Literature DB >> 28148661

Cement-in-cement femoral component revision in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty: results with a minimum follow-up of five years.

N A Sandiford1, S S Jameson2, M J Wilson3, M J W Hubble3, A J Timperley3, J R Howell3.   

Abstract

AIMS: We present the clinical and radiological results at a minimum follow-up of five years for patients who have undergone multiple cement-in-cement revisions of their femoral component at revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the outcome on a consecutive series of 24 patients (10 men, 14 women) (51 procedures) who underwent more than one cement-in-cement revision of the same femoral component. The mean age of the patients was 67.5 years (36 to 92) at final follow-up. Function was assessed using the original Harris hip score (HHS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the Merle D'Aubigné Postel score (MDP).
RESULTS: The mean length of follow-up was 81.7 months (64 to 240). A total of 41 isolated acetabular revisions were performed in which stem removal facilitated access to the acetabulum, six revisions were conducted for loosening of both components and two were isolated stem revisions (each of these patients had undergone at least two revisions). There was significant improvement in the OHS (p = 0.041), HHS (p = 0.019) and MDP (p = 0.042) scores at final follow-up There were no stem revisions for aseptic loosening. Survival of the femoral component was 91.9% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 71.5 to 97.9) at five years and 91.7% (95% CI 70 to 97) at ten years (number at risk 13), with stem revision for all causes as the endpoint.
CONCLUSION: Cement-in-cement revision is a viable technique for performing multiple revisions of the well cemented femoral component during revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of five years follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:199-203. ©2017 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Cement; Cement-in-cement; Hip; Revision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28148661     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B2.BJJ-2016-0076.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  7 in total

1.  Cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter Short Revision Stem: A review of 50 consecutive hips.

Authors:  Andrew J Berg; Antonia Hoyle; Edward Yates; Aslam Chougle; Rama Mohan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-09

2.  Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years.

Authors:  Antonio Klasan; James Millar; Jonathan Quayle; Bill Farrington; Peter Nicholas Misur
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Cement-in-cement technique of the femoral component in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision: A systematic review of the contemporary literature.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Fabio Mancino; Amil Agarwal; Leonidas Roumeliotis; Alex Gu; Ioannis Gkiatas; Danilo Togninalli; Vasileios S Nikolaou; Michael M Alexiades
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-30

4.  Technical Note: Pedicle Cement Augmentation with Proximal Screw Toggle and Loosening.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William R Walsh; Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond?

Authors:  A Liddle; M Webb; N Clement; S Green; J Liddle; M German; J Holland
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study.

Authors:  Marcin Ceynowa; Krzysztof Zerdzicki; Pawel Klosowski; Maciej Zrodowski; Rafal Pankowski; Marek Roclawski; Tomasz Mazurek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Conversion from a failed proximal femoral nail anti-rotation to a cemented or uncemented total hip arthroplasty device: a retrospective review of 198 hips with previous intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Authors:  Weiguang Yu; Xiulan Han; Wenli Chen; Shuai Mao; Mingdong Zhao; Xinchao Zhang; Guowei Han; Junxing Ye; Meiji Chen; Jintao Zhuang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.