |
|
| 14.25 | |||
|
| 11.40 | |||
|
| 14.25 | |||
|
| 17.10 | |||
|
| 17.10 | |||
|
| 9.50 | |||
|
| 9.50 | |||
|
| 9.50 | |||
|
| 11.40 | |||
|
| 9.50 | |||
|
|
| Microdilution | 0.16 mg/mL | [ |
|
|
| Microdilution | 2 mg/mL | |
|
| . | Turbidity measurements | 0.5 mg/mL | [ |
| CFU | 27.500 bacterial/mL | |||
| T. serpyllum | S. mutans | Turbidity measurements | 0.9 mg/mL | |
| CFU | 1.750.000 bacterial/mL | |||
| T. vulgaris | S. mutans | Turbidity measurements | 0.75 mg/mL | |
| CFU | 3500 bacterial/mL | |||
| T. zygis | S. mutans | Turbidity measurements | 0.5 mg/mL | |
| CFU | 4500 bacterial/mL |
Figure 3Potential mechanism of action of essential oils on bacteria, adapted from [145,146].
Antifungal activity of Lamiaceae essential oils.
| Species | Fungi | Method applied | Results | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Broth microdilution | MIC >9 mg/mL | [ |
|
| 2.2 < MIC ≤4.5 mg/mL | |||
|
| 2.2 < MIC ≤4.5 mg/mL | |||
|
| MIC >9 mg/mL | |||
|
| MIC >9 mg/mL | |||
|
|
| Potato dextrose agar (PDA) | 500 ppm: 30% | [ |
|
|
| Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) | MIC: 1.25 | [ |
|
| MIC: 2.5–1.25 | |||
|
| MIC: 1.25 | |||
|
| MIC: 1.25 | |||
|
| MIC: 1.25 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.16–0.32 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64–0.32 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 1.25 | |||
|
| MIC: 1.25 | |||
|
|
| Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) | MIC: 0.64 | |
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.16 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.32 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.32 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.32 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.32 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.32 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.32 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.32 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
| MIC: 0.64 | |||
|
|
| Potato dextrose agar (PDA) | 0 | [ |
|
| 0 | |||
|
|
| 0 | ||
|
| 0 | |||
|
|
| CYGA (chloramphenicol-yeast-glucose-agar) | 0.25 mg/L–18% | [ |
|
| 0.25 mg/L–37% | |||
|
|
| Potato dextrose agar (PDA) | 0 | [ |
|
| 0 | |||
|
|
| CYGA (chloramphenicol-yeast-glucose-agar) | 0.25 mg/L–10% | [ |
|
| ∗∗∗∗ | |||
|
|
| CYGA (chloramphenicol-yeast-glucose-agar) | 0.25 mg/L–30% | [ |
|
| 0.25 mg/L–99% |
Figure 4Potential mechanism of action of essential oils in fungi, adapted from [152].