BACKGROUND: Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S-100b have been used to assess neurological damage following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Cut-offs were derived from small normothermic cohorts. Whether similar cut-offs apply to patients treated with hypothermia remained undetermined. METHODS: We investigated 251 patients with OHCA treated with hypothermia but without routine prognostication. Neuromarkers were determined at day 3, neurological outcome was assessed after hospital discharge by cerebral performance category (CPC). RESULTS: Good neurological outcome (CPC≤2) was achieved in 41%. Elevated neuromarkers, older age and absence of ST-segment elevation after ROSC were associated with increased mortality. Poor neurological outcome in survivors was additionally associated with history of cerebrovascular events, sepsis and higher admission lactate. Mean NSE was 33μg/l [16-94] vs. 119μg/l [25-406]; p<0.001, for survivors vs. non-survivors, and 21μg/l [16-29] vs. 40μg/l [23-98], p<0.001 for good vs. poor neurological outcome. S-100b was 0.127μg/l [0.063-0.360] vs. 0.772μg/l [0.121-2.710], p<0.001 and 0.086μg/l [0.061-0.122] vs. 0.138μg/l [0.090-0.271], p = 0.009, respectively. For mortality, thresholds of 36μg/l for NSE and 0.128μg/l for S-100b could be determined; for poor neurological outcome 33μg/l (NSE) and 0.123μg/l (S-100b), respectively. Positive predictive value for NSE was 81% (74-88) and 79% (71-85) for S-100b. CONCLUSIONS: Thresholds for NSE and S-100b predicting mortality and poor neurological outcome are similar in OHCA patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia as in those reported before the era of hypothermia. However, both biomarkers do not have enough specificity to predict mortality or poor neurological outcome on their own and should only be additively used in clinical decision making.
BACKGROUND:Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S-100b have been used to assess neurological damage following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Cut-offs were derived from small normothermic cohorts. Whether similar cut-offs apply to patients treated with hypothermia remained undetermined. METHODS: We investigated 251 patients with OHCA treated with hypothermia but without routine prognostication. Neuromarkers were determined at day 3, neurological outcome was assessed after hospital discharge by cerebral performance category (CPC). RESULTS: Good neurological outcome (CPC≤2) was achieved in 41%. Elevated neuromarkers, older age and absence of ST-segment elevation after ROSC were associated with increased mortality. Poor neurological outcome in survivors was additionally associated with history of cerebrovascular events, sepsis and higher admission lactate. Mean NSE was 33μg/l [16-94] vs. 119μg/l [25-406]; p<0.001, for survivors vs. non-survivors, and 21μg/l [16-29] vs. 40μg/l [23-98], p<0.001 for good vs. poor neurological outcome. S-100b was 0.127μg/l [0.063-0.360] vs. 0.772μg/l [0.121-2.710], p<0.001 and 0.086μg/l [0.061-0.122] vs. 0.138μg/l [0.090-0.271], p = 0.009, respectively. For mortality, thresholds of 36μg/l for NSE and 0.128μg/l for S-100b could be determined; for poor neurological outcome 33μg/l (NSE) and 0.123μg/l (S-100b), respectively. Positive predictive value for NSE was 81% (74-88) and 79% (71-85) for S-100b. CONCLUSIONS: Thresholds for NSE and S-100b predicting mortality and poor neurological outcome are similar in OHCA patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia as in those reported before the era of hypothermia. However, both biomarkers do not have enough specificity to predict mortality or poor neurological outcome on their own and should only be additively used in clinical decision making.
Authors: Niklas Nielsen; Jørn Wetterslev; Tobias Cronberg; David Erlinge; Yvan Gasche; Christian Hassager; Janneke Horn; Jan Hovdenes; Jesper Kjaergaard; Michael Kuiper; Tommaso Pellis; Pascal Stammet; Michael Wanscher; Matt P Wise; Anders Åneman; Nawaf Al-Subaie; Søren Boesgaard; John Bro-Jeppesen; Iole Brunetti; Jan Frederik Bugge; Christopher D Hingston; Nicole P Juffermans; Matty Koopmans; Lars Køber; Jørund Langørgen; Gisela Lilja; Jacob Eifer Møller; Malin Rundgren; Christian Rylander; Ondrej Smid; Christophe Werer; Per Winkel; Hans Friberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: K H Scholz; D Andresen; B W Böttiger; H J Busch; M Fischer; N Frey; M Kelm; C Kill; B Schieffer; C Storm; H Thiele; J T Gräsner Journal: Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 0.840
Authors: Muharrem Akin; Jan-Thorben Sieweke; Florian Zauner; Vera Garcheva; Jörn Tongers; L Christian Napp; Lars Friedrich; Jens Treptau; Max-Udo Bahntje; Ulrike Flierl; Daniel G Sedding; Johann Bauersachs; Andreas Schäfer Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Christophe Henri Valdemar Duez; Anders Morten Grejs; Anni Nørgaard Jeppesen; Anne Dilani Schrøder; Eldar Søreide; Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen; Hans Kirkegaard Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Romergryko G Geocadin; Clifton W Callaway; Ericka L Fink; Eyal Golan; David M Greer; Nerissa U Ko; Eddy Lang; Daniel J Licht; Bradley S Marino; Norma D McNair; Mary Ann Peberdy; Sarah M Perman; Daniel B Sims; Jasmeet Soar; Claudio Sandroni Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-07-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mony Shuvy; Laurie J Morrison; Maria Koh; Feng Qiu; Jason E Buick; Paul Dorian; Damon C Scales; Jack V Tu; P Richard Verbeek; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Dennis T Ko Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Stephen A Bernard; Timothy W Gray; Michael D Buist; Bruce M Jones; William Silvester; Geoff Gutteridge; Karen Smith Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andreas Schäfer; Nikos Werner; Daniel Burkhoff; Jan-Thorben Sieweke; Andreas Zietzer; Maryna Masyuk; Nanna Louise Junker Udesen; Ralf Westenfeld; Jacob Eifer Møller Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2020-05-14
Authors: Marco Roffi; Carlo Patrono; Jean-Philippe Collet; Christian Mueller; Marco Valgimigli; Felicita Andreotti; Jeroen J Bax; Michael A Borger; Carlos Brotons; Derek P Chew; Baris Gencer; Gerd Hasenfuss; Keld Kjeldsen; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ulf Landmesser; Julinda Mehilli; Debabrata Mukherjee; Robert F Storey; Stephan Windecker Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Muharrem Akin; Jan-Thorben Sieweke; Vera Garcheva; Carolina Sanchez Martinez; John Adel; Pia Plank; Paris Zandian; Kurt-Wolfram Sühs; Johann Bauersachs; Andreas Schäfer Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-05-31
Authors: Vera Garcheva; Muharrem Akin; John Adel; Carolina Sanchez Martinez; Johann Bauersachs; Andreas Schäfer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael J Stacey; Neil E Hill; Iain T Parsons; Jenny Wallace; Natalie Taylor; Rachael Grimaldi; Nishma Shah; Anna Marshall; Carol House; John P O'Hara; Stephen J Brett; David R Woods Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John Adel; Muharrem Akin; Vera Garcheva; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Johann Bauersachs; L Christian Napp; Andreas Schäfer Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-02-03