| Literature DB >> 28147324 |
Jung Woo Eun1, Hee Doo Yang1, Soo Hyun Kim2, Sungyoup Hong3, Kyu Nam Park2, Suk Woo Nam1, Sikyoung Jeong3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early prognostication of neurological outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest (CA) is important for devising patient treatment strategies. However, there is still a lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers for easy identification of these patients. We evaluated whether molecular signatures from blood of CA patients might help to improve the prediction of neurological outcome.Entities:
Keywords: Pathology Section; cardiac arrest; cerebral performance category; molecular signature; neurological prognosis; peripheral blood transcriptome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28147324 PMCID: PMC5369953 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14877
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1A schematic view of the procedure which contained patient cohorts and technologies used to find novel biomarkers in peripheral blood of CA patients
The CPC cohorts at 48 hr after CA were separated to CPC 1-2, 3-4, and 5 and the blood transcriptome scans of CA patients were performed about selected patient sample. After the blood transcriptome scan, the data were analyzed to two different groups: Expression profiles of the CPC cohort and differentially expressed gene signatures in Poor cohort.
Patient characteristics
| Good outcome | Poor outcome | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (n=10) | (n=12) | ||
| Male, n (%) | 8 (80) | 11 (91.7) | 0.42 |
| Age, y, median (Q1-Q3) | 57.00 (56.13-56.25) | 55.50 (56.03∼56.25) | 0.86 |
| Witnessed, n (%) | 10 (100) | 10 (83.3) | 0.00 |
| Initial rhythm, n (%) | 0.89 | ||
| VF/VT | 9 (90) | 7 (58.3) | |
| PEA | 1 (10) | 2 (16.7) | |
| Asystole | 0 | 3 (25.0) | |
| Primary cardiac cause, n (%) | 10 (100) | 9 (75.0) | 0.22 |
| MI | 4 (40) | 4 (33.3) | 1.00 |
| Time from arrest to ROSC, min, | 20.00 (14.50∼40.75) | 36.00 (33.20∼33.25) | 0.03 |
| median (Q1-Q3) | |||
| Medical history, n(%) | |||
| coronary disease | 2 (20) | 4 (33.3) | 0.78 |
| arrhythmia | 1 (10) | 1 (8.3) | 0.89 |
| hypertension | 4 (40) | 5 (41.7) | 0.50 |
| diabetes | 0 (0) | 3 (25.0) | 0.22 |
| lung disease | 0 (0) | 1 (8.3) | 0.99 |
| renal disease | 0 (0) | 1 (8.3) | 0.99 |
| APACHE II, mean (IQR) | 15.50 (15.75-17.00) | 33.00 (32.75-33.60) | <0.01 |
| GCS 48 hr, mean (IQR) | 3.00 (4.50-5.75) | 3.00 (4.50-7.10) | 0.648 |
| NSE 48 hr, ng/ml, mean (IQR) | 25.38 (22.16-23.66) | 37.89 (46.37-63.20) | 0.028 |
VF/VT, ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia; PEA, pulseless electrical activity; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; NSE, neuron-specific enolase. Data are presented as mean with interquartile range, or number with percentages.
Figure 2Hierarchical clustering analysis of expression profiling and determination of high-accuracy gene classifiers in CA patients
A. Two-dimensional diagram of differential expressions of 412 genes and the data were organized by transcript and CPC category based on similarity. B. Dendrogram was derived from clustering using the 412 gene set. To identify classifier genes in the each CPC groups, the expression data of 22 specimens were subjected to the One Way ANOVA test (p < 0.01). C. Accuracy was tested by using the leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) method, and all tested-22 samples were categorized to three different CPC categories. D. PCA analysis of the 412 genes in each CA patient samples. The yellow sphere circle indicates the CPC 1 group, the blue circle indicates the CPC 4 group; the green circle indicates the CPC 5 group. E. Venn diagrammatic analysis of common gene signatures between CPC 4 and CPC 5 group. F. The dendrograms were obtained 64 genes of CPC 4 group and 34 genes of CPC 5 group. The heat-map showed supervised hierarchical clustering of recapitulated gene signature performed by using Genplex software; Pearson correlation, median centering, and complete linkage were used for all clustering applications.
