Literature DB >> 28147417

Neurologic Prognostication: Neurologic Examination and Current Guidelines.

Claudio Sandroni1, Sonia D'Arrigo1.   

Abstract

Clinical examination is paramount for prognostication in patients who are comatose after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. At 72 hours from recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), an absent or extensor motor response to pain (M ≤ 2) is a very sensitive, but not specific predictor of poor neurologic outcome. Bilaterally absent pupillary or corneal reflexes are less sensitive, but highly specific predictors. Besides the clinical examination, investigations such as somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), electroencephalography (EEG), blood levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), or imaging studies can be used for neuroprognostication. In patients who have not been treated using targeted temperature management (TTM), the 2006 Practice Parameter of the American Academy of Neurology suggested a unimodal approach for prognostication within 72 hours from ROSC, based on status myoclonus (SM) within 24 hours, SSEP, or NSE at 24 to 72 hours and ocular reflexes or M ≤ 2 at 72 hours. The 2015 guidelines from the European Resuscitation Council and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine suggest a multimodal prognostication algorithm, to be used in both TTM-treated and non-TTM-treated patients with M ≤ 2 at ≥ 72 hours from ROSC. Ocular reflexes (pupillary and corneal) and SSEPs should be used first, followed by a combination of other predictors (SM, EEG, NSE, imaging) if results of the first predictors are normal. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28147417     DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Neurol        ISSN: 0271-8235            Impact factor:   3.420


  6 in total

Review 1.  Resuscitating the Globally Ischemic Brain: TTM and Beyond.

Authors:  Melika Hosseini; Robert H Wilson; Christian Crouzet; Arya Amirhekmat; Kevin S Wei; Yama Akbari
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Unsupervised learning of early post-arrest brain injury phenotypes.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Patrick J Coppler; Teresa L May; Karen Hirsch; John Faro; Pawan Solanki; McKenzie Brown; Jacob S Puyana; Jon C Rittenberger; Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Neuromarkers and neurological outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia-experience from the HAnnover COoling REgistry (HACORE).

Authors:  Muharrem Akin; Vera Garcheva; Jan-Thorben Sieweke; John Adel; Ulrike Flierl; Johann Bauersachs; Andreas Schäfer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Poor neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest; a spectrum with individual implications.

Authors:  Rachel Beekman; David M Greer; Carolina B Maciel
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav Case Rep       Date:  2017-09-07

Review 5.  Targeted Temperature Management and Multimodality Monitoring of Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Peggy L Nguyen; Laith Alreshaid; Roy A Poblete; Geoffrey Konye; Jonathan Marehbian; Gene Sung
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Prediction of poor outcome after hypoxic-ischemic brain injury by diffusion-weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruili Wei; Chaonan Wang; Fangping He; Lirong Hong; Jie Zhang; Wangxiao Bao; Fangxia Meng; Benyan Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.