| Literature DB >> 32703212 |
Aitebiremen G Omokhua-Uyi1,2, Muna A Abdalla1,3, Carmen M Leonard4, Abimbola Aro1, Osariyekemwen O Uyi5, Johannes Van Staden2, Lyndy J McGaw1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by opportunistic pathogens are among the leading health challenges globally. Most available treatment options are failing as a result of antibiotic resistance and adverse effects. Natural sources such as plants may serve as promising alternatives.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-adhesion; Anti-biofilm; Antimicrobial; Chromolaena odorata; Compounds; Metabolic activity; South Africa; Toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32703212 PMCID: PMC7376718 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-020-03024-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther ISSN: 2662-7671
Fig. 1Structures of isolated compounds from South African biotype Chromolaena odorata
Minimum inhibitory concentration of fractions against selected microbial strains in mg/mL
| Organism | Time (h) | Hexane | Chloroform | Butanol | ETAC | Water | Gent | Cipro | Amp B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | 1.25 | 0.63 | NA | ||||||
| 0.63 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.500 | 0.050 | NA | ||||
| – | 0.63 | 0.63 | > 2.5 | 0.63 | 0.500 | ND | NA | ||
| – | 0.63 | 0.31 | 0.63 | 1.25 | 0.63 | ND | NA | ||
| 0.63 | 1.25 | 0.063 | NA | ||||||
| 24 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 1.25 | 0.63 | |||||
| 48 | 0.31 | 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | NA | NA | 0.063 | |
| 48 | 0.31 | 2.5 | 1.25 | > 2.5 | 1.25 | NA | NA | ||
| 72 | 0.31 | 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | NA | NA | 0.063 | |
| 120 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | NA | NA | 0.125 | |
| 48 | 0.63 | 2.5 | 1.25 | 2.5 | 2.5 | NA | NA | ||
| 72 | 0.63 | 2.5 | 1.25 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | NA | NA | 0.125 | |
| 120 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | NA | NA | 0.125 |
ND not detected, NA not available, ETAC ethyl acetate, Gent gentamicin, Cipro ciprofloxacin, Amp B amphotericin B
Value with asterisk are regarded as those fraction(s) with good activity
Minimum inhibitory concentrations of combined fractions obtained from silica gel column against most susceptible strains in mg/mL
| Organism | Time (h) | Sub-Fraction | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | ||
| – | > 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.31 | ||||
| – | 1.25 | 0.3 | 0.63 | 0.313 | |||
| – | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.63 | |||
| – | 1.25 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.63 | |
| 48 | 2.5 | > 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | |
| 72 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | ||
| 48 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 1.25 | 0.31 | |||
| 72 | > 2.5 | 0.63 | 0.63 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | |
| 120 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | |
| 48 | > 2.5 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | ||
| 72 | > 2.5 | 0.63 | 1.25 | 2.5 | 2.5 | > 2.5 | |
F1 fraction 1, F2 fraction 2, F3 fraction 3, F4 fraction 4, F5 fraction 5, F6 fraction 6. Values with bold indicate promising antimicrobial activity while value in asterisk indicate best activity
Antimicrobial activity of isolated flavonoid compounds in mg/mL
| Organism | Time (h) | Compounds | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Gent | Cipro | Amp B | ||
| – | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.008 | 0.063 | NA | |||
| E. coli (1) | – | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.016 | 0.002 | NA | ||