Figure 3Gene set enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed gene signatures in the CA patients
A. Volcano plot representation of differentially expressed gene signatures between Good (CPC 1) and Poor (CPC 4-5) cohorts. The number of differentially expressed genes was depicted in the blue and red box. B. GSEA corresponding heat map images of the enrichment of the CPC category. Genes in heat maps are shown in rows; a sample is provided in one column. Expression levels are represented as a gradient from high (red) to low (blue). C. The bar chart of 21 gene set lists of less than nominal p-value 0.05. D. GSEA enrichment plots of KEGG_NEUROTROPHIN_SIGNALING_PATHWAY enriched to neurological outcome is shown; the barcode indicates gene positions. The y-axis indicates the extent of enrichment.
Enriched gene set in response to CPC difference by GSEA
| No. | ||||||||||
| 1 | PID_ILK_PATHWAY | 0.61 | 1.6 | 0.01 | HSP90AA1 | heat shock protein 90kDa alpha (cytosolic), class A member 1 | ||||
| LIMS1 | LIM and senescent cell antigen-like domains 1 | |||||||||
| ZYX | zyxin | |||||||||
| AKT1 | v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 | |||||||||
| 2 | KEGG_FOCAL_ADHESION | 0.48 | 1.54 | 0.01 | THBS1 | thrombospondin 1 | ||||
| PTK2 | PTK2 protein tyrosine kinase 2 | |||||||||
| BCL2 | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 | |||||||||
| BIRC3 | baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 3 | |||||||||
| BIRC2 | baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 2 | |||||||||
| ZYX | zyxin | |||||||||
| AKT1 | v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 | |||||||||
| MAPK3 | mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 | |||||||||
| ACTN4 | actinin, alpha 4 | |||||||||
| 3 | KEGG_PROSTATE_CANCER | 0.59 | 1.53 | 0.02 | BCL2 | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 | ||||
| HSP90AA1 | heat shock protein 90kDa alpha (cytosolic), class A member 1 | |||||||||
| AKT1 | v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 | |||||||||
| MAPK3 | mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 | |||||||||
| 4 | SIG_IL4RECEPTOR_IN_B_LYPHOCYTES | 0.54 | 1.5 | 0.04 | BCL2 | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 | ||||
| AKT1 | v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 | |||||||||
| MAPK3 | mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 | |||||||||
| STAT6 | signal transducer and activator of transcription 6, interleukin-4 induced | |||||||||
| 5 | KEGG_NEUROTROPHIN_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 0.59 | 1.48 | 0.04 | BCL2 | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 | ||||
| AKT1 | v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 | |||||||||
| MAPK3 | mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 | |||||||||
| 6 | KEGG_COLORECTAL_CANCER | 0.59 | 1.48 | 0.04 | BCL2 | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 | ||||
| AKT1 | v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 | |||||||||
| MAPK3 | mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 | |||||||||
| 7 | BIOCARTA_IL2RB_PATHWAY | 0.59 | 1.48 | 0.04 | BCL2 | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 | ||||
| AKT1 | v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 | |||||||||
| MAPK3 | mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 | |||||||||
| 8 | BIOCARTA_BAD_PATHWAY | 0.59 | 1.48 | 0.04 | BCL2 | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 | ||||
| AKT1 | v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 | |||||||||
| MAPK3 | mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 | |||||||||
| 9 | PID_KIT_PATHWAY | 0.59 | 1.48 | 0.04 | BCL2 | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 | ||||
| AKT1 | v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 | |||||||||
| MAPK3 | mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 | |||||||||
| 10 | ST_INTEGRIN_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 0.61 | 1.46 | 0.04 | PTK2 | PTK2 protein tyrosine kinase 2 | ||||
| ZYX | zyxin | |||||||||
| AKT1 | v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 | |||||||||
Figure 4The ROC curve analysis and correlation of the three candidate molecular markers
A. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for MAPK3, BCL2 and AKT1. (AUC: area under the curve; 95% C.I.: 95% confidence interval). B. The correlation between the expression of MAPK3, BCL2 and AKT1 in good and poor outcome groups.
Figure 5The qRT-PCR of the three candidate molecular markers
The qRT-PCR analysis of the three candidate molecular markers, MAPK3, BCL2 and AKT1. (mean ± S.D, *P < 0.05 versus CPC1).