Literature DB >> 32531403

Unsupervised learning of early post-arrest brain injury phenotypes.

Jonathan Elmer1, Patrick J Coppler2, Teresa L May3, Karen Hirsch4, John Faro5, Pawan Solanki6, McKenzie Brown2, Jacob S Puyana2, Jon C Rittenberger7, Clifton W Callaway2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Trials may be neutral when they do not appropriately target the experimental intervention. We speculated multimodality assessment of early hypoxic-ischemic brain injury would identify phenotypes likely to benefit from therapeutic interventions.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including comatose patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by one of 126 emergency medical services or in-hospital arrest at one of 26 hospitals from 2011 to 2019. All patients were ultimately transported to a single tertiary center for care including standardized initial neurological examination, brain imaging and electroencephalography; targeted temperature management (TTM); hemodynamic optimization targeting mean arterial pressure (MAP) >80 mmHg; and, coronary angiography for clinical suspicion for acute coronary syndrome. We used unsupervised learning to identify brain injury phenotypes defined by admission neurodiagnostics. We tested for interactions between phenotype and TTM, hemodynamic management and cardiac catheterization in models predicting recovery.
RESULTS: We included 1086 patients with mean (SD) age 58 (17) years of whom 955 (88%) were resuscitated from OHCA. Survival to hospital discharge was 27%, and 248 (23%) were discharged with Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-3. We identified 5 clusters defining distinct brain injury phenotypes, each comprising 14% to 30% of the cohort with discharge CPC 1-3 in 59% to <1%. We found significant interactions between cluster and TTM strategy (P = 0.01), MAP (P < 0.001) and coronary angiography (P = 0.04) in models predicting outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified patterns of early hypoxic-ischemic injury based on multiple diagnostic modalities that predict responsiveness to several therapeutic interventions recently tested in neutral clinical trials.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac arrest; Clustering; Outcomes; Phenotype; Precision medicine; Unsupervised learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32531403      PMCID: PMC7390683          DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.05.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  37 in total

1.  Implications of Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect for Reporting and Analysis of Randomized Trials in Critical Care.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; James F Burke; Jeremy B Sussman; Hallie C Prescott; Rodney A Hayward; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Part 8: Post-Cardiac Arrest Care: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Clifton W Callaway; Michael W Donnino; Ericka L Fink; Romergryko G Geocadin; Eyal Golan; Karl B Kern; Marion Leary; William J Meurer; Mary Ann Peberdy; Trevonne M Thompson; Janice L Zimmerman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Time to awakening after cardiac arrest and the association with target temperature management.

Authors:  Anna Lybeck; Tobias Cronberg; Anders Aneman; Christian Hassager; Janneke Horn; Jan Hovdenes; Jesper Kjærgaard; Michael Kuiper; Michael Wanscher; Pascal Stammet; Matthew P Wise; Niklas Nielsen; Susann Ullén; Hans Friberg
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 4.  Effect of Hypothermia and Targeted Temperature Management on Drug Disposition and Response Following Cardiac Arrest: A Comprehensive Review of Preclinical and Clinical Investigations.

Authors:  Kacey B Anderson; Samuel M Poloyac; Patrick M Kochanek; Philip E Empey
Journal:  Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.286

5.  Long-term survival benefit from treatment at a specialty center after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Jon C Rittenberger; Patrick J Coppler; Francis X Guyette; Ankur A Doshi; Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Risk and treatment effect heterogeneity: re-analysis of individual participant data from 32 large clinical trials.

Authors:  David M Kent; Jason Nelson; Issa J Dahabreh; Peter M Rothwell; Douglas G Altman; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Association of early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived neurological prognosis with mortality after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Cesar Torres; Tom P Aufderheide; Michael A Austin; Clifton W Callaway; Eyal Golan; Heather Herren; Jamie Jasti; Peter J Kudenchuk; Damon C Scales; Dion Stub; Derek K Richardson; Dana M Zive
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 8.  Prognostication after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Claudio Sandroni; Sonia D'Arrigo; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Targeting low-normal or high-normal mean arterial pressure after cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a randomised pilot trial.

Authors:  Pekka Jakkula; Ville Pettilä; Markus B Skrifvars; Johanna Hästbacka; Pekka Loisa; Marjaana Tiainen; Erika Wilkman; Jussi Toppila; Talvikki Koskue; Stepani Bendel; Thomas Birkelund; Raili Laru-Sompa; Miia Valkonen; Matti Reinikainen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Individualized perfusion targets in hypoxic ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Mypinder S Sekhon; Donald E Griesdale
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  4 in total

1.  Bayesian Outcome Prediction After Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Patrick J Coppler; Bobby L Jones; Daniel S Nagin; Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 11.800

2.  Deep learning of early brain imaging to predict post-arrest electroencephalography.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Chang Liu; Matthew Pease; Dooman Arefan; Patrick J Coppler; Katharyn L Flickinger; Joseph M Mettenburg; Maria E Baldwin; Niravkumar Barot; Shandong Wu
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 3.  Novel approaches to prediction in severe brain injury.

Authors:  Brian C Fidali; Robert D Stevens; Jan Claassen
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 6.283

4.  Awakening from post anoxic coma with burst suppression with identical bursts.

Authors:  Patrick J Coppler; Amanda E Kusztos; Mark Andreae; Brad W Butcher; Ankur Doshi; Maria E Baldwin; Niravkumar Barot; James F Castellano; Joanna S Fong-Isariyawongse; Alexandra Urban; Clifton W Callaway; Alexis Steinberg; Jonathan Elmer
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-07-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.