| – | > 0.25 | 0.25 | > 0.25 | 0.031 | 5 × 10−5 | NA | ||
| – | > 0.25 | 0.25 | > 0.25 | 0.008 | 1 × 10−3 | NA | ||
| – | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.125 | > 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.05 | NA | |
| Mean | – | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.14 | ND | 0.06 | 0.02 | NA |
| SD | – | 0 | 0.04 | 0.11 | ND | 0.11 | 0.03 | NA |
| 48 | > 0.25 | > 0.25 | > 0.25 | NA | NA | 0.08 | ||
| 72 | > 0.25 | 0.125 | > 0.25 | > 0.25 | NA | NA | 0.125 | |
| 48 | 0.063 | 0.25 | NA | NA | 0.031 | |||
| 72 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.25 | > 0.25 | NA | NA | 0.063 | |
| 120 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | > 2.5 | NA | NA | |
| Mean | ND | 0.07 | ND | ND | ND | NA | 0.07 | |
| SD | ND | 0.06 | ND | ND | ND | NA | 0.04 | |
E. coli (1): E. coli (ATTC25922) reference strain; E. coli (2): E. coli (B1989/17) isolate; E. coli (3); E. coli (B1962/17) isolate; Gent = gentamicin; Cipro = ciprofloxacin; Amp B = amphotericin B; 1 = compound 1; 2 = compound 2; 3 = compound 3; 4 = compound 4; NA: not applicable; ND: not detected; SD: standard deviation. Number in bold indicates good antimicrobial activity
Fig. 2(a-b) Biofilm inhibition of E. coli and S. aureus at 0 and 24 h of isolated compounds 1, 2 and 3. 1: compound 1 at 1 mg/mL; 2A: compound 2 at 1 mg/mL; 2B: compound 2 at 0.063 mg/mL MIC against E. coli and S. aureus; 3A: compound 3 at 1 mg/mL; 3B: compound 3 at 0.125 mg/mL against E. coli and 0.032 mg/mL against S. aureus
Fig. 3(a-b) Metabolic activity inhibition of E. coli and S. aureus at 0 and 24 h by compound 2 and 3 compared with ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. 2A: compound 2 at 1 mg/mL; 2B: compound 2 at 0.063 mg/mL MIC against E. coli and S. aureus; 3A: compound 3 at 1 mg/mL; 3B: compound 3 at 0.125 mg/mL against E. coli and 0.032 mg/mL against S. aureus
Fig. 4(a-b). Adherence inhibition of E. coli and S. aureus by isolated compounds 2 and 3 at 1 mg/mL concentration compared to positive controls
Lethal concentration of compounds, and controls tested against Vero monkey kidney, Caco2 and C3A cell lines in mg/mL
| Sample | Vero cells | Caco2 cells | C3A cells |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | NA | NA |
| 2 | 0.200 | > 0.200 | > 200 |
| 3 | 0.197 | 0.159 | > 200 |
| 4 | > 0.200 | 0.193 | NA |
| Ciprofloxacin | > 0.200 | > 0.200 | NA |
| Gentamicin | > 0.200 | > 0.200 | NA |
| Doxorubicin | 0.0028 ± 0.012 | 0.0004 | 0.0033 |
1 = compound 1; 2 = compound 2; 3 = compound 3; 4 = compound 4; NA not available. > 0.200 indicates that no sign of toxicity was noticed at the highest concentration tested
Selectivity index of microbial strains tested against Vero and Caco2 cell lines
| Microbial strain | Cell line | Time (h) | Compound 2 | Compound 3 | Compound 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selectivity index (LC50/MIC) | |||||
| Vero | – | 6.516 | 12.313 | ND | |
| Caco2 | – | ND | 9.938 | 0.772 | |
| Vero | – | 6.515 | 3.127 | ND | |
| Caco2 | – | ND | 2.52 | 1.544 | |
| Vero | – | 6.452 | 0.788 | ND | |
| Caco2 | – | ND | 0.636 | ND | |
| Vero | – | 6.452 | 0.788 | ND | |
| Caco2 | – | ND | 0.636 | ND | |
| Vero | – | 1.616 | 1.576 | ND | |
| Caco2 | – | ND | 1.272 | NA | |
| Vero | 48 | 12.625 | NA | ND | |
| 72 | 1.616 | NA | ND | ||
| Caco2 | 48 | ND | NA | NA | |
| 72 | ND | NA | NA | ||
| Vero | 48 | 6.355 | ND | ||
| 72 | 1.616 | 0.788 | ND | ||
| Caco2 | 48 | ND | 5.129 | 0.7772 | |
| 72 | ND | 0.636 | NA | ||
ND not detected due to LC50 greater than the highest concentration of 0.2 mg/mL tested showing no toxicity, NA not available as a result of the sample not being able to inhibit the tested fungal strain at highest concentration