| Literature DB >> 28148263 |
Ishaku L Elisha1,2, Alexander R Jambalang1,3, Francien S Botha1, Elna M Buys4, Lyndy J McGaw1, Jacobus N Eloff5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rise in antimicrobial resistance in a plethora of nosocomial and opportunistic bacterial pathogens often isolated from commercial eggs, poses a serious public health concern. The existence of these contaminants may also serve as a drawback in the current efforts of improving the well-being of immunocompromised patients. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of plant extracts that had good activity on Escherichia coli in previous word on pathogens isolated from eggs for possible use in combating pathogens from eggs.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial; Hens’ egg isolates; Nosocomial; Opportunistic pathogens; Plant extracts
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28148263 PMCID: PMC5289020 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1597-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and total antibacterial activity (TAA) and selectivity index (SI) of the nine selected acetone leaf extracts against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Klebsiella sp. and Salmonella serotype Typhimurium (AJ 33)
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plants | MIC (mg/ml) | TAA (ml/g) | SI | MIC (mg/ml) | TAA (ml/g) | SI | MIC (mg/ml) | TAA (ml/g) | SI |
|
| 0.16 | 749.8 | 0.41 | 0.16 | 749.8 | 0.41 | 0.31 | 387.0 | 0.21 |
|
|
| 252.1 | 0.72 |
| 252.1 | 0.72 |
| 252.1 | 0.72 |
|
|
| 325.4 | 1.01 | 0.16 | 162.7 | 0.51 | 0.16 | 162.7 | 0.51 |
|
|
| 339.6 | 0.68 | 0.16 | 169.8 | 0.34 | 0.16 | 169.8 | 0.34 |
|
| 0.31 | 74.3 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 144.0 | 0.33 | 0.63 | 36.6 | 0.08 |
|
| 0.16 | 179.0 | 0.09 |
| 357.9 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 179.0 | 0.09 |
|
|
| 1390.4 | 0.03 | 0.63 | 176.6 | 0* | 0.16 | 695.2 | 0.01 |
|
|
| 1124.6 | 0.07 | 0.31 | 290.2 | 0.02 | 0.31 | 290.2 | 0.02 |
|
| 0.16 | 115.4 | 0.25 |
| 230.8 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 59.6 | 0.13 |
| Mean | 0.13 | NA | NA | 0.2 | NA | NA | 0.25 | NA | NA |
| SD | 0.07 | NA | NA | 0.17 | NA | NA | 0.16 | NA | NA |
| Gentamicin | 0.0008 | NA | NA | 0.0008 | NA | NA | 0.006 | NA | NA |
NA Not applicable, AJ Alexander Jambalang, * 0.004
The SI and TAA values of the extracts was calculated from the cytotoxicity and percentage yield of the extracts results published in Elisha et al. [12]
Numbers in bold font MIC < 0.1 mg/ml
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and total antibacterial activity (TAA) and selectivity index (SI) of the nine selected acetone leaf extracts against Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter cloacae and Escherichia coli
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plants | MIC (mg/ml) | TAA (ml/g) | SI | MIC (mg/ml) | TAA (ml/g) | SI | MIC (mg/ml) | TAA (ml/g) | SI |
|
| 0.63 | 190.4 | 0.11 | 0.31 | 387.0 | 0.21 |
| 1499.6 | 0.83 |
|
| 0.63 | 32.0 | 0.09 |
| 252.1 | 0.72 |
| 252.1 | 0.72 |
|
| 0.31 | 84.0 | 0.26 | 0.16 | 162.7 | 0.51 |
| 325.4 | 1.01 |
|
| 0.31 | 87.6 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 169.8 | 0.34 |
| 339.6 | 0.68 |
|
| 0.63 | 36.6 | 0.08 |
| 287.9 | 0.66 |
| 287.9 | 0.66 |
|
| 0.31 | 92.7 | 0.04 |
| 357.9 | 0.17 |
| 715.8 | 0.34 |
|
|
| 5561.7 | 0.12 |
| 1390.4 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 695.2 | 0.01 |
|
|
| 1124.6 | 0.07 |
| 1124.6 | 0.07 |
| 1124.6 | 0.07 |
|
| 1.25 | 14.8 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 115.4 | 0.25 |
| 230.8 | 0.51 |
| Mean | 0.46 | NA | NA | 0.13 | NA | NA | 0.08 | NA | NA |
| SD | 0.35 | NA | NA | 0.07 | NA | NA | 0.03 | NA | NA |
| Gentamicin | 0.0008 | NA | NA | 0.0002 | NA | NA | 0.006 | NA | NA |
NA Not applicable.
The SI and TAA values of the extracts was calculated from the cytotoxicity and percentage yield of the extracts results published in Elisha et al. [12]
Numbers in bold font MIC < 0.1 mg/ml
Fig. 1Sensitivity of the six pathogenic egg isolates to the nine selected acetone leaf extracts. Legend: a, b, c, d and e = statistically significant difference in the mean MIC of the pathogens, p < 0.05
Fig. 2Mean minimal inhibitory concentration of the nine selected acetone leaf extracts tested against six opportunistic bacterial pathogens isolated from commercial eggs. Legend: HR = Hypericum roeperianum, CT = Cremaspora triflora, HA = Heteromorpha arborescens, PV = Pittosporum viridiflorum, BS = Bolusanthus speciosus, CA = Calpurnia aurea, ML = Maesa lanceolata, EC = Elaeodendron croceum, MM = Morus mesozygia. The mean difference of the nine acetone leaf extracts were not statistically significant, p > 0.05