BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to assess the severity of a cardiac arrest patient's cerebral injury, utilizing treating neurologists' imaging interpretation. We sought to determine whether clinical interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) helps to determine poor outcome in comatose cardiac arrest patients. METHODS: We analyzed 80 consecutive MRIs from patients in coma following cardiac arrest. Each study was graded as "normal" or "abnormal restricted diffusion" in pre-specified brain regions by two blinded stroke neurologists. Poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score >4 at 3 months. Formal interpretations of neuroimaging by non-blinded neuroradiologists were compared with the blinded reviews by the stroke neurologists. RESULTS: DWI abnormalities were highly sensitive (98.5 %) but only modestly specific (46.2 %) for predicting poor neurological outcome. Inter-observer reliability was moderate (kappa = 0.49 ± 0.32), with 91 % agreement between study observers, and no significant differences in study observers' interpretations (p = 0.125). There were, however, significant differences between the study observers and the clinical neuroradiologists in identifying studies showing evidence of global hypoxic-ischemic injury (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative evaluation of imaging abnormalities by stroke physicians in comatose cardiac arrest patients is a highly sensitive method of predicting poor outcome, but with limited specificity.
BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to assess the severity of a cardiac arrestpatient's cerebral injury, utilizing treating neurologists' imaging interpretation. We sought to determine whether clinical interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) helps to determine poor outcome in comatose cardiac arrestpatients. METHODS: We analyzed 80 consecutive MRIs from patients in coma following cardiac arrest. Each study was graded as "normal" or "abnormal restricted diffusion" in pre-specified brain regions by two blinded stroke neurologists. Poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score >4 at 3 months. Formal interpretations of neuroimaging by non-blinded neuroradiologists were compared with the blinded reviews by the stroke neurologists. RESULTS: DWI abnormalities were highly sensitive (98.5 %) but only modestly specific (46.2 %) for predicting poor neurological outcome. Inter-observer reliability was moderate (kappa = 0.49 ± 0.32), with 91 % agreement between study observers, and no significant differences in study observers' interpretations (p = 0.125). There were, however, significant differences between the study observers and the clinical neuroradiologists in identifying studies showing evidence of global hypoxic-ischemic injury (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative evaluation of imaging abnormalities by stroke physicians in comatose cardiac arrestpatients is a highly sensitive method of predicting poor outcome, but with limited specificity.
Authors: Christine A C Wijman; Michael Mlynash; Anna Finley Caulfield; Amie W Hsia; Irina Eyngorn; Roland Bammer; Nancy Fischbein; Gregory W Albers; Michael Moseley Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: C Pierpaoli; J R Alger; A Righini; J Mattiello; R Dickerson; D Des Pres; A Barnett; G Di Chiro Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Ona Wu; A Gregory Sorensen; Thomas Benner; Aneesh B Singhal; Karen L Furie; David M Greer Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Melika Hosseini; Robert H Wilson; Christian Crouzet; Arya Amirhekmat; Kevin S Wei; Yama Akbari Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Clifton W Callaway; Michael W Donnino; Ericka L Fink; Romergryko G Geocadin; Eyal Golan; Karl B Kern; Marion Leary; William J Meurer; Mary Ann Peberdy; Trevonne M Thompson; Janice L Zimmerman Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alexandra S Reynolds; Xiaotao Guo; Elizabeth Matthews; Daniel Brodie; Leroy E Rabbani; David J Roh; Soojin Park; Jan Claassen; Mitchell S V Elkind; Binsheng Zhao; Sachin Agarwal Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Neill K J Adhikari; Damon C Scales; Carmen Lopez Soto; Laura Dragoi; Chinthaka C Heyn; Andreas Kramer; Ruxandra Pinto Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.210